RE: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-10-28 Thread Arpadffy Zoltan
Hello, It has passed few months and it is getting closer to the official release of v1.0.0. I have recently checked out the source from the CVS and tested the VMS build and in order to finalize issues from my TODO lis: - add support for building 32 and 64 bits libraries - testca and testtsa

Re: ECDSA_do_verify()

2009-10-28 Thread Kirk81
yep, thanks!! you were right! I had a shock about the performance: I didn't aspect it soo fast!! That was my doubt. Here my MSVC 2008 build binary against 'openssl-1.0.0-stable-SNAP-20091028'. http://www.nabble.com/file/p26093729/ECDSA.exe ECDSA.exe Thanks for the hint about the loop

[openssl.org #2085] [patch] invert util/domd check to work with multiple compilers

2009-10-28 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
[vap...@gentoo.org - Mon Oct 26 13:59:37 2009]: the current util/domd script defaults $MAKEDEPEND to `makedepend` and then checks the value against gcc. this doesnt work if $MAKEDEPEND is set to a gcc compiler by another name (i686-pc-linux-gcc, cc, etc...). so invert the script logic

Re: ECDSA_do_verify()

2009-10-28 Thread Kirk81
Sorry guys, I found some mistakes in my code. This is about the benchmark of the function: previously when I print out the values of the numbers of CPUticks and 'WinTime', I'm considering the sign (or the verify) operation for a loop of 100 repeated times. So finally, with an IA-32 Pentium M

Re: EVP_SignFinal dramatically slow

2009-10-28 Thread Kirk81
armstrong wrote: Hi Is someone here can help me? I am using EVP Public Key Interface to sign and verify some digital signatures. And i find the call to EVP_SignFinal is very slow. In the test, RSA1024-SHA1 was used, the call to EVP_SignFinal consuming almost 0.19~0.2 second.

Regarding OpenSSL not working for nCipher hardware engine support

2009-10-28 Thread Sandeep Singh
Hi, I have tried all the possibilities of configuring OpenSSL version: openssl-0.9.8k for (chil) nCipher hardware engine support and I was not able to get it working. I have performed the following steps: 1: Installed the openssl-0.9.8k on Linux: CentOS release 5.4 (Final) 2: Then I adjusted

Re: ECDSA_do_verify()

2009-10-28 Thread Michael Sierchio
Kirk81 wrote: Sorry guys, I found some mistakes in my code. Not just in your code So finally, with an IA-32 Pentium M processor 1500MHz, the functions are in order of microseconds [ms]: ms denotes milliseconds. us denotes microseconds, unless you can express it as μs, which is obviously

Re: ECDSA_do_verify()

2009-10-28 Thread Kirk81
u r right. I think one things and i wrote another :-/ I'm in the order on milliseconds [ms]. Michael Sierchio wrote: Kirk81 wrote: Sorry guys, I found some mistakes in my code. Not just in your code So finally, with an IA-32 Pentium M processor 1500MHz, the functions are in

Re: [openssl.org #2085] [patch] invert util/domd check to work with multiple compilers

2009-10-28 Thread Mike Frysinger via RT
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 10:18:10 Stephen Henson via RT wrote: [vap...@gentoo.org - Mon Oct 26 13:59:37 2009]: the current util/domd script defaults $MAKEDEPEND to `makedepend` and then checks the value against gcc. this doesnt work if $MAKEDEPEND is set to a gcc compiler by

Re: ECDSA_do_verify()

2009-10-28 Thread Mounir IDRASSI
-1.0.0-stable-SNAP-20091028'. http://www.nabble.com/file/p26093729/ECDSA.exe ECDSA.exe Thanks for the hint about the loop of measurements: it was in program in the following version. And thank you very much about the overflow: I didn't notice that. Seem you're quite familiary with openSSL