Re: suspicious VxWorks patch

2003-09-29 Thread Bob Bradley
On 9/29/03 7:29 AM, Gisle Vanem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #define ioctlsocket(a,b,c) ioctl((a),(b),*(int*)(c)) Can this really be right? I mean using it in BIO_socket_ioctl() expands to: ioctlsocket (fd, type, *(int*)ptr); I would assume VxWorks to expect a pointer in the 3rd arg to

[PATCH] VxWorks for MIPS, etc.

2003-09-28 Thread Bob Bradley
The attached patch includes VxWorks improvements (MIPS support and other additions) detailed below. The patch was diff'd against openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030928.tar.gz, which I thought was the same as the OpenSSL_0_9_7-stable branch (at the time). Added support for building OpenSSL for VxWorks

[PATCH] VxWorks PowerPC 860 and no-md2

2003-09-27 Thread Bob Bradley
The attached patch adds Configure script support for VxWorks for PowerPC 860, fixes a compile problem with VxWorks builds, and fixes build problems with no-md2. diff -ur openssl-orig/Configure openssl-work/Configure --- openssl-orig/Configure 2003-04-09 22:46:55.0 -0700 +++