Is BIO_free(second_bio) needed when using BIO_new_bio_pair()?

Hi, the ocumentation about BIO_new_bio_pair seems confusing. The doc at https://www.openssl.org/docs/crypto/BIO_s_bio.html clearly says: Both halves of a BIO pair should be freed. That is even if one half is implicit freed due to a BIO_free_all() or SSL_free() call

[openssl.org #3456] PATCH: fix typo in pem.pod

Applied, thanks for the report. Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org __ OpenSSL Project

Re: [openssl.org #3455] Compile error on Tandem NonStop (including patch)

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:31:36PM +0200, Johnson, Wayne via RT wrote: c89 -DMONOLITH -I.. -I../include -Ww -D__TANDEM -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED=1 -D_TANDEM_SOURCE -DB_ENDIAN -c -o ca.o ca.c #include sys/file.h ^

RE: openssl apps; flags, parsing dates, etc.

The right thing to do is change opt_format to be generic, and specify exactly which types of formats are supported. Done and pushed. Some of the bit-settings are probably more loose than I'd like, but it works. /r$ -- Principal Security Engineer Akamai Technologies, Cambridge, MA