On 02/26/2012 02:08 PM, John Jackson wrote:
It's just another LL intentionally fuzzy policy.
This allows them to make whatever ruling they like when the time comes and
claim it has been stated Policy.
You will not get any real clarification.
At an inworld meeting, Oz has given the third
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:11:19 +0100
Tillie Ariantho til...@xp2.de wrote:
On 25.02.2012 19:24, Adeon Writer wrote:
It wouldn't disallow derendering, since others on TPV's and others
on official see it the same way (ie, they both see nothing happen
at all and it doesn't violate privacy)
Yes, you're mistaken. The key phrase there is alters the shared
experience of the virtual world. A tpv can alter individual user's
experiences, (UI, build tools, controls, graphics enhancements) but not
the shared experience of the world. IE, exposing information such as
the friend online
Guess its how you interpreted it wheww.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Cinder Roxley cin...@cinderblocks.bizwrote:
Yes, you're mistaken. The key phrase there is alters the shared
experience of the virtual world. A tpv can alter individual user's
experiences, (UI, build tools, controls,
Actually, under 2.k, features like breast physics, secondary attachments,
shared parcel WL etc, would have never been permitted to exist. And this
means that any feature in the future to which a TPV may conjur up, which
effects the shared experience (Ie. something one user could see but another
