[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3198] [PATCH] Fix missing NULL pointer checks and memory leaks in crypto/asn1 files

The last patches from this have now been applied so closing this ticket. Thanks! Matt -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3198 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe:

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3580] [PATCH] Print correct help message (according to configure)

time has passed... nobody looked at this, sorry. fixed earlier by disabling those protocol versions :) -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3580 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe:

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4559] bug: CRYPTO_set_mem_functions() Doesn't Work in Version 1.0.1b

On 6/3/16, 13:23 , "openssl-dev on behalf of Dan Kegel via RT" wrote: >1.02 then. (0.9.8 is fine. I'm ok with 1.0.0/1.0.1 remaining broken.) I compiled your death program, and confirm that it does abort on 1.0.2h. So presumably no

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4559] bug: CRYPTO_set_mem_functions() Doesn't Work in Version 1.0.1b

1.02 then. (0.9.8 is fine. I'm ok with 1.0.0/1.0.1 remaining broken.) On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Rich Salz via RT wrote: > Sorry, but 0.9.8 and 1.0.0 are end of life and getting no updates and 1.0.1 is > only getting security fixes at this time. > > -- > Ticket here:

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4559] bug: CRYPTO_set_mem_functions() Doesn't Work in Version 1.0.1b

Sorry, but 0.9.8 and 1.0.0 are end of life and getting no updates and 1.0.1 is only getting security fixes at this time. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4559 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe:

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4559] bug: CRYPTO_set_mem_functions() Doesn't Work in Version 1.0.1b

The commit From: "Dr. Stephen Henson" Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 15:46:03 + Subject: [PATCH] Add additional OPENSSL_init() handling add dummy call to (hopefully) ensure OPENSSL_init() is always linked into an application.

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4135] Fix for a multi-threading issue in policy cache creation

Commit 7d6df9e in master. Thanks! -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4135 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

[openssl-dev] Inconsistency between implementation and docs in openssl cms

Manual page for “openssl cms” says: If the -decrypt option is used without a recipient certificate then an attempt is made to locate the recipient by trying each potential recipient in turn using the supplied private key. To thwart the MMA attack

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4557] Nit: temporary files left over after [master:8d054a5] installation process

Thank you! Found the tests that generated this and made sure the temporary files get removed. Please get a fresh checkout of the master branch and check again. Closing this ticket. Cheers, Richard On Thu Jun 02 15:50:32 2016, stef...@sdaoden.eu wrote: > Yep: > > -rw--- 1 steffen steffen

Re: [openssl-dev] DTLS retransmission api

On 03/06/16 12:19, Matt Caswell wrote: On 03/06/16 10:52, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote: Hi Matt, thanks for the suggested API and code. Please find below a suggested patch that implements this new callback. the patch is based on 1.0.2-dev from GIT: url:

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4393] [PATCH] Call EC_GROUP_order_bits in priv2opt.

Merge RT4241 here as these are best handled together. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4393 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl-dev] DTLS retransmission api

On 03/06/16 10:52, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote: > Hi Matt, > > thanks for the suggested API and code. Please find below a suggested > patch that implements this new callback. > > > the patch is based on 1.0.2-dev from GIT: > > url: git://git.openssl.org/openssl.git > branch:

Re: [openssl-dev] DTLS retransmission api

On 02/06/16 16:03, Matt Caswell wrote: On 02/06/16 14:33, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote: On 01/06/16 13:58, Matt Caswell wrote: On 01/06/16 11:15, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote: hi, we are using DTLS from OpenSSL to implement DTLS-SRTP in our product (Wire.com) .. The code and implementation

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4512] ChaCha20_ctr32 function increments 64 bit counter?

Hi, > I'm aware it doesn't affect anything because the caller shouldn't process > more than 2^32 * 64 bytes per key/nonce setup anyway. > > I was just wondering because it differs from the s390 asm implementation > (and whether there is a particular reason to do so). Implementation is