openssl-0.9.8-beta6 tested ok on Solaris 8 cc (32+64 bit) and gcc 2.95.3 (32 bit)

openssl-0.9.8-beta6 compiled and tested ok on the following combinations: - Solaris 8 SPARC cc: Sun C 5.7 2005/01/07 32-bit (./Configure solaris-sparcv9-cc shared) - Solaris 8 SPARC cc: Sun C 5.7 2005/01/07 64-bit (./Configure solaris64-sparcv9-cc shared) - Solaris 8 SPARC gcc 2.95.3 32-bit

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.8 beta 6 released

On Jun 21 08:21, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OpenSSL version 0.9.8 Beta 6 (FINAL!) Build and tests fine on Cygwin. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Project Co-Leader Red Hat, Inc.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.8 beta 6 released

Beta 6 compiles fine and passes tests on win32 (XP/VC6/nasm) -michael -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Juni 2005 08:22 An: openssl-announce@openssl.org;

[openssl.org #1126] 0.9.8-beta6: make report: Test passed

Hi! If I understood OpenSSL 0.9.8 beta 6 announcement correctly, you wanted to see following info. Perhaps you only wanted to see test failures reported, in that case sorry for disturbing. Best regards, Petri Koistinen OpenSSL self-test report: OpenSSL version: 0.9.8-beta6 Last change:

[openssl.org #1127] openssl-0.9.8-beta6: two minor problem man pages during install

During installation: installing man3/OPENSSL_Applink.3 ../../util/pod2man.pl: Improper man page - no dash in NAME header in paragraph 3 of OPENSSL_Applink.pod .3 = OPENSSL_Applink.3 installing man3/OPENSSL_ia32cap.3 ../../util/pod2man.pl: Improper man page - no dash in NAME header in

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.8 beta 6 released

On Jun 22 10:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jun 21 08:21, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OpenSSL version 0.9.8 Beta 6 (FINAL!) Build and tests fine on Cygwin. Just one installation quirk. The engines are installed non-stripped

RE: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.8 beta 6 released

Hi, I've tested it on the platforms below with no problems. Looking good! Commands executed on Windows (not Cygwin): perl Configure VC-WIN32 ms\do_ms (didn't have MASM/NASM handy) nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak cd out32dll ..\ms\test Commands executed on all

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.8 beta 6 released

On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 11:57:29PM +1000, Steven Reddie wrote: Hi, I've tested it on the platforms below with no problems. Looking good! Commands executed on Windows (not Cygwin): perl Configure VC-WIN32 ms\do_ms (didn't have MASM/NASM handy) nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak

[openssl.org #1126] 0.9.8-beta6: make report: Test passed

Here or on the mailing lists, I don't particularly care. Thanks for testing! [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jun 22 13:25:55 2005]: Hi! If I understood OpenSSL 0.9.8 beta 6 announcement correctly, you wanted to see following info. Perhaps you only wanted to see test failures reported, in that

[openssl.org #1124] Standart ISO 8601 violation(Bug in ASN1_GENERALIZEDTIME_set?)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jun 21 15:24:18 2005]: I am using perl to parse result from openssl's ASN.1 and found following problem: Perl request ASN1_GENERALIZEDTIME to be in format 19940203T141529Z. Openssl functrion ASN1_GENERALIZEDTIME_set does not set T between date and time.

[openssl.org #1124] Standart ISO 8601 violation(Bug in ASN1_GENERALIZEDTIME_set?)

[levitte - Wed Jun 22 16:31:26 2005]: GeneralizeTime is defined in X.680 and ISO/IEC Internal Standard 8824- 1. Read carefully, it specifies that the date part should be formatted as specified in ISO 8601, as well as the time part, but it doesn't say that the combined value should be

RE: [openssl.org #1122] [PATCH] ssl_lib.c compilation fails on Diab Data compiler

Yep, that's the only place. I hate DCC too... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Levitte via RT Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 5:46 PM To: Yair Elharrar Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: [openssl.org #1122] [PATCH] ssl_lib.c

[openssl.org #1121] [patch 0.9.8-beta5] make depend fails if bn_prime.h does not exist

No problem. I gladly defer to your experience and judgement. Thanks for the speedy resolution. PG __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List

Re: [openssl.org #1124] Standart ISO 8601 violation(Bug in ASN1_GENERALIZEDTIME_set?)

Richard Levitte via RT wrote: [levitte - Wed Jun 22 16:31:26 2005]: GeneralizeTime is defined in X.680 and ISO/IEC Internal Standard 8824- 1. Read carefully, it specifies that the date part should be formatted as specified in ISO 8601, as well as the time part, but it doesn't say

[openssl.org #1128] [Fwd: Bug#314465: CA.pl and openssl.cnf default to insecure MD5 digest]

__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

0.9.8-beta6 on DJGPP

I sent the following on 21 June, but I don't see where it actually made it to the list or to the archives. Sorry if it turns out to be a duplicate. The beta6 of openssl 0.9.8 compiles, tests, and installs on DJGPP without any problems that I see. There is just one warning during the compilation,

0.9.8 beta 6 fails to compile on OpenBSD 3.2

[Note: this isn't important for me as OpenBSD comes with OpenSSL, I was just curious whether this would work.] OpenBSD 3.2/x86: $ ./config no-asm Operating system: i386-whatever-openbsd Configuring for BSD-x86 Configuring for BSD-x86 no-asm [option] OPENSSL_NO_ASM no-gmp

Re: 0.9.8 beta 6 fails to compile on OpenBSD 3.2

OpenBSD 3.2/x86: $ ./config no-asm It doesn't disable asm: This is apparently a bug in ./Configure (it's not OpenBSD specific, as it's reproducible everywhere, shall be fixed). dx86-out.s: Assembler messages: dx86-out.s:2376: Error: Unimplemented segment type 135296 in

Re: 0.9.8 beta 6 fails to compile on OpenBSD 3.2

On Wed, Jun 22, 2005, Andy Polyakov wrote: OpenBSD 3.2/x86: $ ./config no-asm It doesn't disable asm: This is apparently a bug in ./Configure (it's not OpenBSD specific, as it's reproducible everywhere, shall be fixed). Thanks! dx86-out.s:2376: Error: Unimplemented segment type

[openssl.org #1129] [PATCH] Update 0.9.8 Configure lines for Stratus VOS

Here are the patches to the OpenSSL 0.9.8-beta5 Configure script for Stratus VOS. I've tested them on a Stratus Continuum (PA-RISC) system running VOS 14.7.0ax and on the Stratus V Series V400 system (Intel IA32) running VOS 15.1.0ah. These changes are sufficient for our PA- RISC platform,

[openssl.org #1130] [PATCH] OpenSSL 0.9.8 general patches for Stratus VOS

These changes, together with the changes to the Configure script found in ticket #1129, constitute the total set of changes needed to get OpenSSL 0.9.8-beta5 to build and run its self-tests on the Stratus V Series (Intel IA32) platform. They are not needed for the Stratus Continuum (PA-RISC)

FTPS support for s_client?

I've done the small amount of work to patch s_client to support explicit AUTH TLS mode for FTPS. Has anyone ever submitted this patch before, or should I go ahead and send it in? Thanks -- Andy Steingruebl | e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Information Security Architect| phone: (312)

[openssl.org #1129] [PATCH] Update 0.9.8 Configure lines for Stratus VOS

I'm breaking up the changes into VOS-only changes (this patch) and a second patch that VOS IA32 needs but which also affects other platforms. The second patch is contained in ticket 1130. __ OpenSSL Project

Patch for 0.9.8beta6 by_dir.c

On April 24th, I wrote to openssl-dev: Also, the function dir_ctrl in crypto/x509/by_dir.c looks wrong to me. Shouldn't it be checking for the environment variable first, then getting the default if no environment variable is specified (the way by_file_ctrl does in crypto/x509/by_file.c)?