[osol-discuss] How do I update my bugreport?
Hi guys, I filed a bug last week, I got an email yesterday saying the bug has changed status to incomplete and if I could please give more information acording to the filled in fields by the engineer working on the bug. I'd love to do that but... how do I do this? I can't even find my bug back in the database :s Patrick ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] does the issue that writing more than 1K bytes to pty hangs still exist on Solaris8/10?
Hi Solaris experts I am new for Solaris development. But I have developed on Linux for several year. Recently I have to transform a program from Linux to Solaris. The program uses ssh to connect to a remote host and redirects the input/output of ssh to a unix socket locally. It also has a component to send commands into the unix socket. After the commands are transferred to remote host and executed there, the results are received from the same unix socket. This program works very well on linux. However, when remote host is solaris, if the command line is longer than 1024 bytes, sometimes some bytes can not reach the remote host. This phenomenon occurs mainly in case my program connects to the unix socket as soon as the ssh connection is created. If I make the program sleep several seconds after the connection is created. This issue rarely happens. I also made hundreds of stress tests for command line less than 1024 bytes. This issue absolutely can not be reproduced. I searched on Sun site and found that following bug is similar to my issue. === program hangs writing 1K bytes or more to pseudo terminal bug 1209258 http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-1-1209258-1 - Jun 6, 1995 === But this bug is reported in 1995, rather ancient one. Does it still not fixed? I am so puzzled. Could anyone explain this to me? Thank you very much ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] common ( Win64/Linux/SNV/UNIX ) filesystem du jour ?
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Cyril Plisko wrote: On Dec 9, 2007 8:11 PM, Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The next question is how to create a single filesystem on a USB attached device ( like a USB Stick from SanDisk or Kingston etc ) where the filesystem is supported and read/write functional on all of Win32/Win64/Linux and Solaris/UNIX. I don't think that NTFS is worth looking at because it is closed and proprietary. Microsoft could bork that up at a whim without telling anyone. The only two others I see are old world FAT nd FAT32. The FAT type filesystem is too small and restricted for anything real world. That leaves FAT32. Am I missing anything ? Any suggestions ? Dennis, As long as your media is less than 32GB FAT32 should be ok. Another possibility is UDF. Although last time I check Windows considered it to be read-only (that was quite some time ago and I am not sure what is the status today) FAT32 larger than 32GB just works fine (apart from the abysmal speed if a filesystem of that size gets fragmented), even on Windows. The problem is that Windows will not let you create and/or properly scandisk/chkdsk such a large FAT32. But that's an arbitrary limitation created by Microsoft to push people towards NTFS (and to avoid having to deal with service inquiries ... or the need to improve the implementation). If you create the fs under Linux or Solaris, and fsck it under Linux, there's no issue at all with using a FAT32 filesystem of up to 1TB. If you really want to go beyond that, hmm - no good idea either. FrankH. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] does the issue that writing more than 1K bytes to pty hangs still exist on Solaris8/10?
Yue Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Solaris experts I am new for Solaris development. But I have developed on Linux for several year. Recently I have to transform a program from Linux to Solaris. The program uses ssh to connect to a remote host and redirects the input/output of ssh to a unix socket locally. It also has a component to send commands into the unix socket. After the commands are transferred to remote host and executed there, the results are received from the same unix socket. This program works very well on linux. However, when remote host is solaris, if the command line is longer than 1024 bytes, sometimes some If you like to transfer bigger chunks, you need to set the the send and reveive buffer size of the socket using setsockopt. This is the expected behavior. Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount -o which can mount IMG file with specified offset?
Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount -o which can mount IMG file with specified offset? Or if I can get an Utility to do this kind of job? Thanks! Frank ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How do I update my bugreport?
div id=jive-html-wrapper-div divHi guys,/div div /div divI filed a bug last week, I got an email yesterday saying the bug has changed status to incomplete and if I could please give more information acording to the filled in fields by the engineer working on the bug./div divI'd love to do that but... how do I do this? I can't even find my bug back in the database :s/div div /div div /div divPatrick/div /div___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Was the bug filed through http://bugs.opensolaris.org/ or Bugzilla? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How do I update my bugreport?
On Dec 11, 2007 11:49 AM, Ché Kristo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Was the bug filed through http://bugs.opensolaris.org/ or Bugzilla? Hi Ché , It was filed at bugs.opensolaris.org :) Patrick ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris with iSCSI Luns and IPMP 3 x 1 Gbe eth SAN . Is it sensib
Chandan, Now the only thing left is iSCSI PGR ... is this enabled guys ... please someone at least tell me if this is being developed, because i am ready to wait if this is going to be out by another 20 or 30 days or so .. iSCSI PGR support has been available since build 74... :) waiting for all your guidance. -- Chandan Maddanna, Unix Services, Bangalore, CSC India. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Jim Dunham Storage Platform Software Group Sun Microsystems, Inc. wk: 781.442.4042 http://blogs.sun.com/avs http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/avs/ http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/iscsitgt/ http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/storage/ ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount -o which can mount IMG file with specified offset?
On Dec 11, 2007 1:25 AM, Zhang, Frank F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount -o which can mount IMG file with specified offset? Or if I can get an Utility to do this kind of job? Are you talking about mapping an image file to a loop device, and mount it -o loop ? I haven't tried the loop arguement to mount on solaris, but it's pretty easy to manually mapping a file to a loop device, and then mounting the loop device. Check out: lofiadm(1M) As for mounting the image with an offset, I'm not aware of how you are doing this in linux, and generally this isn't needed for an iso image, but you may consider using dd(1M) to cut the image into multiple files. Thanks! Frank ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount -o which can mount IMG file with specified offset?
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Josh Lange wrote: On Dec 11, 2007 1:25 AM, Zhang, Frank F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount -o which can mount IMG file with specified offset? Or if I can get an Utility to do this kind of job? Are you talking about mapping an image file to a loop device, and mount it -o loop ? I haven't tried the loop arguement to mount on solaris, but it's pretty easy to manually mapping a file to a loop device, and then mounting the loop device. Check out: lofiadm(1M) As for mounting the image with an offset, I'm not aware of how you are doing this in linux, and generally this isn't needed for an iso image, but you may consider using dd(1M) to cut the image into multiple files. On Solaris, it depends on the filesystem. FAT filesystems within images of PC-style partitioned disks can be mounted using the 'normal' PCFS syntax /dev/lofi/1:[c-z] but that functionality is limited to PCFS. It's not a generic lofi thing. Although it should be - the request is not new, see: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=4765069 and what's associated with it. But then, there's always more than one way to do it ... and in case of what you can do right now, creating an iSCSI target where the backing store is your partitioned image file, and then using the iSCSI initiator on the same machine to access it (as a sd-managed disk) should allow you to get the partitions. Sounds a bit like poke around the back, through the ribs and up right into the eye, but hey ... :) Have you tried the iscsitadm / iscsiadm workaround ? FrankH. Thanks! Frank ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org -- No good can come from selling your freedom, not for all the gold in the world, for the value of this heavenly gift far exceeds that of any fortune on earth. -- ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How do I update my bugreport?
Patrick Ale writes: I filed a bug last week, I got an email yesterday saying the bug has changed status to incomplete and if I could please give more information acording to the filled in fields by the engineer working on the bug. I'd love to do that but... how do I do this? I can't even find my bug back in the database :s I found four bugs that appear to be from you; none are in incomplete state. 6594586 root slice not within 1024 cylinders (SATA) 6628352 libexpat.so.1 is missing after BFU to nv_76 6628353 Make libraries reside in the same directory 6639117 JDS only starts with xVM kernel Was it one of those, or something else? -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How do I update my bugreport?
On Dec 11, 2007 2:04 PM, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found four bugs that appear to be from you; none are in incomplete state. 6594586 root slice not within 1024 cylinders (SATA) 6628352 libexpat.so.1 is missing after BFU to nv_76 6628353 Make libraries reside in the same directory 6639117 JDS only starts with xVM kernel Hi James! It's CR 6639382. JDS Soundsystem not working properly. Even though I got the answer yesterday per this mailing list I'd like to update the bugreport per request of the engineer. Patrick ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] does the issue that writing more than 1K bytes to pty hangs still exist on Solaris8/10?
Yue Chen writes: I searched on Sun site and found that following bug is similar to my issue. === program hangs writing 1K bytes or more to pseudo terminal bug 1209258 http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-1-1209258-1 - Jun 6, 1995 === But this bug is reported in 1995, rather ancient one. Does it still not fixed? I am so puzzled. Could anyone explain this to me? It was closed as not a bug on the same day it was filed back in 1995. The problem, as best I can tell, was with the test program. It was writing data but the other end wasn't reading anything, so the writing end was blocked. The program was blocked; it was not losing data. I don't think that CR has much to do with the problem you're reporting. File a bug. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How do I update my bugreport?
Patrick Ale writes: It's CR 6639382. JDS Soundsystem not working properly. Even though I got the answer yesterday per this mailing list I'd like to update the bugreport per request of the engineer. The RE assigned is Brian Cameron; you should contact him directly. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Josh Lange wrote: On Dec 11, 2007 1:25 AM, Zhang, Frank F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount -o which can mount IMG file with specified offset? Or if I can get an Utility to do this kind of job? Are you talking about mapping an image file to a loop device, and mount it -o loop ? I haven't tried the loop arguement to mount on solaris, but it's pretty easy to manually mapping a file to a loop device, and then mounting the loop device. Check out: lofiadm(1M) As for mounting the image with an offset, I'm not aware of how you are doing this in linux, and generally this isn't needed for an iso image, but you may consider using dd(1M) to cut the image into multiple files. On Solaris, it depends on the filesystem. FAT filesystems within images of PC-style partitioned disks can be mounted using the 'normal' PCFS syntax /dev/lofi/1:[c-z] but that functionality is limited to PCFS. It's not a generic lofi thing. Although it should be - the request is not new, see: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=47650 9 and what's associated with it. But then, there's always more than one way to do it ... and in case of what you can do right now, creating an iSCSI target where the backing store is your partitioned image file, and then using the iSCSI initiator on the same machine to access it (as a sd-managed disk) should allow you to get the partitions. Sounds a bit like poke around the back, through the ribs and up right into the eye, but hey ... :) Have you tried the iscsitadm / iscsiadm workaround ? FrankH. BTW, if you are looking to extract slices of a boot CD ISO, someone wrote a script for that (SPARC, anyway) some time back, and I had written a C program (and IIRC posted it to Usenet - try groups.google.com) to do the job too. Once thus extracted, one could use lofiadm on the resulting individual files. IIRC, it doesn't extract the slice at the start of the ISO, since one could get that one by using lofiadm on the original ISO. To save anyone the trouble of digging it up, see http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.solaris/browse_thread/thread/39f9de148ed0df23/6ad98d95e58bf59c?lnk=stq=group%3Acomp.unix.solaris+iso+slices#6ad98d95e58bf59c for a thread about some of this. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount
BTW, if you are looking to extract slices of a boot CD ISO, someone wrote a script for that (SPARC, anyway) some time back, and I had written a C program (and IIRC posted it to Usenet - try groups.google.com) to do the job too. Once thus extracted, one could use lofiadm on the resulting individual files. IIRC, it doesn't extract the slice at the start of the ISO, since one could get that one by using lofiadm on the original ISO. To save anyone the trouble of digging it up, see http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.solaris/browse_thread/thread/39f9de148ed0df23/6ad98d95e58 bf59c?lnk=stq=group%3Acomp.unix.solaris+iso+slices#6ad98d95e58bf59c for a thread about some of this. When I did my lofi crypto prototype I also hacked in a -o option which pretty much does what you want. Not sure if that is still available; I think it would still be very useful. Casper ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] common ( Win64/Linux/SNV/UNIX ) filesystem du
On Dec 9, 2007 8:11 PM, Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The next question is how to create a single filesystem on a USB attached device ( like a USB Stick from SanDisk or Kingston etc ) where the filesystem is supported and read/write functional on all of Win32/Win64/Linux and Solaris/UNIX. I don't think that NTFS is worth looking at because it is closed and proprietary. Microsoft could bork that up at a whim without telling anyone. The only two others I see are old world FAT nd FAT32. The FAT type filesystem is too small and restricted for anything real world. That leaves FAT32. Am I missing anything ? Any suggestions ? Dennis, As long as your media is less than 32GB FAT32 should be ok. Another possibility is UDF. Although last time I check Windows considered it to be read-only (that was quite some time ago and I am not sure what is the status today) Thank you Cyril. Long time no hear by the way. I hope that things are well with you. I am currently testing with the following OS selections : (1) Solaris Nevada SNV_78 (2) Windows Vista Business Edition 64-bit (3) Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 AS 64-bit (4) Microsoft Server 2008 32-bit ( Longhorn build 6001 ) I think that UDF is a forward looking and standards compliant filesystem[1] and thus I wonder if Microsoft supports it at all. I think that the Microsoft OS may be able to mount the filesystem but only Solaris or RHEL/CentOS will be able to actually do the mkfs stage. Not sure. I'll experiment and see how it goes. Dennis Clarke [1] n.b.: ZFS works fine on USB devices but we know that Vista/Longhorn will choke on it. For now anyways. According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Disk_Format#Spared_.28RW.29_flavor Vista (but not earlier Windows) can read and write certain versions of UDF (a superset of those Solaris can read and write, apparently). I don't have any personal knowledge of the accuracy of that page... This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How do I update my bugreport?
Patrick Ale wrote: Hi guys, I filed a bug last week, I got an email yesterday saying the bug has changed status to incomplete and if I could please give more information acording to the filled in fields by the engineer working on the bug. I'd love to do that but... how do I do this? I can't even find my bug back in the database :s You can't - only a Sun engineer can, and since the external e-mail now censors the name/e-mail of the bug updater, you have no way of knowing. The best I know of you can do is post to the mailing list of the appropriate community group, or a generic list like opensolaris-bugs, and ask for your bug report to be updated by a Sun employee. -- -Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How do I update my bugreport?
On Dec 11, 2007 4:59 PM, Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Patrick Ale wrote: Hi guys, Hi Alan! Well I know who's working on the case, it's Brian. I have his email address and he is helping me a lot a already, James gave me some pointers as well. Thank you all :) Patrick / WickedWicky ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] PulseAudio
For the record, Solaris is listed as a supported platform: http://www.pulseaudio.org/wiki/AboutPulseAudio Which is a huge joke, because it uses the wrong type of ioctl structs (those with the additional fields that Solaris doesn't support) and doesn't even wrap them in #ifdefs. To compile PulseAudio, you need to change quite a few other things too, besides what SFE patches. -mg ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris with iSCSI Luns and IPMP 3 x 1 Gbe eth SAN . Is it sensib
Thanks Ux-Admin, I am intensively workign out on all these, and also i will be conducting a test with new nemo drivers, and dladm aggregation. So let me see how does aggregation work out, and as far as i see there architecture, it should support, in-load spread very well, because the virtual aggregated interface receives packets from all the interfaces in the group, forming the aggregated interface , but i am not sure how re-ordering for tcp is handled though. -- Chandan This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] PulseAudio
I talked to Lennart during the week, and he's keen to see PulseAudio in Solaris as well. He mentioned that the feature set would be significantly reduced since OSS (when integrated) won't nearly provide as much capability as Alsa does on Linux, but confirmed it does work fine on Solaris already. I'm sorry if I look like a Negative Nancy, but that's a load of crap based on his hate against OSS. One of the points of a pure software mixer (which is what PulseAudio is) is that all processing, mixing, effects, channel assignments and whatever else is controlled by and lies on the software side and doesn't require more than a bunch of dumb output channels without even proper volume control. I don't really see the point of an audio server, if the native audio interface very well supports software mixing itself. Maybe not as sophisticated as PulseAudio, but that type of sophistication is more sugar coating than practical. -mg ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris with iSCSI Luns and IPMP 3 x 1 Gbe eth SAN . Is it sensib
Hey John, Thanks for reply guru ... yes i was about to test sun trunking, But that workes only with sun's hardware with hard coded support, like ce , qfe etc etc ... but not bge, pcn, rtls , e1000 etc.. But, i found nemo drivers work with the other ones well, and also we can aggregate more than four interfaces, in case of trunking software max is four only.. and other thing i want to ask you, what strategy do i use on switch... because even managed switches ( form cisco etc ) does not do aggregation of ports on there side efficiently ) .. So may be for switch i have to think of something else... please let me know your valuable suggestions on that part too.. i am seeing how all your guidance is helping me to tune and evolve my implementation .. if nothign works, ( please dont laugh ) , i am thinking to use a unix box with some 6 or 8 GBE interfaces for switch too lol ... normal mother boards come with 3 pci slots, and i will put quad port Gigabit ethernet cards availabel form intel, in all three slots.. and if i aggregate three ports each and make a 4 port switch ( with each port capable of doing 3 GBPS -- taht is 6 GBPS including both ways ) tahn beautiful... )0 also we can use cat6 for cabling , as it is not a problem , and will easily support this speed, because afterall its three different cables too, working together right beautiful, i think we will be able to implement very good iscsi based san guys,, thanks so so s much for all you help... also now PGR is supported from opensolaris build 74 on wards and Jim has already told me this and even i too verified ( Thanks Jim... Fore those who dint know , Jim Dunham, from Storage Platform Software Group at sun ) . Wow... yeahhhahah ... I am floating... One way or the other i will get this done and will definitely share with make a note of complete detail;s of commands and procedures, and will produce to you all for further tuning and evolution .. -- Chandan This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris with iSCSI Luns and IPMP 3 x 1 Gbe eth SAN . Is it sens
Hi James That's not quite true. IPMP's inbound load spreading makes use of multiple data addresses in a group. When we make outbound connections to multiple peers and there are multiple data addresses, we'll intentionally round-robin select among those addresses to use as source addresses, each with a separate MAC address. That allows the return traffic to be spread among the available links. The other part of the picture is DNS. For spreading of inbound connections, you should insert all of the data addresses as IN A records for a single name, and configure your server so that it does round-robin responses. (If the peers are Solaris, disabling or configuring nscd may be necessary.) Can you please tell em a bit more about this, how can IPMP make inbound spreading, because i saw in documentation that test IPs are used explicitly for test pings and availability check only.. so.. i was not able to comprehend, it will be helpful , if you can help me understand, Humble Regards, -- chandan Maddanna. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris with iSCSI Luns and IPMP 3 x 1 Gbe eth SAN . Is it sens
Chandan Maddanna writes: Hi James That's not quite true. IPMP's inbound load spreading makes use of multiple data addresses in a group. When we make outbound connections to multiple peers and there are multiple data addresses, we'll intentionally round-robin select among those addresses to use as source addresses, each with a separate MAC address. That allows the return traffic to be spread among the available links. The other part of the picture is DNS. For spreading of inbound connections, you should insert all of the data addresses as IN A records for a single name, and configure your server so that it does round-robin responses. (If the peers are Solaris, disabling or configuring nscd may be necessary.) Can you please tell em a bit more about this, how can IPMP make inbound spreading, You need to use multiple data addresses. because i saw in documentation that test IPs are used explicitly for test pings and availability check only. That's correct; test addresses have nothing to do with it. . so.. i was not able to comprehend, it will be helpful , if you can help me understand, Here's an example using test addresses on the 10.0.0.0/24 subnet, and data addresses on 192.168.0.0/24. ifconfig hme0 plumb 10.0.0.1/24 broadcast + deprecated -failover \ group ipmp0 up ifconfig hme0 addif 192.168.0.1/24 broadcast + up ifconfig hme1 plumb 10.0.0.2/24 broadcast + deprecated -failover \ group ipmp0 up ifconfig hme1 addif 192.168.0.2/24 broadcast + up This gives you two test addresses (one each on hme0 and hme1), and two data addresses (one each on hme0:1 and hme1:1). On outbound connections, and where the socket is not already bound, we'll select among the available data addresses first, meaning that we'll pick 192.168.0.1 as our source when going to some destinations, and 192.168.0.2 when going to others. The use of two different IP addresses -- and a different MAC address for each -- causes the traffic coming back in to be spread between the links. Then, to complete the picture, you'll probably want to have load spreading for the inbound connections as well. To do this, you'll need to use multiple addresses for the server. For example, in the named configuration, you might have something like this: server IN A 192.168.0.1 IN A 192.168.0.2 This specifies that server in the current domain resolves as two addresses. By default, BIND9 should return them in cyclic (round-robin) order, but check your documentation if necessary. Note that DNS caching on the client systems (the ones generating that inbound traffic) can sometimes interfere with this mechanism. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] PHP with Apache in build 77
I'm trying to configure and use the PHP 5.2.4 that is delivered with SXCE 77 (/usr/php5) with Apache as delivered (/usr/Apache). Apache runs fine locally but when I try to add in libphp5.so, I get an unresolved symbol for apr_pool_cleanup_null. Am I missing a dependency or have I otherwise misconfigured things? Below is script output showing my setup after minimizing the changes I've made from the distributed config files. Besides setting up httpd.conf, I copied /usr/php5/5.2.4/lib/libphp5-5.2.4.so over to /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so. Note too: it looks to me that the build options for php have the configuration file path set to the build environment, not the running system. I don't think I get that far to even be looking for the php.ini file, but I think that'll be a problem too (which I can workaround with dummy directories and symlinks if need be). I'm very happy to see a more complete web stack coming with SXCE-- now I just need to get it to work :). Eric === Script started on Tue Dec 11 11:25:13 2007 $ /usr/php5/5.2.4/bin/php --ini Configuration File (php.ini) Path: /builds2/sfwnv-gate/proto/root_i386/etc/php5/5.2.4 Loaded Configuration File: (none) Scan for additional .ini files in: (none) Additional .ini files parsed: (none) $ exit script done on Tue Dec 11 11:25:36 2007 Script started on Tue Dec 11 11:47:14 2007 # /usr/apache/bin/httpd -V Server version: Apache/1.3.39 (Unix) Server built: Oct 30 2007 00:23:49 Server's Module Magic Number: 19990320:18 Server compiled with -D EAPI -D HAVE_MMAP -D USE_MMAP_SCOREBOARD -D USE_MMAP_FILES -D NO_LINGCLOSE -D HAVE_FCNTL_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT -D HAVE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT -D HAVE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT -D DYNAMIC_MODULE_LIMIT=64 -D HARD_SERVER_LIMIT=2048 -D HTTPD_ROOT=/usr/apache -D SUEXEC_BIN=/usr/apache/bin/suexec -D DEFAULT_PIDLOG=/var/run/apache/httpd.pid -D DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD=/var/run/apache/httpd.scoreboard -D DEFAULT_LOCKFILE=/var/run/apache/httpd.lock -D DEFAULT_ERRORLOG=/var/apache/logs/error_log -D TYPES_CONFIG_FILE=/etc/apache/mime.types -D SERVER_CONFIG_FILE=/etc/apache/httpd.conf -D ACCESS_CONFIG_FILE=/etc/apache/access.conf -D RESOURCE_CONFIG_FILE=/etc/apache/srm.conf # # diff -c /etc/apache/httpd.conf /etc/apache/httpd.conf-example *** /etc/apache/httpd.confTue Dec 11 11:41:06 2007 --- /etc/apache/httpd.conf-exampleTue Oct 30 00:25:11 2007 *** *** 252,260 LoadModule ssl_module libexec/libssl.so /IfDefine LoadModule perl_modulelibexec/libperl.so - LoadModule php5_modulelibexec/libphp5.so - # Reconstruction of the complete module list from all available modules # (static and shared ones) to achieve correct module execution order. # [WHENEVER YOU CHANGE THE LOADMODULE SECTION ABOVE UPDATE THIS, TOO] --- 252,258 *** *** 302,308 AddModule mod_ssl.c /IfDefine AddModule mod_perl.c - AddModule mod_php5.c # # ExtendedStatus controls whether Apache will generate full status --- 300,305 *** *** 367,373 # e-mailed. This address appears on some server-generated pages, such # as error documents. # ! ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # ServerName allows you to set a host name which is sent back to clients for --- 364,370 # e-mailed. This address appears on some server-generated pages, such # as error documents. # ! ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # ServerName allows you to set a host name which is sent back to clients for *** *** 385,391 # machine always knows itself by this address. If you use Apache strictly for # local testing and development, you may use 127.0.0.1 as the server name. # ! ServerName arusha # # DocumentRoot: The directory out of which you will serve your --- 382,388 # machine always knows itself by this address. If you use Apache strictly for # local testing and development, you may use 127.0.0.1 as the server name. # ! ServerName 127.0.0.1 # # DocumentRoot: The directory out of which you will serve your *** *** 873,879 # make certain files to be certain types. # AddType application/x-tar .tgz - AddType application/x-httpd-php .php # # AddEncoding allows you to have certain browsers uncompress --- 870,875 # # /usr/apache/bin/httpd -t Syntax error on line 255 of /etc/apache/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so into server: ld.so.1: httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so: symbol apr_pool_cleanup_null: referenced symbol not found # exit script done on Tue Dec 11 11:48:24 2007 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris with iSCSI Luns and IPMP 3 x 1 Gbe eth SAN . Is it sens
Beautiful, Crisp and elegant example.. Thanks Very Very much James, -- Chandan Maddanna This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] PHP with Apache in build 77
/usr/php5/5.2.4/lib/libphp5-5.2.4.so over to /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so. Why in blue blazes did they compile it for /usr/php5/? I mean, PHP doesn't clash with anything Solaris delivers... they could have stuck him directly into /usr/bin and /usr/lib/? But I agree with you, seeing PHP5 brings us closer to having Solaris be the workhorse behind mighty webservers. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] PHP with Apache in build 77
Cannot load /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so into server: ld.so.1: httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so: symbol apr_pool_cleanup_null: referenced symbol not found Please do: ldd /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so and post the output here. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] PHP with Apache in build 77
Here's the output of ldd /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so: libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 libexpat.so.0 = /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0 librt.so.1 = /lib/librt.so.1 libresolv.so.2 = /lib/libresolv.so.2 libm.so.2 = /lib/libm.so.2 libnsl.so.1 = /lib/libnsl.so.1 libsocket.so.1 = /lib/libsocket.so.1 libxml2.so.2 = /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 libssl.so.0.9.8 = /usr/sfw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 libcrypto.so.0.9.8 = /usr/sfw/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 libdl.so.1 = /lib/libdl.so.1 libc.so.1 = /lib/libc.so.1 libmp.so.2 = /lib/libmp.so.2 libmd.so.1 = /lib/libmd.so.1 libscf.so.1 = /lib/libscf.so.1 libpthread.so.1 = /lib/libpthread.so.1 libuutil.so.1 = /lib/libuutil.so.1 libgen.so.1 = /lib/libgen.so.1 libssl_extra.so.0.9.8 = /usr/sfw/lib/libssl_extra.so.0.9.8 libcrypto_extra.so.0.9.8 = /usr/sfw/lib/libcrypto_extra.so.0.9.8 Thanks for your help. Eric ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Equivalent of OBP 'probe-scsi-all' from inside solaris on x86?
Hi all, I have a server with 2 FCAL cards. Each card has 2 ports. There are 4 cables running into these 4 ports. There are 4 other cables that are currently unused. I know there's supposed to be some redundancy in how the SAN is setup,but it's out of my control, and I the person to ask isn't around right now. It's my understanding that 4 of the cables should see one set of disks, and 4 should see another set. I'd like to get 2 cables from each of the 2 sets and leave 2 cables in each set for a later date. So I'm trying to figure out which disks are seen via which cables? So far Solaris only sees 1 controller 'c0', and see's 18 disks, pretty much no matter which 4 cables I plug in. Is there an easier way to do this? If not something like 'probe-scsi-all', is there something like 'snoop' for FCAL? -Kyle ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Laptop testing OpenSolaris (Indiana) on ODM laptops
Well, maybe if the Sun licensing meant I got a free one :) Otherwise, that form factor really isn't my cup of tea at all. Cheeri, Calum. Well, we have very different understandings of the term Sun licensing (do you think Sun will allow the Asus EeePCs to use its name as is?) :-) The EeePCs do look faddy on the outside: http://taiwan.cnet.com/digilife/0,289053,20126344,00.htm i.e., until you open the lid (both the LED screen and the OS do not really appeal to professionals). Everex is coming out with an UMPC with a similar form factor: http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS6962839488.html Can't comment on it until I actually look at one. However, I am curious if there is a possibility of a SunRay-type nano-notebook? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Send Link in Firefox
Review and Install the latest patches, the 10u4 with out patches had a mime type issue in gnome with thunderbird: This was a Bug ID6608688 Synopsisgnome mime types not defined for in line url within mail message body Thunderbird even though it was a duplicate of not being able to read the readme link 6565136 This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] snv_b78 download ready?
Any news on the snv_b78 download? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
