Re: [PATCH] argument passing to app_verify_callback

I see no problem adding this patch. Queued. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-733-72 88 11 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PATCH] argument passing to app_verify_callback

Alas, I meant to send this in weeks ago, before it was too late for 0.9.7... This is a patch to actually hand the user-supplied argument into calls to app_verify_callback. It affects the following 5 files: ssl/ssl.h ssl/ssl_cert.c ssl/ssl_lib.c ssl/ssltest.c test/testssl In the first three

Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/engine hw_sureware.c

Dr S N Henson wrote: Ben Laurie wrote: Hmm. You did this with a different name from me (idx instead of index_) - isn't that going to be irritating? I hadn't realised someone else had come across this. It should be consistent I suppose. Personally I always find variable names with

Re: [PATCH] argument passing to app_verify_callback

D. K. Smetters wrote: This is a patch to actually hand the user-supplied argument into calls to app_verify_callback. It affects the following 5 files: I've no objections to this patch. As long as there's an argument there we might as well use it. There is a way to pass application

Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/objects obj_dat.h obj_mac.h obj_mac.num objects.txt

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: levitte 16-Feb-2002 13:17:14 Modified:crypto/objects Tag: OpenSSL_0_9_7-stable obj_dat.h obj_mac.h obj_mac.num objects.txt Log: Adjust the NID names for the AES modes OFB and CFB to contain the number of feedback bits

0.9.7-snap 15/2/02

Hi Guys! I've tested 0.9.7snap-14 15 on my p3-linux (sort of originally redhat 6.2) and it works just fine... no bother. however on our freebsd4.2 machine testing snap15 out of the box - ie untar it... and ./config and make... it breaks as TERMIO is defined and it appears that it shouldn't

Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/objects obj_dat.h obj_mac.hobj_mac.num objects.txt

From: Dr S N Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] stephen.henson While this is what is done with other ciphers I'd stephen.henson argue that it isn't strictly speaking correct. The NID stephen.henson is tied to an ASN1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER (OID). The OID stephen.henson (at least for CFB mode) doesn't represent

Re: 0.9.7 approaching

Are you in the US BTW if so can you resend you patch with a CC: to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm in Canada... -- Harald Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] It takes a child to raze a village. -Michael T. Fry __ OpenSSL

Re: 0.9.7 approaching

Harald Koch wrote: Are you in the US BTW if so can you resend you patch with a CC: to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm in Canada... OK, I've checked in a fix which should do what you want. Let me know of any problems. Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk/