Horvath wrote:
Has anyone tried b78 if it runs on sata?
What do you mean, runs on sata? OpenSolaris has worked with SATA drives
for years.
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
We do not (and have never) searched the known
Universe for possible
conflicts that may possibly live in somebody's home
directory.
They're just not relevant, no matter what time/date
stamp might be on
that file.
You're asking for us to be reasonable, so I think we
should ask the
same
Ian,
He meant SATA ATAPI drives (specifically, CD/DVD) drives on Nvidia chipsets.
The sata drivers for nvidia don't support ATAPI mode right now, so unless bios
offers a legacy mode (some don't) you can't install from DVD/CD.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I was not referring to sponsors -- the work of making star compatible
with tar(1) when executed as tar is yours to do, and much of the other
work is yours too, but if you do this as someone outside SWAN then
you'll be getting a sponsor to help with certain tasks (and either way
you'll need
James, you make good points. Certainly nobody can search every nook
and cranny or know what is in someone's head. However, this
particular scenario is specific because a conflict was brought to
attention.
The crucial question is this: is the PSARC / ARC / whatever you
want to call
Kyle McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please explain why some people including you try to convert
a general problem (that I mentioned some time ago) into a personal problem?
I'm not making it personal. I don't see how you read that into what I
wrote. I was just applying
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, UNIX admin wrote:
[ ... ]
When I see something like that, I go through the roof. Probably because I
experience it every day, so I've grown extremely sensitive to it.
You wanted to help. The other guy was just trying to put the blame on someone
else hoping that the
Changing the subject as the ogiginal subject has no relation to the current
topic in the mail
Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
It is Sun that is interested in the integration but it also Sun that tries
to prevent it now. I am prepared but there is some
Hi there:
Facing the same problem, i.e. to be able to enable remote X login
tried the commands mentioned above, getting the following error. Any help is
welcome!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/dt/config]svcadm enable
svc:/application/graphical-login/cde-login
svcadm: Pattern
Bart Blanquart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ARC looked at the information given to it and decided that
retaining compatibility around the ImageMagick command names (that
had been shipped before in SFW, and exist as such on many other
platforms on which the ImageMagick tools are
Joerg Schilling wrote:
The wish resulted in PSARC 2004/480 and I cannot understand why something that
has been decided to be needed now has no people to work on. It seems that
there
is a problem in the way Sun is organized if this can happen.
An approved PSARC case has nothing to do with
Alan,
As your first link indicated is says that the build is on hold and should be
released some day later. This was Dec 4 and my post was made Dec 20. The
originator of this thread posted Dec 18 with no apparent response.
An announcement should be updated accordingly if an change is made and
Build 78 is out.
Robert wrote:
Alan,
As your first link indicated is says that the build is on hold and should be
released some day later. This was Dec 4 and my post was made Dec 20. The
originator of this thread posted Dec 18 with no apparent response.
An announcement should be updated
I've also seen at least two others posts asking about this delay with no
apparent answer either so this communication needs to exist
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On Dec 20, 2007 2:27 PM, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan,
An announcement should be updated accordingly if an change is made and not
become 'buried' in the discussion forum since this is indeed an announcement
of an delay.
But that's my €0.09.
We're all aware that there are no SLAs
UNIX admin writes:
The crucial question is this: is the PSARC / ARC / whatever you want to call
it -- let's call it the process so *rigid* and so *inflexible* that, even
when someone external reports a conflict, nothing can be done about it?
There's no conflict. Nobody (not even Joerg) has
You might want to try running that app under dbx and using the run-time memory
checker to see if you can spot any errors:
dbx qlsc
(dbx) dbxenv rtc_auto_continue on
(dbx) dbxenv error_log_file_name /your/log/file
(dbx) check -all -frames 16
(dbx) run list -a wmc -q 8
(That's from memory, so if
[Please refrain from copying me on these mails; I, like everyone
involved, am on this mailing list]
On 20 Dec 2007, at 13:19, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Bart Blanquart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ARC looked at the information given to it and decided that
retaining compatibility around the
Hi,
I've got a SXCE b77 install running with a zfs root.
I'd like to upgrade to b78 and I wondered if the live upgrade tools
support using zfs snapshot/clone to create the BE?
Is this possible yet?
Thanks,
R.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On Dec 20, 2007 7:27 AM, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan,
As your first link indicated is says that the build is on hold and should be
released some day later. This was Dec 4 and my post was made Dec 20. The
originator of this thread posted Dec 18 with no apparent response.
Actually,
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Kyle McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please explain why some people including you try to convert
a general problem (that I mentioned some time ago) into a personal problem?
I'm not making it personal. I don't see how you read that into what
Hi,
I recently installed 4 GB RAM but only see 3 GB. Maybe this is an
issue of have been loading the 32 bit kernel. I am encountering a
strange problem when I type this command:
uname -a
It shows:
SunOS solar-star 5.11 snv_77 i86pc i386 i86pc
Should not stand here something with i686 then?
Hi Roman,
these values are reported for all x86 compatible machines. Doesn't
matter if it's i386, Intel Dual Core or AMD Athlon64.
If you want better value, use command 'isainfo'.
HTH,
Milan Cermak
Roman Morokutti napsal(a):
Hi,
I recently installed 4 GB RAM but only see 3 GB. Maybe this is
Hi,
I recently installed 4 GB RAM but only see 3 GB. Maybe this is an
issue of have been loading the 32 bit kernel. I am encountering a
strange problem when I type this command:
Might be a BIOS issue, not a Solaris issue.
Even a 32 bit kernel can deal with 4GB or more just fine.
uname -a
Roman Morokutti wrote:
Hi,
I recently installed 4 GB RAM but only see 3 GB. Maybe this is an
issue of have been loading the 32 bit kernel. I am encountering a
strange problem when I type this command:
uname -a
It shows:
SunOS solar-star 5.11 snv_77 i86pc i386 i86pc
Should not
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 08:10 -0800, Roman Morokutti wrote:
Hi,
I recently installed 4 GB RAM but only see 3 GB. Maybe this is an
issue of have been loading the 32 bit kernel. I am encountering a
strange problem when I type this command:
uname -a
It shows:
SunOS solar-star 5.11
Hi!
Glynn asked me (as the upstream PulseAudio maintainer) to respond to this
thread, so here I go. I'll try to respond to all the points raised in this
thread:
Richard Hamilton listed a couple of sound servers, claiming that it was a
problem to adopt a sound server because there were so
Atul Gore wrote:
Hi there:
Facing the same problem, i.e. to be able to enable remote X login
tried the commands mentioned above, getting the following error. Any help is
welcome!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/dt/config]svcadm enable
svc:/application/graphical-login/cde-login
svcadm:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
The wish resulted in PSARC 2004/480 and I cannot understand why something that
has been decided to be needed now has no people to work on. It seems that
there
is a problem in the way Sun is organized if this can happen.
Sun is a for-profit business in a fast changing
On Dec 20, 2007 10:22 AM, Lennart Poettering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Glynn asked me (as the upstream PulseAudio maintainer) to respond to this
thread, so here I go. I'll try to respond to all the points raised in this
thread:
Richard Hamilton listed a couple of sound servers,
Garrett D'Amore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said earlier: show your commitment by deeds not words. The next
time I hear you complain about how you can't integrate star because Sun
is against you and no one will do the work, I'm going to add a filter so
I never see mail from you again,
Simon Phipps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007, at 15:45, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Once it has been verified that it is possible to contribute to
OpenSolaris
I am happy to do so but please note that:
Do you have reasons to believe this is not the case? I understood the
Should a bug fixed in snv_66 be in S10 u4 (8/07) ?
Specifically I observer 6528189 in u4.
Thanks.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Ray Clark wrote:
Should a bug fixed in snv_66 be in S10 u4 (8/07) ?
No. They are two completely different branches of the tree,
and only a subset of the bugs fixed in snv are backported to
S10 updates.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
What action should I take [1] To bring it to someone's attention, and [2] To
get a working system in the near term. I am trying to migrate from Linux to
Solaris, and frankly have not figured out they lay of the land yet.
6528189 consists of a cp -p over NFS to a ZFS file system failing, giving
I've been using linux for two years, but recently got tired of the constant
bugs. My main use is building ruby on rails applications.
Is there a Ruby on Rails port for OS? How about MySQL?
I have a widescreen 22 inch monitor at 1680x1050. Some Linux distros have
problems with the resolution.
Ray Clark wrote:
What action should I take [1] To bring it to someone's attention, and [2] To
get a working system in the near term.
For the general case, open a support call with technical support or
upgrade to Solaris Express. That there are bugs in Solaris 10 (or any
other software product
Kyle McDonald writes:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
A big question still remains: what is GNU software and should non-gnu
software go to /usr/gnu?
That (If I recall correctly) was one of the questions raised on the
conference call and email thread. I was never clear why that was a good
James Carlson wrote:
Kyle McDonald writes:
I don't know the answers to all therse questions. I beleive they are
answerable, but I know Sun had a timetable, and probably didn't want to
hold up that one ARC case to hashing out this bigger problem.
Untrue. We held that exact
Ray Clark writes:
What action should I take [1] To bring it to someone's attention, and [2] To
get a working system in the near term. I am trying to migrate from Linux to
Solaris, and frankly have not figured out they lay of the land yet.
6528189 consists of a cp -p over NFS to a ZFS file
thank you Mritun for explaining that for me :) damn man I guess I'll have to
wait for fixed release except I don't know how long.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Dec 20, 2007 6:22 PM, Lennart Poettering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Glynn asked me (as the upstream PulseAudio maintainer) to respond to this
thread, so here I go. I'll try to respond to all the points raised in this
thread:
Richard Hamilton listed a couple of sound servers,
On 12/20/07 18:25, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Garrett D'Amore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said earlier: show your commitment by deeds not words. The next
time I hear you complain about how you can't integrate star because Sun
is against you and no one will do the work, I'm going to add a
Joep Vesseur wrote:
On 12/20/07 18:25, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Garrett D'Amore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said earlier: show your commitment by deeds not words. The next
time I hear you complain about how you can't integrate star because Sun
is against you and no one will do
On Dec 20, 2007 9:09 PM, Neal Pollack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joep Vesseur wrote:
Could you please explain this to Casper Dik?
There is nothing to explain to Casper. He grasped the picture from
second one. He even explained what was going on. Someone else was
first to use /usr/bin/compare and
Frank is right. I got this:
# echo ::msgbuf | mdb -k /var/crash/unknown/[uv]*2
MESSAGE
PCI-device: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ohci1
ohci1 is /[EMAIL PROTECTED],60/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pcisch0 at root: SAFARI 0x1c 0x60
pcisch0 is /[EMAIL PROTECTED],60
NOTICE: ce0: no fault external to device;
Hmmm... You're using SXCE/DE, not Indiana, right?
Try this:
svcs -a | grep cde-login
I see a service on my installation.
Gary
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
For what it's worth, it looks like some other
customer already did
that, and the patch came out as 127728-02 for SPARC
and 127729-02 for
x86. It was released back in early November.
You can get those from sunsolve.sun.com .
Cheers
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Joep Vesseur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He did start this thread and if you like to filter someone, you would need
to filter Casper...
I have not kept record of all the times we have discussed this subject, so I
honestly can't say who started it and who didn't, but in favor of us all
Joep Vesseur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He did start this thread and if you like to filter someone, you would need
to filter Casper...
I have not kept record of all the times we have discussed this subject, so I
honestly can't say who started it and who didn't, but in favor of us all
Il Wednesday 19 December 2007 23:57:07 Erast Benson ha scritto:
Hi All,
This is the road to NCP 1.0...
Our motto:
Ubuntu makes best Debian Desktop platform - Nexenta makes best
Debian Server/Storage platform.
Some latest Nexenta related news:
1) Official Nexenta Core Platform (NCP)
According to a recent report, over 350,000 units of EeePCs have been sold since
November, well over Asus's initial target of 200~300K for the entire year; Asus
expects to sell 5 million units in 2008:
I have installed 127729-2 (and about 66 other patches), and now instead of
saying Invalid argument, it says Operation Not Supported. I guess that is
a better message, but I wish it were more specific. Not sure whether that is
Linux' doing or Solaris.
I found
Hi
Welcome :-)
Is there a Ruby on Rails port for OS? How about
MySQL?
Both exist for Solaris. mysql is in default install. RoR is available through
Netbeans 6.0 + Sun Java App Server 9.1 (glassfish V2) + JRuby. JRuby is
currently the fastest implementation of Ruby 1.8 (i.e. one that would
Colby,
See:
http://blogs.sun.com/alanc/entry/xorg_for_solaris_spar
c#comments
Drivers for UPA cards like Creator (ffb) and Elite3D
(afb) probably won't be ported by Sun. Someone who is
interested may be able to port the support from BSD
or Linux. For PCI cards based on the ATI chips
This is the first time that I returned to reading some opensolaris list
messages in exactly a month and a day. And then, after 1 minute, I find this, I
don't grasp it ... :
On 12/20/07 18:25, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Garrett D'Amore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said earlier: show your
Hi Ken,
ok, accepted.
You did bring up the Scanpci.c file which was one of
the things I tried to mention earlier as contributors
like you having all of the tools, docs, and files you
need to get the job done.
That's a good goal. But I couln't instantly extract it from your original msg.
Gary:
Thanks for your response.
Here are more details about the system:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/]cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 6/06 s10s_u2wos_09a SPARC
Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license
58 matches
Mail list logo
