Also I see the algorithm DESCBC - a block cipher. So padding is also involved
for blocks not multiples of 8 characters.
Do you account for this? I didn't check if you do. Possibly use a stream cipher
mode with an IV.
paul
-Original Message-
From:
Hi,
Try Eric Rescorla's SSL and TLS book - the appendix has some Java code.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 11:54 AM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re:
If encryption buffer size is not a multiple of the block size (in AES
that's always 16 bytes)...
Have you tried other modes? For the stream cipher modes, CFB and OFB,
this statement is not true. It should only encrypt the number of
characters (or bits) of plain text presented.
Hi,
RFC 3686 is specific to IPSEC and using AES-CTR as the algorithm for
their encapsulated security payload. To me, the RFC indicates a 32 bit
counter (when all they really need is 28 bits) to handle the IPV6
jumbogram.
From the RFC 3686:
.
.
.
Block Counter
The block counter field
Hi,
Can you use the OPENSSL S_SERVER or S_CLIENT commands, depending on which part of your
program you want to use or see, and using -debug -msg -state parameters with these
client or server programs, see the data you are looking for in the protocol exchange?
The flush... Depends on processing
Hi,
I just tripped across this same problem yesterday. Which modules is it?
I'd like to fix this for OpenVMS.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dalini
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 7:17 PM
To:
.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ives Steglich
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 9:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: openssl 0.9.7d as an security risk
Mosteika, Paul Edward (OpenVMS Engineering) wrote:
Hi,
I just
Title: Message
Hi,
Goto the Sources http://www.openssl.org/source/,
pull down the kit, expand it and look at :
INSTALL.W32
Paul
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Liying AiSent: Friday, October 15, 2004 4:36
PMTo:
