of zBIO showed there) and it works, so may be it
would work one step more with sockets BIOs.
- Original Message -
From: Le Saux, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:24 PM
Subject: RE: OpenSSL and compression using ZLIB
Again I want to clarify
Arts
-Original Message-
From: Howard Chu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OpenSSL and compression using ZLIB
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Le Saux, Eric
In the current implementation of OpenSSL, compression/decompression state is
initialized and destroyed per record. It cannot possibly interoperate with
a compressor that maintains compression state across records. The
decompressor does care, unfortunately. The other way around could work,
in the OpenSSL use of
compression. Is it an architectural constraint?
Eric Le Saux
Electronic Arts
-Original Message-
From: Bear Giles [mailto:bgiles;coyotesong.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OpenSSL and compression using ZLIB
Le Saux, Eric
-
From: David Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November
12, 2002 4:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Le Saux, Eric
Subject: RE: OpenSSL and compression using ZLIB
On Tue, 12 Nov
2002 18:09:13 -0600, Le
Saux, Eric wrote:
I believe Gregory Stark meant RFC2246
OpenSSL (0.9.6g) has
support for compression, both using RLE and ZLIB.
The way ZLIB is used, calls to the compress()
function are made on each block of data transmitted.
Compress() is a
higher-level function that calls deflateInit(),
deflate() and deflateEnd().
I am trying to
