On 8 November 2014 17:56, Andy Polyakov ap...@openssl.org wrote:
arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../modes -I../asn1 -I../evp
-I../../include -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN
-DHAVE_DLFCN_H -D__ARM_MAX_ARCH__=8 -DTERMIO -O3 -Wall
-DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m
On 10 November 2014 17:12, Andy Polyakov ap...@openssl.org wrote:
Attached is promised patch that reworks
interworking logic. As mentioned earlier idea is to use __ARM_ARCH__=5
|| !defined(__thumb__). Rationale is that load to pc does interworking
since ARMv5, but without __thumb__ it does
On 3 November 2014 18:36, Andy Polyakov ap...@openssl.org wrote:
Anyway. As nobody seems to be objecting, it sounds like we are going for
combination of both alternatives? I.e. those who specify specific -march
lower than armv7 would be excused from capability detection and run-time
switch,
On 31 October 2014 18:12, Andy Polyakov ap...@openssl.org wrote:
Anyway. As nobody seems to be objecting, it sounds like we are going for
combination of both alternatives? I.e. those who specify specific -march
lower than armv7 would be excused from capability detection and run-time
switch,
On 27 October 2014 21:42, Andy Polyakov ap...@openssl.org wrote:
OK, that sounds doable. But if -Wa is going to be used as a matter of
course to pass arch/fpu options, we should get rid of all #ifdef's
against things like __thumb2__, as they can be out of sync.
First of all users would have
On 26 October 2014 22:43, Andy Polyakov ap...@openssl.org wrote:
Hi,
There is inconsistency in ARM support and I'd like to gather some
opinions on how to resolve it. Circulate this to ARM people near you.
At some point an inconsistency of following nature was introduced and
then just grew.
On 27 October 2014 15:11, Andy Polyakov ap...@openssl.org wrote:
I want to remind that question is *not* about removing run-time switch
as concept, but rather about distinguishing pre-ARMv7 and ARMv=7. I.e.
NEON/cryto switch will stay, the only question if it's worth imposing it
on pre-ARMv7
On 24 October 2014 19:17, Andy Polyakov ap...@openssl.org wrote:
There is inconsistency in ARM support and I'd like to gather some
opinions on how to resolve it. Circulate this to ARM people near you.
At some point an inconsistency of following nature was introduced and
then just grew.
