Thanks to openssl.org, and Lutz, I have made a client server connection
using DH for key negotiation, and RSA for checking both client and server.
Of course I would like to check the CRL (I use openssl 0.9.7)
I have made an AC certificate, 3 client's certificates; the 3rd is now
invalid in the
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:38:40AM +0100, p b wrote:
Thanks to openssl.org, and Lutz, I have made a client server connection
using DH for key negotiation, and RSA for checking both client and server.
Of course I would like to check the CRL (I use openssl 0.9.7)
I have made an AC
Hi all,
I have one question for you. I want to check extensions added to a CRL
entry but I do not know how to access informations. Actually I use the
code:
rev = X509_CRL_get_REVOKED(crl);
for(i = 0; i sk_X509_REVOKED_num(rev); i++) {
r = sk_X509_REVOKED_value(rev,
OpenSSL version: 0.9.7
Platform: HP-UX 11.00
Severity: Minor
Hello,
I just rebuilt OpenSSL 0.9.7 on several platforms (OpenVMS, Solaris, Linux,
HP-UX, WinNT). The make failed on HP-UX due to a minor problem in the
following four makefiles (all new in 0.9.7 AFAIK):
$(RANLIB) $(LIB) || echo Never mind.
How about putting a leading minus sign; it's simpler.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL
$(RANLIB) $(LIB) || echo Never mind.
How about putting a leading minus sign; it's simpler.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jan 16 18:06:21 2003]:
OpenSSL version: 0.9.7
Platform: HP-UX 11.00
Severity: Minor
Hello,
I just rebuilt OpenSSL 0.9.7 on several platforms (OpenVMS, Solaris,
Linux,
HP-UX, WinNT). The make failed on HP-UX due to a minor problem in
the
following four
Rich Salz via RT wrote :
$(RANLIB) $(LIB) || echo Never mind.
How about putting a leading minus sign; it's simpler.
Sure. My proposal was just to make it consistent with other Makefiles
in OpenSSL sources.
-Thierry
At 06:02 PM 1/15/2003 +0100, you wrote:
If you just can't figure out
Just to clarify. The posted patch is not so to say try-your-luck
thing, it *does* get me through the ms\test.
Understood, but it was unclear if it fixed the bug I posted in the PEM
read, which is very likely a similar
what did you do to get tunala to compile under Win32?
Oh, that. I have been meaning to send Geoff the diff so it could get
merged into the code base. I'll get to it some day. I had to wrap up
sockets a little and make a few mods in ip. Here is a zip of it with the
DSP. Some project
Hello,
The following modifications (or similar) are needed to enable
cryptodev support on FreeBSD (which has imported OpenBSD's
/dev/crypto). FreeBSD's /dev/crypto is available in 5.0-RELEASE and
in 4-STABLE (and the upcoming 4.8-RELEASE).
Cheers,
--
Jacques A. Vidrine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks. The patch is applied and committed.
This ticket is now resolved.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jan 16 19:05:40 2003]:
Hello,
The following modifications (or similar) are needed to enable
cryptodev support on FreeBSD (which has imported OpenBSD's
/dev/crypto). FreeBSD's /dev/crypto
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003, Massimiliano Pala wrote:
Hi all,
I have one question for you. I want to check extensions added to a CRL
entry but I do not know how to access informations. Actually I use the
code:
rev = X509_CRL_get_REVOKED(crl);
for(i = 0; i
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:37:04PM +0100, Massimiliano Pala wrote:
Hi all,
I have one question for you. I want to check extensions added to a CRL
entry but I do not know how to access informations. Actually I use the
code:
rev = X509_CRL_get_REVOKED(crl);
for(i = 0; i
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jan 16 18:39:44 2003]:
what did you do to get tunala to compile under Win32?
Oh, that. I have been meaning to send Geoff the diff so it could get
merged into the code base. I'll get to it some day. I had to wrap up
sockets a little and make a few mods in
* Jacques A. Vidrine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Prepare for a possibly dumb question. :-)
No, it's a good question.
How are existing applications generally supposed to take advantage of
ENGINE? I notice that in crypto/evp/c_all.c, there is an
OpenBSD-specific hook to enable the `cryptodev'
Hi
I apologize for this annoying win32 spam. I have google'd a lot but
still couldn't find the exact reason why a windows 98 with IE 6.0 box
would fail to decrypt a signed and then encrypted pkcs7 message that I
generated using openssl 0.9.6g.
When the message is EVP_des_ede3_cbc() encrypted,
I've searched the archives, don't find a mention of this, and the Jan 15 snapshot has
the same apparent bug. I'm not absolutely sure, and even if I'm right it's a
one-line fix so I'm hoping one of the active members would be willing to patch it.
[[By the way, the webpage form to submit to
Hello,
I just got the latest snapshot (openssl-SNAP-20030116.tar.gz) to update
my local OpenSSL, and it chokes part way through the Win32 build.
I did the `perl Configure VC-WIN32` and `ms\do_ms` to prepare and
`nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak` to try and make.
The errors from nmake are as follows:
cl
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003, Himanshu Soni wrote:
Hi
I apologize for this annoying win32 spam. I have google'd a lot but
still couldn't find the exact reason why a windows 98 with IE 6.0 box
would fail to decrypt a signed and then encrypted pkcs7 message that I
generated using openssl 0.9.6g.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003, Larry West wrote:
I've searched the archives, don't find a mention of this, and the Jan 15 snapshot
has the same apparent bug. I'm not absolutely sure, and even if I'm right it's a
one-line fix so I'm hoping one of the active members would be willing to patch it.
I am running IE 6.0 with cipher strength of 128 bit. Is there an additional
security patch that I need to install even if the About Box says that its
128 bit?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dr. Stephen Henson
Sent: Thursday, January
22 matches
Mail list logo