Stacy Johnson (stacjohn) wrote:
Are there any known issues when using the Apache HttpClient to send
https requests to Tomcat running with tcnative-1.dll? Perhaps different
SSL stacks causing issues?
Nope, it was an bug in tcnative.
See: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=605571view=rev
The
OpenSSL 0.9.8g SSLv3 only client (with tlsext support compiled in) is
broken when communicating with some servers.
Example:
openssl s_client -ssl3 -connect irc.mozilla.org:6697 -debug
CONNECTED(0003)
write to 0x67f3c0 [0x6891b0] (111 bytes = 111 (0x6F))
- 16 03 00 00 6a 01 00 00-66 03 00
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Lutz,
Replies to active tickets are handled automatically.
I've a ticket open where I posted a couple of times updates:
http://rt.openssl.org/index.html?q=1611
but nothing of these appear here on the list - although they are properly
listed with #1611...
can
Hi list,
please have a look here:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=docs/118902
Comments?
Please CC me, since I'm not on the list.
Regards,
--
Pietro Cerutti
PGP Public Key:
http://gahr.ch/pgp
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
openssl-SNAP-20080105.tar.gz
For Linux there's a 7za source and binary commandline available from here:
http://p7zip.sourceforge.net/
The Win32 GUI and commandline version is available from here:
http://www.7-zip.org/
I dont want to propose here to just replace tar.gz with 7z,
but I think it would
:27 openssl-SNAP-20080105.tar.gz
I'm not sure if the popularity of 7-Zip is high enough to justify the
effort. But the benefit is significant. I ran some tests of an OpenSSL build
using default settings for all compressors. It looked like this (higher is
better):
Tar: 1.0 (reference)
Tar
-20080105.7z
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3781438 Jan 5 17:27 openssl-SNAP-20080105.tar.gz
I'm not sure if the popularity of 7-Zip is high enough to justify the
effort. But the benefit is significant. I ran some tests of an OpenSSL
build using default settings for all compressors. It looked like
looks to me like tar+lzma is the way to go, not 7z
In my quick test, lzma got a 7.6, beating 7z by a negligible margin.
I think it largely comes down to whether any of these are popular enough to
justify the effort of offering in that format. We've been down this road
before in the transition
On Sunday 06 January 2008, David Schwartz wrote:
looks to me like tar+lzma is the way to go, not 7z
In my quick test, lzma got a 7.6, beating 7z by a negligible margin.
I think it largely comes down to whether any of these are popular enough to
justify the effort of offering in that format.
