bug report: openssl
operating system: HP-UX11
openssl version 0.9.6b, 0.96g and probably 0.7 too.
configuration options:./Configure hpux64-parisc-cc shared no-idea
Description:
BIO_socket_nbio() fails to set sockets to non-blocking mode.
The call succeeds but the socket is still blocking
I
Please test the latest snapshot and answer the questions below. I'm skipping VPATH
discussion for now. I'd like to resolve this ticket soon.
[levitte - Fri Jan 10 16:52:20 2003]:
If you just leave out the -o -type l
you won't make any of the links, and the include/openssl directory
will
I just test, with OpenSSL 0.9.7a-dev (fresh checkout), the command to
generate a self-signed cerificate according to the example in
x509.pod:
openssl x509 -in cert.pem -addtrust sslclient \
-alias Steve's Class 1 CA -out trust.pem
I expected it to fail because it wouldn't find those
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:
I just test, with OpenSSL 0.9.7a-dev (fresh checkout), the command to
generate a self-signed cerificate according to the example in
x509.pod:
openssl x509 -in cert.pem -addtrust sslclient \
-alias Steve's Class 1 CA -out trust.pem
I
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:21:09PM +0100, Marko Asplund via RT wrote:
2) error messages during 'make depend' when not using gcc and makedepend
is installed on the system (HP Ansi C Developer's Bundle, imake
package). seems like this version of makedepend is not supported. maybe
I've analysed this further and the cause seems to be that it bcc 5.5
complains about taking the address of a structure that doesn't have a
complete definition.
For example the following wont compile:
typedef struct FOO_st FOO;
extern FOO bar;
FOO *pbar;
pbar = bar;
but it has no problems on
The example was incorrect. I've committed a change.
This ticket is now resolved. Thanks to Nils Larsch for helping me figure this one out.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jan 14 12:56:55 2003]:
I just test, with OpenSSL 0.9.7a-dev (fresh checkout), the command to
generate a self-signed cerificate
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:49:31
+0100 (MET), Stephen Henson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I've analysed this further and the cause seems to be that it bcc 5.5
rt complains about taking the address of a structure that doesn't have a
rt complete definition.
rt
rt
Hello Richard,
Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
It's unfortunate that cryptoki.h is GPLd, or I would put it in our
contribution area.
GPL is not compatible with the OpenSSL license. Is it possible to get a
different cryptoki.h?
I got the original cryptoki.h which is not GPLd from RSA and is
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:21:09PM +0100, Marko Asplund via RT wrote:
2) error messages during 'make depend' when not using gcc and makedepend
is installed on the system (HP Ansi C Developer's Bundle, imake
package). seems like this
I sent this to openssl-dev previously, but I think it got lost in
the noise there (since it didn't go through rt).
In OpenSSL 0.9.6h, there are a couple of BN_init() bugs in
crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c. The BN_init() calls in question are in the functions:
dsa_do_sign()(lines 113-114)
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 05:12:19PM +0100, Marko Asplund via RT wrote:
this is what 'what makedepend' said on my system (at the time of the above
report):
109] % what /opt/imake/bin/makedepend
/opt/imake/bin/makedepend:
X Window System, Version 11 R6+ HP-UX B.11.00.00 +O2
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:49:31 +0100 (MET), Stephen Henson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I've analysed this further and the cause seems to be that it bcc 5.5
rt complains about taking the address of a structure that
Yes that's what I thought. Any ANSI C experts care to comment on whether
that is legal or not?
It's as legal as this:
extern int foo(int);
int (*fp)(int) = foo;
:)
__
OpenSSL Project
Yes that's what I thought. Any ANSI C experts care to comment on whether
that is legal or not?
It's as legal as this:
extern int foo(int);
int (*fp)(int) = foo;
:)
__
OpenSSL Project
Working on code to read/process and create x509 certificates I encountered
the following.
The following code results in an ASN1_TIME structure with internal length
field
of 14 (date1-length =14).
date1 = ASN1_TIME_new();
ASN1_GENERALIZEDTIME_set_string(date1, 20020819093712);
When
Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
+ sx6, cc:-g -DTERMIOS::(unknown):::SIXTY_FOUR_BIT DES_INT:::,
No optimization? Not even lousy -O?
-g overrides any optimization you give, and i think there's a problem with
the optimizer anyway because with default optimization, aes-128-cbc test fails.
it's
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003, Paul Koster wrote:
Working on code to read/process and create x509 certificates I encountered
the following.
The following code results in an ASN1_TIME structure with internal length
field
of 14 (date1-length =14).
date1 = ASN1_TIME_new();
The following code results in an ASN1_TIME structure with internal
length
field
of 14 (date1-length =14).
date1 = ASN1_TIME_new();
ASN1_GENERALIZEDTIME_set_string(date1, 20020819093712);
When extracting time out an existing certificate however with this
date/time
would result
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003, Paul Koster wrote:
The following code results in an ASN1_TIME structure with internal
length
field
of 14 (date1-length =14).
date1 = ASN1_TIME_new();
ASN1_GENERALIZEDTIME_set_string(date1, 20020819093712);
When extracting time out an existing
OK, since the consensus seems to be a compiler bug and a workaround has
been checked in I'll resolve this ticket.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
That would certainly seem like a good first step.
Have you traced into it at all? I.e. have you run with debug setup and
seen a stack trace s.t. you know the function that is crashing and what
variable is bad (a null pointer or something)? IF so, I may be able to
provide the work around
22 matches
Mail list logo
