Am 10.02.2015 um 21:30 schrieb Matt Caswell:
On 10/02/15 19:23, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hello everyone,
I sent a mail to r...@openssl.org 3 days ago, subject OpenSSL 1.0.2 make
test bus error in evp_test (Solaris 10 Sparc, sun4u).
The mail didn't create a new ticket in RT, nor was it forwarded to
Thanks for looking into this, and thanks for providing a reproducer.
I just tried with the current git HEAD from 2015-02-23 (1.1.0) and was
able to reproduce the bug with PostgreSQL.
I just saw that there is bug #2481 which is probably the same problem.
This bug was created in 2011 and is still
I have created pull requests on Github for HEAD and 1.0.2:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/228 (master)
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/229 (OpenSSL_1_0_2-stable)
These contain the fixes I have already filed in RT#3703, RT#3704 and
RT#3711.
For master, it also introduces
2nd attempt. First sent on Feb 7th.
I get a failure for 1.0.2 running make test on Solaris 10.
It might be related to #3688, but I don't think so.
Mine is a sun4u machine, so neither T2 nor T4.
Compilation done with gcc 4.9.1 with v9 target.
Failure is a bus error in evp_test.
gdb shows the
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:53:17AM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 10.02.2015 um 21:30 schrieb Matt Caswell:
On 10/02/15 19:23, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hello everyone,
I sent a mail to r...@openssl.org 3 days ago, subject OpenSSL 1.0.2 make
test bus error in evp_test (Solaris 10 Sparc, sun4u).
Thanks Rainer.
Closing this as a gcc bug.
Matt
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Details
==
Fips 2.0.5 configured with no-asm and threads.
Openssl 1.0.1H configured with shared, fips, threads no-asm (many alogos
omitted)
compiler - using aCC 6.25 on HPUX-IA64 11.23.
bash-2.05$ aCC --version
aCC: HP C/aC++ B3910B A.06.25.02 [Nov 25 2010]
bash-2.05$
product linking with
Hi,
Are you aware of the file system redirector on Windows for running 32
bit applications on a 64 bit OS ?
The issue could be that you're testing two completely different
binaries, one 32 bit and one 64 bit, hence the different result. Try to
test text-only files.
Please see
Hi,
Are you aware of the file system redirector on Windows for running 32
bit applications on a 64 bit OS ?
The issue could be that you're testing two completely different
binaries, one 32 bit and one 64 bit, hence the different result. Try to
test text-only files.
Please see
