, and it is possible
it is due to these limitations.
In any case, I guess comunity will be grateful if your share your expirience.
WBR,
Andrey
On 5 December 2011 14:33, Deng Michael via RT r...@openssl.org wrote:
Hi,
I have changed the mac code which gives substantial improvement for both
read
, the smaller the record the larger the
percentage of saving since the saving is fixed.
- Original Message -
From: Deng Michael mdeng...@yahoo.com
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org openssl-dev@openssl.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2011 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2650] major ssl read
allocation and deallocation routines in my setup are not very good.
in system with no OS I think the timing is more indicative of software
efficiency. for my setup the unknown is the memory arena malloc / free calls.
- Original Message -
From: Deng Michael mdeng...@yahoo.com
To: openssl
Hi,
I have changed the mac code which gives substantial improvement for both read
and write (not handshake)
The saving is fairly major, on cpu with cryto acceleration, the change
can more than double the overall ssl read /write speed for 1K record
excluding OS IO time. this implies the
Hi,
I have changed the mac code which gives substantial improvement for both read
and write (not handshake)
The saving is fairly major, on cpu with cryto acceleration, the change
can more than double the overall ssl read /write speed for 1K record
excluding OS IO time. this implies the
Well Here s_client will crash with segfault... But if you'll
connect via browser - s_server will crash.
Please let me know if you'll have any questions.
Andrey.
On 30 November 2011 05:56, Deng Michael mdeng...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Steve for the comment.
I guess there are other ways
-connect 192.168.10.103:443 -msg
Well Here s_client will crash with segfault... But if you'll
connect via browser - s_server will crash.
Please let me know if you'll have any questions.
Andrey.
On 30 November 2011 05:56, Deng Michael mdeng...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Steve for the comment.
I
Henson st...@openssl.org
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: major ssl read/ write performance improvement
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011, Deng Michael wrote:
Hi,
I have changed the mac code which gives substantial improvement for both read
and write
Hi,
I have changed the mac code which gives substantial improvement for both read
and write (not handshake)
The saving is fairly major, on cpu with cryto acceleration, the change can more
than double the overall ssl read /write speed for 1K record excluding OS IO
time. this implies the change
