From: "Arpadffy Zoltan" <zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se>
> This patch corrects build on OpenVMS systems. I haven't looked at it yet, but ... > As VMS does not have a make clean function yet, it was hard to separate > the really modified files from the copied (poor symlink imitation on > VMS) etc. Copied files? What's copied? I thought that I had eliminated all the file copying (and the need for any symlinks). > TODO: > [...] > - test with other compilers than DECC Who uses anything else? > OPTIONAL TODO > - in order to make life more compatible we could use the same logicals > like HP's SSL product - I mean SSL$ROOT instead of SSLROOT I changed the library names from xxx to SSL_xxx to look more like HP's SSL$xxx (and so I could find them), but I don't see a good reason to go further than that. I believe that many people and procedures use these SSL* logical names to determine which SSL package is being used. Making everything look exactly the same would seem likely to cause more trouble than leaving them different. If there _is_ a good reason to make a change like this, please explain why, how, and so on, and why it wouldn't break a lot of existing stuff. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street (+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547 ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
