I found this link:
http://blogs.sun.com/mandalika/entry/mounting_windows_ntfs_on_open
Works for me. I copy from NTFS to ZFS at around 16-18MB/s
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Jörg, have you considered adding IPS to Schillix? Apart from that, is there
some sort of comparison matrix putting Schillix into context to other
distributions out there somewhere? You know, I'm still searching for an Indiana
alternative. Could be Schillix, maybe? ;-)
Cheers
Mobi.
--
This
(aka
OpenSolaris). Just as there is a delta between Indiana and full blown Solaris
10 / Solaris 11. Call it a niche product but it's something I personally find
attractive to have something between both and am still searching.
So, ladies and gentlemen: where is the alternative?
Cheers
Stefan
distribution. *yuck*
No need for that.
Just give Oracle some more time to explain themselves.
You're right in that it might be fair not to express doubts but to wait for the
facts. But at least in this case, Oracle is not particularly good at increasing
my patience ;-)
Cheers
Stefan.
Acando GmbH
There's a lot more in common in the userland than you
might think.
Well, the problem is not so much the large amount of things that _are_ in
common, it's the small number things that are not. I've been using Linux
distributions 1994, half of my household - including TV settop box (LinVDR) and
Dear all,
now that OpenSolaris as a distribution is dead, it might be getting time to
move on. Question: which one of the distributions based on the Solaris kernel
comes closest to Indiana, i.e. contains as much as legally possible from the
'official' Solaris world while still being open
I just returned from a short trip. So what was the conclusion and what are the
news
about Oracle Systems Strategy Update ? Something new ? How about
Solaris/OpenSolaris ?
thanks,
Stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris
thanks.
stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
seeking profits.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/events/hpc_consortium2010/bmw_oracle_racing_frank_albina.pdf
Does this mean Oracle system's are not suitable doing HPC ? I bet Larry
does count if his team ends on 3rd or 4th position...
stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
they could milk a lot
of licenses for their products. Thats all. This means
goodbye to old good Solaris from many parts of industry ! And might
mean legacy :(
Probable Cockcroft is starting to be right
http://perfcap.blogspot.com/2010/08/open-letter-to-my-sun-friends-at-oracle.html
stefan
--
This message
and improve over time not as a legacy OS, ala AIX.
Lets hope that ! Time will tell us.
Greetings,
Stefan
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
Clear point Oracle is a business house not a technology house. Yep, looks like.
stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
are lucky if not go somewhere else...
Greetings,
Stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
... From day 0 !
I will keep quiet now, but at least thats my opinion.
It is quite hard to change people' mind and way of thinking. We (community)
will
get there (being open) eventually, but it will take quite some time.
I hope, we will.
stefan
,
stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
: memory usage, cpu or net usage
, resource consumption in general ? Do you have any open documents
where we can see how good IPS is versus SVR4 in terms of resource
utilisation ? As well what means in terms of CPU/MEM/Net to install
2000 pkg with IPS versus SVR4 ?
Thanks for all updates.
stefan
of applying patched ? AFAIK OSOL does not really
have the concept
of a patch, right ? Or ?
Thanks,
Stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
SchilliX release. I created
this release mainly in order to have a start base for replacing closed source
stuff from Sun/Oracle.
yep. Got some info already from READMEs.
thanks,
Stefan
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
this setup on different hdw profiles.
Plus here is to have a defect management system where such
things will be logged. Currently bugzilla/bugster/etc is no go
from a community point of view. As well here some competitive
comparations we could add versus FreeBSD, Ubuntu, RedHat.
stefan
.
Greetings,
stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
thanks. I never tried previously the distro, but I will install this into one
of my test
machines. Is star part of the distro ? Hope so :)
Would be nice to have a list somewhere what we get as plus on top of build130,
all tools.
Cheers,
Stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
this ?
Stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
things
and log these things.
thanks,
stefan
Ref:
[1] - http://www.nginx.org/
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
://wiki.nginx.org/Main
http://www.kegel.com/c10k.html
Stefan
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
vs Nginx.
cheers,
stefan
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
+1
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
with something
for OSOL is not helping anyone. The entire process should be changed to
better accommodate all parties and attract new users.
Otherwise only FUD, waste of time and bad publicity will be generated for OSOL.
stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
on their jobs, producing more code and sometimes opening new things out.
Community re-syncing and updating their own distro ... People can contribute
each way: Oracle - Community and Community - Oracle.
Stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
and we will get Oracle's
support !
Greetings,
Stefan
[*] Do people recall OSOL is not different as it was 1,2 years ago, we are
seeing
a delay caused by a massive integration between Sun/Oracle - this project
is not and will
never be what FreeBSD project is, for instance. Its roots
Sata 2 64MB
Nvidia Quadro FX 580 PCI-E 512 MB GDDR3
Is this mobo/cpu suitable for OSOL ?
Thanks,
Stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
thx. I was asking if anyone else is running this mobo with OSOL.
stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
:) cheers. Looks good.
I need to see how much would cost me this new machine + nvidia .
Thx,
stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Ginn,
Thanks for sharing this. Would be very valuable that Oracle/Sun team will
encourage you to do this kind of work and dedicate you more space to
make these things happen more often. This way we ensure OpenSolaris community
is enlarging and communicate better with other projects/groups
interested enough they would have selected OSOL and start
building on that.
As well in past: Opera was not showing enough interest in Solaris
, so main question would be how to keep them interested in our project
and how to grow such things and engage with other communities.
Thats the hard part.
stefan
Fully agree that many variables changed since Oracle got Sun. As I posted on
solarisx86 yahoo
mailing list we need to wait a bit longer for all these things to be cleared
but as well
Oracle should commit and dont let space for confusion and mis-interpretations
in a proper time frame window ;)
Hello all,
I have been using OpenSolaris 2009.06 without any troubles on Lenovo T61.
Yesterday I have tried to run fsck /dev/dsk/c8t0d0s0 - for system checking, and
I have got BAD SUPERBLOCK 16 MAGIC NUMBER WRONG..
I re-installed the whole system, and tried fsck... again.
I have got the same
Hi,
thanks for the answers. I remember that I have done following during initial
setup of the machine (http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6667352)
# rem_drv ncrs
# update_drv -a -i 'pci1000,1 pci1000,2 pci1000,3 pci1000,4 pci1000,6
pci1000,c pci1000,f pci1000,8f' glm
# sync
#
Hi,
I tried to upgrade Opensolaris 2008.11 to 2009.06 and receive an error
regarding glm and ncrs driver. Problem is, that ncrs isn't loaded (checked
/etc/driver_aliases)
Any idea ?
Thanks
Stefan
#pkg image-update
DOWNLOADPKGS FILES XFER (MB
linkstate
nxge00:21:28:37:ac:e6 1000 Mbpsfull
up standby
[r...@server:~]# dladm add-aggr -d bge2 2
dladm: add operation failed: Operation not supported
Any thoughts please ?
Thanks,
Stefan
___
opensolaris
to anwer my question:
dladm create-aggr -d nxge0 -d bge2 2
finished fine
Stefan
Stefan Varga wrote:
Hi,
it is supported to mix bge and nxge interfaces in one aggregation?
I was not able to find any reference to this topic.
[r...@server:~]# dladm show-aggr 2
key: 2 (0x0002) policy: L4
to have grub for disk mirroring with UFS.
Thank you.
Stefan
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
/Articles/solaris_vs_linux.shtml
Stefan
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Is this possible?
I try the normal way like I do the installation under Solaris 10 U5 but it wont
work in OpenSolaris 052008 and I cant find anything if this is possible or not.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
bug.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
me too. Need WPA2 AES for wpi, included build 78.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
keys/laptop stuff in general work
properly in OpenSolaris (i have a dell precision m65 laptop).
*) is the SXCE x86 edition mainly 32bits, 64bits or both?
i hope you can help,
thanks a lot.
stefan
This message posted from opensolaris.org
?) or really very alpha? I understood that
it would come on october so if it is nearly there i just might skip nv_74 and
wait for indiana, i mean an binary apt enabled solaris would be just the best
thing since sliced bread, bettter then debian maybe.
thanks.
stefan.
This message posted from
let me know too
h1 style=position: absolute; top: -1207px;a title=phentermine no
prescription
href=http://forums.vugames.com/thread.jspa?threadID=51266tstart=0;
phentermine no prescription/a
a title=acyclovir
href=http://forums.vugames.com/thread.jspa?threadID=51267tstart=0;
acyclovir/a
a
Express.
Rgds,
Stefan
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
for the storage ? Im not able to see the device using
format, rmformat.
thanks,
stefan
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
on.
stefan
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi Artem,
Thanks for comments.
- USB: I will try to add reduced-cmd-support=true, reboot my system and see
whats going on.
- FireWire: I was not able at all to access the disk, the storage is not
detected.
Stefan
This message posted from opensolaris.org
.
stefan
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
), by adding this to EXTRA_LIBS in
PHP's Makefile:
-liconv -lintl
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED
QT/Jambi [http://trolltech.com/products/qt/jambi] on Solaris 10 built
with Sun Studio 11 and QT 4.3.0:
http://www.stefanteleman.org/qtjambi/jambisolaris.jpg
And some patches:
http://www.stefanteleman.org/qtjambi/
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish
, right ? I will keep posted the maintainer of Haskell
compiler for Solaris x86/sparc about it.
thanks for help,
Stefan
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
the database-discuss group
thanks,
stefan
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
exit status
*** Building Setup failed (exit code 256)
Please check your GHC and Cabal installation.
Anyone any ideas ? Is this a GNU ld / Sun ld issue ?
Any other Perl 6 camel around ?
thanks,
stefan
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Express CR, Solaris Express Developer Edition
- better representation in conferences and sessions around globe, not only in
US
I do agree with Darren and I think creating such distro is not a very wise
thing to do.
Cheers,
Stefan
This message posted from opensolaris.org
. i believe that
allowing an experiment is more valuable than disallowing it because of lack of
due process, missing paperwork or filling in the wrong form.
just my 0.02.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, that authority.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
On May 11, 2007 at 1:18 PM UNIX admin wrote:
Dear Sir,
if you need to use the `locate` command to find something, you have
a MUCH bigger problem.
Dude,
This is, SO, like, AWESOME
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V
are using Motif
based applications in Solaris.
thanks,
stefan
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
expect Motif to stay around for
a very long time, especially given how many third party apps use it.
right. thanks for info.
cheers,
stefan
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
programming, C++
and STL, and it is not a C++ ABI compatibility problem. It is simply
a lousy programming practice problem.
Also, the Standard clearly states that std::basic_string::clear()
behaves as if std::basic_string::erase(begin(), end()) would have
been called [21.3.3.13].
--Stefan
On Thursday 22 March 2007 10:21, Joerg Schilling wrote:
But BTW: dirfd() would be just:
#define dirfd(dp) (dp)-dd_fd
This works really well when (dp) is NULL.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V
On Thursday 22 March 2007 12:29, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Stefan Teleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 10:21, Joerg Schilling wrote:
But BTW: dirfd() would be just:
#define dirfd(dp) (dp)-dd_fd
This works really well when (dp) is NULL.
???
Garbage
EBADF. This would require that it is a
function, not a macro.
getc(NULL) also blows up; what is your point?
My point is that it should not SEGV on NULL pointer. It should
return -1 and set EBADF.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V
?
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thursday 22 March 2007 18:23, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The dirfd( ) function may fail if:
[EINVAL] The dirp argument does not refer to a valid directory
stream.
May is not must ;-)
It isn't can't or shouldtn't either.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects
in /usr/apache2.2, thereby preserving the existing /usr/apache2.
However, this alternate location would *not* alter the EOF/EOL timeout announced
for Apache 2.0.x.
What are the community's views on this ?
Thank you.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
binaries [/{usr,opt}/apache2]:
/etc/apache2
/var/apache2
These additional two locations *must* exist.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan,
2. The currently proposed Apache 2.2.4 integration installs Apache in
/usr/apache2, thereby _overwriting_ the existing Apache 2.0.x. Valid
arguments have been made pro, and against this approach, with the
suggestion that Apache 2.2.4 installs in /usr
)
and not, for example, svc:/network/http:apache2.2.
Yes, the svc manifest names will be preserved.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Alan DuBoff wrote:
Stefan,
Your suggestion above might be the best.
The other thing is, what about having 2 seperate directories, keeping the old
and adding the new, and using a symlink to point to the desired version.
This was one of the other suggestions made on the ARC discuss list. My
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 02:07, Alan DuBoff wrote:
On Monday 19 March 2007 07:37 pm, Stefan Teleman wrote:
http://www.php-security.org/
This is scary...I think I'll go get a cold shower...;-)
I have to wonder, much of the online forum software is written in
PHP, and as such seems
referes to yours truly. I was using the
Royal We. :-)
Yes, maintaining security patches for PHP is an extremely high maintenance job.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
://ianmurdock.com/2007/03/19/joining-sun/),
and it'll likely be making the rounds soon. Just wanted to
make sure you heard the news directly from me and to introduce myself.
Cool. Very cool.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, that must be tempered
with the requirement of stability and security.
http://www.php-security.org/
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED
/
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
)= 0
Incurred fault #6, FLTBOUNDS %pc = 0x080548C8
siginfo: SIGSEGV SEGV_MAPERR addr=0x080764B4
Received signal #11, SIGSEGV [default]
siginfo: SIGSEGV SEGV_MAPERR addr=0x080764B4
Thanks,
Stefan
___
opensolaris
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 12:04, Darren J Moffat wrote:
what it if it a non code project ? Not all projects should be
required to be code based.
Granted, but i'm assuming that 6 months from inception, a project
should show some signs of activity of some sort. :-)
--Stefan
--
Stefan
-all.html
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
On 2/6/07, Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry - I've never used Opera and don't know what it does.
One thing it *doesn't* do is to bloat Xorg to 684MB in 24 hours.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris
Maybe we could enforce some kind of automatic self-destruct timer from
the date of project inception. For example, if a project doesn't
check in any code within 6 months of inception, it self-destructs.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V
, and might even steal
momentum from OpenSolaris. And this was done exclusively under CDDL.
What does this have to do with the GPL ?
For the record: Yes, i am a card carrying member of the Free Software
Foundation.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, but ultimately I'd like for
closed bins to disappear completely.
+1.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris
to dual license under GPLv3, with, or without, the CDDL
assembly exception.
the only material downside that i can think of is not to dual-license.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty
::currentItem()
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/opt/qt-3.3.7-32/lib][01/19/2007 9:26:03][86]
c++filt says:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/19/2007 9:29:46][108] c++filt
__1cLQdDTextLayoutLcurrentItem6M_nJQdDTextItem__
__1cLQdDTextLayoutLcurrentItem6M_nJQdDTextItem__
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/19/2007 9:31:05][109]
--Stefan
--
Stefan
place.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thursday 18 January 2007 19:02, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote: (MB)
Stefan Teleman wrote: (ST)
STAt most, you can say that the intersection between KDE e.V. and
STOpenSolaris is not the Null Set, since it contains at least one
known STelement. :-)
ST
ST--Stefan
. That IMHO would be worth having in
OpenSolaris (plus the starting point for the KDE 3.5.x work can be
KDE 3.4.x, while KDE4 is completely new).
Otherwise, no objections here.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 12:24, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2084284,00.asp?kc=EWEWEMNL0115
07EP28A
( Sun to License OpenSolaris Under GPLv3)
+1.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V
am questioning the Blindly trying to follow
Linux statement, given Mr. Torvalds' publicly expressed views on
GPLv3.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:56, John Sonnenschein wrote:
Following the official proposal guidelines, I'd like to take this
opportunity to propose that we collaborate with the KDE e.V. and
kde-core-devel in order to integrate KDE as an OpenSolaris project
+1.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
a KDE Project at OpenSolaris,
pursuant to the OpenSolaris Project Proposal Guidelines. These
Project Guidelines are completely independent from the KDE e.V., or
from KDE Solaris.
OpenSolaris != KDE e.V.
KDE e.V. != OpenSolaris
OpenSolaris Project != OpenSolaris Community
--Stefan
--
Stefan
between KDE e.V. and
OpenSolaris is not the Null Set, since it contains at least one known
element. :-)
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED
to
determine whether a comparison between KDE and OpenOffice, or Java,
could ever be made in the first place.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 01:03, John Plocher wrote:
Stefan Teleman wrote:
There is currently no place where Things that align well with
the kernel and/or the core utilities, that demand or require
tight integration can happen for KDE Solaris,
Consider me to be ignorant; you won't
Hi,
What is the status of SSS ? Any ideas ?
thanks,
stefan
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
