Hi,
Maybe haviong a look at OpenSSL web site first:
http://www.openssl.org/source/repos.html
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Denis Andreevich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 10/16/2005 6:10 PM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Cc:
Subject:Please help me to update
Hi,
Please introduce versioned symbols in openssl, so that programs linked
to different libraries which in turn are linked to different versions of
openssl will not break. The transition from version 0.9.7 to 0.9.8
without versioned symbols is really a pain otherwise. I sent a proposal
to [EMAIL
[Additional note to get the proposal itself into this ticket's history]
From: Christoph Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 23:24:58 +0200
Subject: Proposal for symbol versioning of openssl
Hi folks,
openssl has evolved to a very important library in Linux distribution. A
lot of
Hi,
[ Sorry this is slightly outdated (I'm just back from three weeks of
holiday
and really wanted to send it before leaving ...) ]
Is there a reason why openssl-0.9.8 doesn't support building a 64-bit
version with gcc on AIX machines (nor does openssl-0.9.8a, AFAICS)?
The following
Steven Reddie wrote:
Hi Michael,
I'm familiar with that approach, having used it many times myself. The
choice of poll over select isn't important since they're basically the same;
in fact, poll is sometimes implemented with select.
Who implements poll with select should suffer a fate
Hi,
OpenSSL-0.9.8a fails to link for me on OS/2, a simple patch ensuring
the correct
compilation options
(patch)
diff -r -u openssl-0.9.8/util/pl/OS2-EMX.pl
openssl-0.9.8.patched/util/pl/OS2-EMX.pl
--- openssl-0.9.8/util/pl/OS2-EMX.pl2003-11-28
With OpenSSL 0.9.8a:
$ openssl version
OpenSSL 0.9.8a 11 Oct 2005
$ openssl ciphers 'RSA+DSS+AES+3DES+SHA1'
Error in cipher list
15676:error:144020B9:SSL routines:SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list:no cipher
match:ssl_lib.c:1176:
With OpenSSL 0.9.7d:
$ openssl version
Michael Sierchio wrote:
Steven Reddie wrote:
Hi Michael,
I'm familiar with that approach, having used it many times myself. The
choice of poll over select isn't important since they're basically the
same;
in fact, poll is sometimes implemented with select.
Who implements poll with
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 02:43:19PM -0700, Lev Walkin wrote:
Michael Sierchio wrote:
Steven Reddie wrote:
Hi Michael,
I'm familiar with that approach, having used it many times myself. The
choice of poll over select isn't important since they're basically the
same;
in fact, poll is
Jack Lloyd wrote:
I believe Michael is actually talking about the thundering herd problem, when
many processes are all waiting on a single event, which only one of them will
end up responding to. That is a classic problem affecting some uses of select
(and also accept, and IIRC a few other
Michael Sierchio wrote:
Jack Lloyd wrote:
I believe Michael is actually talking about the thundering herd
problem, when
many processes are all waiting on a single event, which only one of
them will
end up responding to. That is a classic problem affecting some uses of
select
(and also
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005, nagendra modadugu wrote:
With OpenSSL 0.9.8a:
$ openssl version
OpenSSL 0.9.8a 11 Oct 2005
$ openssl ciphers 'RSA+DSS+AES+3DES+SHA1'
Error in cipher list
15676:error:144020B9:SSL routines:SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list:no cipher
Lev Walkin wrote:
... Poll() provides no advantage over select()
for the thundering herd problem.
Sorry, I'm not here to chew your food for you.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Jack Lloyd wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 02:43:19PM -0700, Lev Walkin wrote:
Michael Sierchio wrote:
[skip]
Who implements poll with select should suffer a fate worse than
death -- waking up a thousand sleeping threads to see if one
has some i/o ready is what poll was designed to avoid.
Lev Walkin wrote:
Including poll().
A polling model may be built on /dev/poll or kernel queues, etc.
I made mention of /dev/poll in my first contribution to this
thread. Go back to class.
__
OpenSSL Project
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard Levitte - VMS
Whacker via RT
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 5:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #1222] Please introduce versioned symbols
[Additional
16 matches
Mail list logo