Tom Zerucha wrote:
I had SSLeay 0.9's crypto portion ported (basically PilotSSLeay plus
more algorithms). This using gcc.
It required a lot of patches so is not a clean set of just compiler
options or such, and didn't do SSL since I am using it for OpenPGP.
OpenSSL 0.9.1c worked more
Ben Laurie wrote:
Tom Zerucha wrote:
I had SSLeay 0.9's crypto portion ported (basically PilotSSLeay plus
more algorithms). This using gcc.
It required a lot of patches so is not a clean set of just compiler
options or such, and didn't do SSL since I am using it for OpenPGP.
BTW Does anybody know how the MS Authenticode Timestamping Service
provided by Verisign works?
Manuel Mollar schrieb:
Hi,
We have developed an experimental Timestamping service based entirely on SMIME.
It includes a timestamping service of web objects, that perhaps someone will find
Hmm. What would be the advantage of that ?
I mean, to do anything serious with it (ie connection to the outside
world) you'd need to connect it via serial cable to some PC or
Workstation. And that neccessarily involves a daemon to handle the
connection between the PalmPilot and the rest of
Holger Reif wrote:
BTW Does anybody know how the MS Authenticode Timestamping Service
provided by Verisign works?
Yes. You feed it a DER encoded simple structure which does little more
than wrap a signature and you get back a PKCS#7 signed data structure
for use in a countersignature.
This sounds EXACTLY like what I ran across - right down to the mask values
and missing bit (low bit of 2nd nibble is missing).
All I had to do was call SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh () after creating the context
(SSL_CTX_new()). See "s_server.c" in the "apps" directory, and use the code
in the function
Hi,
Does Apache handle complex subject DNs? For example, CN=user1 +
empid=2345, ou=test, o=company. When I get the user dn from apache it
seems to turn the subject dn into the following: CN=user1, empid=2345,
ou=test, o=company. The + sign becomes a comma and hence the complex
attribute CN
Thanks bill, your comments were informative, your assumptions correct,
and your advice on how to address the problem was exact enough for me to
be able to get things working inside 2 minutes. I have to be impressed
with that ;-)
I hope the person who posted the original 'HELP for ' message
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 10:12:46AM +0200, Oscar Jacobsson wrote:
I'm afraid I don't have access to a Borland compiler, so I don't know if
I can be os much help here, unfortunately. :-(
Borland has made its command-line compiler tools freely available:
Borland has made its command-line compiler tools freely available:
http://www.borland.com/bcppbuilder/freecompiler
It's not quite free, they make you run a serious gauntlet of registation and
logging and cookies and javascript before you can finally get a copy. It'd
be less painful if they
Hello,
I originally posted to openssl-users, but
I've just realized that there exists and
openssl-dev mailing list and this question
is more on-topic for the dev list anyway.
I'm having some problems in compiling
my SSL application. I get the following linker errors (Using GCC 2.9.x and a
Has anyone had any success with HPux 11.0?
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager
Braun Brelin wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I originally posted to openssl-users, but
I've just realized that there exists and
openssl-dev mailing list and this question
is more on-topic for the dev list anyway.
It isn't.
It is a general C/ linking problem
You can solve it reading the build line
Hi there,
could you please tell me, what the BIO's are that are used in the ssltest?
I understand they behave like non-blocking sockets, but are they
'just' blocking sockets or something else?
This is REALLY important to me as I absolutely need something to replace
sockets to establish an
First of all, BIOs by themselves are not blocking or non-blocking. It is the
underlying file descriptor that is blocking or non-blocking. Thus, u can
have a blocking BIO as well as a non-blocking BIO. I haven't used BIOs
myself, but I believe they are some kind of a wrapper on the SSL struct and
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Arun Venkataraman wrote:
First of all, BIOs by themselves are not blocking or non-blocking. It is the
underlying file descriptor that is blocking or non-blocking. Thus, u can
have a blocking BIO as well as a non-blocking BIO. I haven't used BIOs
myself, but I believe
Hmm. What would be the advantage of that ?
I mean, to do anything serious with it (ie connection to the outside
world) you'd need to connect it via serial cable to some PC or
Workstation.
OpenSSL's crypto libraries would allow a pilot to perform tasks
performed by cryptographic
From: "Braun Brelin" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bbrelin I originally posted to openssl-users, but
bbrelin I've just realized that there exists and
bbrelin openssl-dev mailing list and this question
bbrelin is more on-topic for the dev list anyway.
You're wrong, this list is about developing OpenSSL
18 matches
Mail list logo
