[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4549] powerpc test problem: missing symbols

Applied and merged into master. Thank you. Closing this ticket. Cheers, Richard On Wed Jun 01 22:31:14 2016, sebast...@breakpoint.cc wrote: > On 2016-05-30 21:28:06 [+], Andy Polyakov via RT wrote: > > For what it's worth I can't reproduce problem on Fedora or RedHat. > > The test > |… > |#

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4553] Re: Fedora 1, i386: error: field `next_timeout` has incomplete type

On Wed Jun 01 22:45:08 2016, noloa...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Richard Levitte via RT > wrote: > > Please give us the full configuration command you used, including > > environment > > variables that may affect it. Just the presence of '-ansi' tells me

Re: [openssl-dev] [OpenSSL][1.0.2h] Memory leaks

Works for me with mingw 32-bit: ALL OCSP TESTS SUCCESSFUL Test X509v3_check_* ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./v3nametest ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./heartbeat_test Test constant time utilites ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./constant_time_test Testing constant time operations... ok (ran 1908 tests) test_verify_extra

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4553] Re: Fedora 1, i386: error: field `next_timeout` has incomplete type

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > Please give us the full configuration command you used, including environment > variables that may affect it. Just the presence of '-ansi' tells me that you > didn't just say './config' without any arguments. I

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4549] powerpc test problem: missing symbols

On 2016-05-30 21:28:06 [+], Andy Polyakov via RT wrote: > For what it's worth I can't reproduce problem on Fedora or RedHat. The test |… |# The following symbols are missing in libcrypto.so: |# _shadow_DES_check_key |not ok 2 - check that there are no missing symbols in libcrypto.so |… So

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4553] Re: Fedora 1, i386: error: field `next_timeout` has incomplete type

Does it make a difference if you add 'no-sse2' to your configuration command? On Wed Jun 01 21:22:24 2016, noloa...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Richard Levitte via RT > wrote: > > Please give us the full configuration command you used, including > >

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4434] Gentoo 13, x86_64: 4 failed self tests

Hi Jeff Please could you try the attached patch? Thanks Matt -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4434 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted >From 199bf71fb68a26a9d7ff52af7233bd0b52d0f824 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Caswell

Re: [openssl-dev] [OpenSSL][1.0.2h] Memory leaks

> How did you configure/build? What versions of mingw/msys did you use? ./configure mingw --prefix=/mingw make depend make all make test MSYS 1.0.18(0.48/3/2) 2012-11-21 22:34 i686 unknown; targ=MINGW32 GCC 6.1.0 32-bit Memory leaks didn't occur with previous OpenSSL versions using the same

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4553] Re: Fedora 1, i386: error: field `next_timeout` has incomplete type

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > Please give us the full configuration command you used, including environment > variables that may affect it. Just the presence of '-ansi' tells me that you > didn't just say './config' without any arguments. Sorry

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4553] Re: Fedora 1, i386: error: field `next_timeout` has incomplete type

Please give us the full configuration command you used, including environment variables that may affect it. Just the presence of '-ansi' tells me that you didn't just say './config' without any arguments. On Wed Jun 01 19:54:51 2016, noloa...@gmail.com wrote: > So testing with 1.1.0-pre6 from 1

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4434] Gentoo 13, x86_64: 4 failed self tests

Please try this and send us the result: make test TESTS=test_afalg VERBOSE=1 On Wed Jun 01 19:15:47 2016, noloa...@gmail.com wrote: > It looks like there's still some problems with our old friend afalgtest. > > Below is from 1.1.0-pre6 on 1 JUN 2016 > > ** > > $ cat gentoo-result.txt > (

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4553] Re: Fedora 1, i386: error: field `next_timeout` has incomplete type

So testing with 1.1.0-pre6 from 1 JUN 2016 appears to show some new issues. ./config detects as i686-linux-whatever. However, there are some issues with CFLAGS. The '-arch x86_64' makes it appear to be configured for quasi-OS X mode. I believe -m32 should be used if an arch is needed. There's

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4434] AutoReply: Gentoo 13, x86_64: 4 failed self tests

It looks like there's still some problems with our old friend afalgtest. Below is from 1.1.0-pre6 on 1 JUN 2016 ** $ cat gentoo-result.txt ( cd test; \ SRCTOP=../. \ BLDTOP=../. \ PERL="/usr/bin/perl" \ EXE_EXT= \ OPENSSL_ENGINES=.././engines \ /usr/bin/perl

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4196] BeagleBone Black detected as ARMv4

As you requested :) Closing. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4196 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4196] BeagleBone Black detected as ARMv4

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote: >> This seems like an odd result considering the BeagleBone Black >> processor is closer to a NEON. > > Well, ./config script should add -march=armv7-a option and that is more > than enough to make it NEON-capable. In

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4548] s390x build problem

On 2016-05-30 20:23:35 [+], Andy Polyakov via RT wrote: > > I'm getting: > > crypto/chacha/chacha-s390x.S: Assembler messages: > > crypto/chacha/chacha-s390x.S:7: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `clgije' > > > > > > A full build log is available on: > >

Re: [openssl-dev] [OpenSSL][1.0.2h] Memory leaks

I tried to reproduce this last night, on the following platforms: linux x86_64 fips windows win64a fips windows mingw64 fips make test succeeded with no errors on the first two platforms. For windows/mingw64, though, I did get a different error: test SSL protocol test ssl3 is forbidden in

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #2877] openssl rand does not check write(2) return code

Fixed in master with commit 0f91e1d. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2877 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #2630] Segmentation-fault in ssleay_rand_bytes() after generating a large (INT_MAX) random buffer

Fixed in master (1.1) with commit 0f91e1d -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2630 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4337] SEGV Fault in the DES_fcrypt

Fixed in commit 6493e48. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4337 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4458] "implicitly declared function" warnings due to missing include

This has been fixed in commit 7233bea263 Closing this ticket. Cheers, Richard On Wed May 25 21:46:01 2016, levitte wrote: > I don't get such warnings. Can you tell me what system and with what > tool chain > (including versions)? > > On Sun Mar 20 13:07:43 2016, noloa...@gmail.com wrote: > >

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4388] [PATCH] Don't be sensitive to the order of ALPN and NPN.

Fixed in a different way by commit 0351baae36afe1182237e0bd88ec9d13f5c97f32 -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4388 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl-dev] Null Ciphers in FIPS mode

FIPS does not allow NULL ciphers, so no. -- Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz From: Mody, Darshan (Darshan) [mailto:darshanm...@avaya.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 11:54 PM To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: [openssl-dev] Null Ciphers in FIPS

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4244] dhparam -check should

dhparam will never generate parameters that fail DH_check(). It would be an internal error if it did. I added a sanity check anyway and also brought the documentation up to date. Commit eeb21772e. Closing this ticket. Matt -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4244

Re: [openssl-dev] DTLS retransmission api

On 01/06/16 11:15, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote: > hi, > > we are using DTLS from OpenSSL to implement DTLS-SRTP in our > product (Wire.com) .. The code and implementation works really well > and is very robust. We are using OpenSSL version 1.0.2g > > > since our product is deployed globally on

[openssl-dev] DTLS retransmission api

hi, we are using DTLS from OpenSSL to implement DTLS-SRTP in our product (Wire.com) .. The code and implementation works really well and is very robust. We are using OpenSSL version 1.0.2g since our product is deployed globally on mobile data networks, we have quite variable latency and

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4379] "arch/async_posix.h:67:24: error: ucontext.h: No such file or directory" under OpenBSD 5.7/64-bit

On Wed Jun 01 09:17:18 2016, noloa...@gmail.com wrote: > > Please could you try the attached patch? > > It tested OK. 'make test' executed without any problems. Ship it and > close the ticket. Pushed in commit e51329d38. Closing ticket. Thanks Matt -- Ticket here:

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4379] "arch/async_posix.h:67:24: error: ucontext.h: No such file or directory" under OpenBSD 5.7/64-bit

> Please could you try the attached patch? It tested OK. 'make test' executed without any problems. Ship it and close the ticket. Jeff On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Matt Caswell via RT wrote: > On Sat Mar 05 02:22:00 2016, noloa...@gmail.com wrote: >> cc -I.. -I../..

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4379] "arch/async_posix.h:67:24: error: ucontext.h: No such file or directory" under OpenBSD 5.7/64-bit

Hi Matt, I'm testing this now. Jeff On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Matt Caswell via RT wrote: > On Wed May 11 10:24:31 2016, matt wrote: >> Hi Jeff >> >> Please could you try the attached patch? > > Hi Jeff > > Were you able to try out the patch? > > Thanks > > Matt > > --