I'm trying encrypt and then decrypt a message, for
example: I'm making a test using the RSA algorithm
of openssl library but the result wasn't the original
message. I read something about the length message
must be greater than the modulus but I don't
understand very well. I also read something
Dr S N Henson,
First I want to thank you for the answer.
Secondly, you mentioned in your answer that I should use version 0.9.7.
I can't seem to find the 0.9.7 on openssl.org.
where can I get d/l it from?
Cheers
==
Benzy Gabay
RD
Maya Software Technologies Ltd.
Benzy Gabay wrote:
Dr S N Henson,
First I want to thank you for the answer.
Secondly, you mentioned in your answer that I should use version 0.9.7.
I can't seem to find the 0.9.7 on openssl.org.
where can I get d/l it from?
It hasn't been released yet but you can get development
thomas poindessous wrote:
Hi,
in manpage (version 0.9.6b et version 0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020317),
there is :
--
int EVP_SealFinal(EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx, unsigned char *out,
int *outl);
and
EVP_SealUpdate() and EVP_SealFinal() return 1 for success and 0
Hiya,
This isn't at all serious; it's only in test code, but it might cause
false negatives under pathological circumstances. The code reads :
--8
main()
{
LHASH *conf;
char buf[256];
int i;
conf=lh_new(lh_strhash,strcmp);
for (;;)
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 10:53:05AM -0500, Harald Koch wrote:
objects.txt defines the following:
X509 4 : S : surname
X509 5 : SN: serialNumber
(X509 4 is 2.5.4.4).
RFC2256 defines surname (2.5.4.4) as 'sn', and
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 04:29:29AM +, Justin Fletcher wrote:
Hiya,
This isn't at all serious; it's only in test code, but it might cause
false negatives under pathological circumstances. The code reads :
--8
main()
{
LHASH *conf;
char buf[256];
From: Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jaltman I prefer that des_old.h be compatible with libdes since that apps that
jaltman are built using it assume that the api they were using was constant
jaltman and unchanging.
The way things work now, there is at least no clash with libdes on the
From: Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jaltman I prefer that des_old.h be compatible with libdes since that apps that
jaltman are built using it assume that the api they were using was constant
jaltman and unchanging.
The way things work now, there is at least no clash with libdes on
From: Rodney Thayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rodney I believe this was discussed recently on this list but
rodney I can't put my hands on the message thread. Appologies if this
rodney is redundant.
rodney
rodney It turns out Mixmaster uses the DES routines in OpenSSL.
rodney I tried compiling the
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
From: Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jaltman I prefer that des_old.h be compatible with libdes since that apps that
jaltman are built using it assume that the api they were using was constant
jaltman and unchanging.
The way things work now, there is at
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
From: Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jaltman I prefer that des_old.h be compatible with libdes since that apps that
jaltman are built using it assume that the api they were using was constant
jaltman and unchanging.
The way things work now, there
Hi folks,
there are two problems with shared OpenSSL libraries on Linux for version
0.9.6c as I see it:
The library is installed as libssl.so.0.9.6, so it overwrites libssl-0.9.6[ab]
libraries. But it is not binary compatible IIRC, so applications linked to
it fail and have to be recompiled.
At 09:29 PM 3/21/2002 +, S.Henson wrote:
Is there some particular reason why such applications couldn't use the
EVP layer? An attempt has been made to keep this consistent and to make
any enhancements backwards compatible. In fact some of the more recent
changes would have been substantially
Rodney Thayer wrote:
At 09:29 PM 3/21/2002 +, S.Henson wrote:
Is there some particular reason why such applications couldn't use the
EVP layer? An attempt has been made to keep this consistent and to make
any enhancements backwards compatible. In fact some of the more recent
changes
Thank you for your quick response.
If you just want a simple string extension then you can create an
alias which is effetively saying an extension is identical to another
except it has a different object ID
The nid you create corresponds to an ASN1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER which can be
16 matches
Mail list logo
