Any thoughts/pointers?
Including openssl-users group in hope if any one aware of this issue.
--
BR
,
Atul Thosar
On 29 February 2016 at 00:15, Atul Thosar wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am building OpenSSL v1.0.2f for Win32 platform, but compilation failed
> w/ following errors.
Hi:
we met crash of openssl (varely, 3 times i have seen) on linux x86_64.
openSSL version is 1.0.1r.
The stack is as below:
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f0654871700 (LWP 22383)):
#0 0x7f06a2cdddb8 in sha1_block_data_order_ssse3 ()
from
Roumen, you're right. Does the leak go away when the cleanup_all_ex_data is
called?
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2363
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe:
Roumen, you're right. Does the leak go away when the cleanup_all_ex_data is
called?
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
It is expected DH_free(DH_new()); to leaks memory. Usually XXX method
initialize "extra data".
Sample code is without code that clear library, at least
CRYPTO_cleanup_all_ex_data is missing.
Roumen
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2363
Please log in as guest
>From discussion in GH 664 with Rob Percival. The issue of repeatd macros came
>up.
Thanks. I've just looked at merging all of the various definitions of those
macros and it's not pretty - not all of the definitions match. There's a bug in
some of the definitions in ssl_locl.h ('c' is not
Hi Viktor,
With your patch applied, I can confirm that the 'req' command now run just
fine.
Thanks,
Michel.
-Message d'origine-
De : openssl-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] De la part de
Viktor Dukhovni
Envoyé : lundi 29 février 2016 19:00
À : openssl-dev@openssl.org
This is automatically generated email about markup problems in a man
page for which you appear to be responsible. If you are not the right
person or list, please tell me so I can correct my database.
See http://catb.org/~esr/doclifter/bugs.html for details on how and
why these patches were
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 03:51:02PM +0100, Michel wrote:
> They are failing when calling the 'req' command with a configure script
> containing input_password/output password :
Please try the patch below:
--
Viktor.
diff --git a/apps/req.c b/apps/req.c
index 693acc2..b128fa8 100644
---
Hi,
I have some tests scripts that were working well with 1.0.2 and are crashing
using v1.1 (Windows 7).
They are failing when calling the 'req' command with a configure script
containing input_password/output password :
openssl req -new -batch -key RootCA.key -out RootCA.csr -config
Didn't see any co-factor ECDH tests, so here's a PR:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/763
KATs parsed from here:
http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cavp/documents/components/ecccdhtestvectors.zip
BBB
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4357
Please log in as
On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 12:40 -0800, Sander Temme wrote:
> However, I’m intrigued by the notion of a PKCS#11 Engine in OpenSSL:
> it’s a standard (an OASIS standard now); it’s fairly fully featured;
> everyone in the industry supports it including Thales; and you can
> build a program that calls it
On 24/02/16 16:48, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> Matt Caswell wrote:
>
>> The complete patch is attached. This is currently going through review,
>> and solves the link issue.
>
> That brought MSVC-2015 back on track. Thanks!
>
This has now been committed, so hopefully this should work again now.
13 matches
Mail list logo