Re: Doing own nonblocking socket I/O

2000-10-31 Thread Bodo Moeller
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 06:17:20PM +, Ben Laurie wrote: Dan Kegel wrote: I do still think Ben is trusting select a bit too much; real servers that must avoid blocking really do set sockets to nonblocking mode just in case. How many times do I have to say "I agree"? I agree. Do it!

Problem with Win98 and Outlook client: rollback attack

2000-10-31 Thread Robert Chastain
Hello, I asked this question on openssl-users but got no response so I thought I'd take a shot on dev: I've been using OpenSSL 0.95 and 0.96 with stunnel to successfully encrypt pop3 and smtp connections from Windows NT and 98 machines running Outlook and Outlook Express. My problem is that

Re: [Adrian Bunk: Bug#65368: libssl09 must go to non-US/non-free]

2000-10-31 Thread Christoph Martin
Bob Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In OpenBSD, we just removed the offending code and stubbed the functions to fail. So IDEA isn't in-tree. RSA similarly used to be stubbed to fail. So - if I understand right - you are distributing changed sources? Christoph --

Re: Doing own nonblocking socket I/O

2000-10-31 Thread Ben Laurie
Bodo Moeller wrote: On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 06:17:20PM +, Ben Laurie wrote: Dan Kegel wrote: I do still think Ben is trusting select a bit too much; real servers that must avoid blocking really do set sockets to nonblocking mode just in case. How many times do I have to say

Re: new engine

2000-10-31 Thread Geoff Thorpe
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Libor Krystek wrote: I'am creating new engine for other hardware. This hardware must be initialized before using but for its initialization I need input some parameters (e.g. hostname, username, password). Function ENGINE_init(ENGINE *e) call engine function init() and

Re: Patches against 20001027 SNAP for IRIX shared libraries

2000-10-31 Thread Albert Chin-A-Young
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 12:41:20PM -0600, Albert Chin-A-Young wrote: The following patch adds support for shared libraries on IRIX. And it also changes "true64-unix" to "tru64-unix". -- snip snip --- Configure.origSat Oct 28 10:20:51 2000 +++ Configure Sun Oct 29 12:35:17 2000 @@

Re: new engine

2000-10-31 Thread Libor Krystek
Geoff Thorpe wrote: ENGINE_ctrl(); make your "init()" handler fail (setting an explanatory error) unless ENGINE_ctrl() has already been called to pass in everything you need. ENGINE_init() is used to get a "functional" reference, not just a "structural" one. Eg. ENGINE_by_id() returns

Re: new engine

2000-10-31 Thread Ben Laurie
Geoff Thorpe wrote: On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Libor Krystek wrote: I'am creating new engine for other hardware. This hardware must be initialized before using but for its initialization I need input some parameters (e.g. hostname, username, password). Function ENGINE_init(ENGINE *e) call

Re: new engine

2000-10-31 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
From: Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] ben Does that answer your question? ben ben Leaves me with one - if specific engines have to be initialised "by ben hand", then we haven't got much in the way of abstraction, have we? Is ben there a better way? Config files? External programs? Depends on

Re: new engine

2000-10-31 Thread Goetz Babin-Ebell
Ben Laurie wrote: Geoff Thorpe wrote: On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Libor Krystek wrote: I'am creating new engine for other hardware. This hardware must be initialized before using but for its initialization I need input some parameters (e.g. hostname, username, password). Function

Re: new engine

2000-10-31 Thread Ben Laurie
Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote: Ben Laurie wrote: Geoff Thorpe wrote: On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Libor Krystek wrote: I'am creating new engine for other hardware. This hardware must be initialized before using but for its initialization I need input some parameters (e.g. hostname,

Re: new engine

2000-10-31 Thread Ben Laurie
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: From: Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] ben Does that answer your question? ben ben Leaves me with one - if specific engines have to be initialised "by ben hand", then we haven't got much in the way of abstraction, have we? Is ben there a better way?

Re: new engine

2000-10-31 Thread Ben Laurie
Libor Krystek wrote: Geoff Thorpe wrote: ENGINE_ctrl(); make your "init()" handler fail (setting an explanatory error) unless ENGINE_ctrl() has already been called to pass in everything you need. ENGINE_init() is used to get a "functional" reference, not just a "structural"

Re: new engine

2000-10-31 Thread Geoff Thorpe
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Ben Laurie wrote: Yes, your answer is satisfactory. If I understand then I can't use openssl.exe main application for testing my new engine (of course after compilation of openssl with new engine features). Exactly, and this is wrong and bad. We should fix it.

Hi, I need a help on x.509 test program...

2000-10-31 Thread
Hi, I'm graduated student of Seoul, Korea. I am now doing some term project in my lab to construct small system that can be used in internet banking. Using openssl-0.95a, I could construct most part of it. Using openssl's crytpo as a library, and converting the test program