Perhaps I am biased a bit!, but if there are no objections maybe the
patch should be considered by those with permissions for merging to master?
On 13/08/2014 09:31 μμ, Vyronas Tsingaras wrote:
Your proposed transition strategy sounds good. Maybe as a first step OpenSSL
could tolerate a leading
Hey John et al,
If you could also take a look at https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/111
we have listed a number of reasons. What are your thoughts on this?
Regards,
Vyronas Tsingaras
On 13/08/2014 11:57 πμ, John Denker wrote:
Hi Folks --
0) Beware that I am not an expert in this area
] On
Behalf Of John Denker
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 7:59 PM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: nameConstraints : leading . in permission list items
On 08/13/2014 03:46 AM, Vyronas Tsingaras wrote:
If you could also take a look at
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/111
we have
