From: Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jaltman Then I call RAND_status() which in turn calls RAND_poll().
jaltman This second time the call takes over 60 seconds. This
jaltman appears to be caused by the walking of the heap. Between the
jaltman time the RAND_screen() is called and
From: Phillip Porch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
root Compiles fine with SCO Openserver 5.0.5 and the native cc. The
root test suite ran without errors also.
And I saw your report on the same platform with gcc. Noted in the
STATUS file. Thanks.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 08:39:02AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
From: Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jaltman Then I call RAND_status() which in turn calls RAND_poll().
jaltman This second time the call takes over 60 seconds. This
jaltman appears to be caused by the walking
OpenSSL 0.9.6-beta1 11 Sep 2000
built on: Tue Sep 12 07:22:18 GMT 2000
platform: FreeBSD
options: bn(64,32) md2(int) rc4(idx,int) des(ptr,risc1,16,long)
idea(int) blowfish(idx)
compiler: gcc -DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -m486 -Wall
-DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM
`test' is up
jaltman My guess is that the PCURSORINFO reference on line 139 can be left
jaltman undefined by the compiler since it is part of the parameter list a
jaltman function typedef. Until the parametersactually need to be checked it
jaltman can be safely ignored.
jaltman
jaltman
The beta release build cleanly and test is passed on Slackware 7.0
OpenSSL self-test report:
OpenSSL version: 0.9.6-beta1
Last change: Add a few more EBCDIC conditionals that make `req' and
...
OS (uname): Linux linux 2.2.14 #10 Wed Feb 2 03:23:16 SGT 2000
i586 unknown
OS (config):
Hi,
We'd like to submit the following patch to OpenSSL, which allows you to
specify the directoryName format for X509v3 extensions such as
subjectAltName, crlDistributionPoints, etc. It parses RFC2253-style
distinguished names, so you can specify something like the following in your
Oliver King wrote:
specify the directoryName format for X509v3 extensions such as
subjectAltName, crlDistributionPoints, etc. It parses RFC2253-style
distinguished names,
[..]
[ crldp1 ]
DirName = CN=myhost,O=myorg,C=GB
URI = http://www.myhost.com/myca.crl
Can you send me some test
jaltman Do you really want to search through 14MB of data each time
jaltman this routine is called?
Well, that actually depends on what the real issue is. I mean, this
is likely to happen only once in the life of a program. I understand
that if it's a client program it might start
Sorry for duplicatesIf there is any additional info you need, just let
me know!
- Bob
--
Bob Burns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 11:26:51AM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
[Detailed description of Windows HEAP properties deleted]
Now, we can discuss whether the design decision is a good one, and with the
side effect given on windows (a startup time of a client of 1 minute as you
described is
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
What my code does is call RAND_status() to determine whether or not
random data needs to be computed. Does RAND_status() no longer simply
provide a test, but instead performs entropy gathering?
RAND_status() simply provides a test, but the RAND
** Vanilla RedHat Linux 6.0 (2.2.12-20 kernel) on Pent. Pro 200
Whoops! Should have been 6.1.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
What you are saying is that RAND_status() is going to call RAND_poll()
regardless of whether or not the PRNG has been seeded. In other
words, you are saying that you do not trust (and I don't really blame
you) the application author to know how to
Thanks for the suggestions. Right now it doesn't quite work the way it
was intended. I don't have much time at the moment, but if nobody else
does it, I'll try to fix it for beta2.
Thanks.
I would be happy to do the necessary work for this and several other
projects (adding Kerberos 5
I've attached a test certificate that has a crlDistributionPoints extension
with two entries. One is a URL, as supported by the existing OpenSSL code,
and the other is a directoryName entry (implemented by the patch).
Hope this helps.
Cheers
Ollie
-Original Message-
From: Michael
Quoting from Peter Gutmann's paper when he describes the use of the
ToolHelp library:
"Since even a moderately loaded system can contain over 500 heap
objects and 50 modules, we need to limit the duration of the poll
to a second or two, which is enough to get information on several
hello everybody,
seems as if ld doesn't like me...
is gmtime_r an openssl Symbol or should the System provide it?
src/openssl-0.9.6-beta1/apps'
rm -f openssl
gcc -o openssl -DMONOLITH -I../include -DTHREADS -DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN
-fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -m486 -Wall openssl.o verify.o
Oliver King wrote:
Hi,
We'd like to submit the following patch to OpenSSL, which allows you to
specify the directoryName format for X509v3 extensions such as
subjectAltName, crlDistributionPoints, etc. It parses RFC2253-style
distinguished names, so you can specify something like the
Successful build of make make test of openssl-0.9.6-beta1.tar.gz on
LinuxPPC 2000.
built on: Tue Sep 12 15:58:54 EDT 2000
platform: linux-ppc
options: bn(64,32) md2(int) rc4(ptr,int) des(idx,cisc,4,long)
idea(int) blowfish(idx)
compiler: gcc -DTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DB_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3
tests passed
test a^b%c implementations
./exptest
...
...
done
cat
./p ./p.clear differ: char 2, line
From: Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jaltman My guess is that the PCURSORINFO reference on line 139 can be left
jaltman undefined by the compiler since it is part of the parameter list a
jaltman function typedef. Until the parametersactually need to be checked it
jaltman can be safely
From: Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jaltman That is true, but NOWINABLE is not defined. I added
jaltman
jaltman #ifndef NOWINABLE
jaltman if (cursor) {
jaltman ...
jaltman }
jaltman #endif
jaltman
jaltman and the code still compiled and generated the error. I went
From: Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jaltman That is true, but NOWINABLE is not defined. I added
jaltman
jaltman #ifndef NOWINABLE
jaltman if (cursor) {
jaltman ...
jaltman }
jaltman #endif
jaltman
jaltman and the code still compiled and generated the
The problem with the missing decalration of CURSORINFO is the value of
WINVER. WINVER (for compatibility with NT) is defined as 0x0400. But
the support for GetCursorInfo() was not added until NT4 SP5 and
therefore it requires a WINVER value of 0x0500 in order to be used.
#define WINVER
From: Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jaltman #ifndef CURSOR_SHOWING
jaltman /*
jaltman * Information about the global cursor.
jaltman */
jaltman typedef struct tagCURSORINFO
jaltman {
jaltman DWORD cbSize;
jaltman DWORD flags;
jaltman HCURSOR hCursor;
jaltman
From: Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Beta 1 errors on Win32
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 18:29:00 EDT
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jaltman From: Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jaltman
jaltman jaltman #ifndef CURSOR_SHOWING
jaltman jaltman /*
jaltman jaltman * Information about
Except that Borland C gives a warning because it PCURSORINFO is still
present in the function type that defines cursor. That's what started
all this...
Just define the function pointer prototype without the reference to
PCURSORINFO. Borland C has no idea what type the function pointer
From: Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jaltman #ifndef CURSOR_SHOWING
jaltman /*
jaltman * Information about the global cursor.
jaltman */
jaltman typedef struct tagCURSORINFO
jaltman {
jaltman DWORD cbSize;
jaltman DWORD flags;
jaltman HCURSOR hCursor;
jaltman POINT
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
From: Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jaltman It appears that someone decided to replace function
jaltman declarations from 0.9.5 with macros in 0.9.6.
Ah, the pletora of stack functions.
jaltman This should never be done, in fact no public APIs
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 11:26:51AM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
[Detailed description of Windows HEAP properties deleted]
I understand that the problem seems to be caused mostly by the behaviour
of RAND_status(), as it implicitly calls RAND_poll(), when used for the
first time. The same
31 matches
Mail list logo
