[ please include the CC:, I do not read [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Does your md4 patch have been tested on 64 bits processors ?
Yes, and it works fine.
/assar
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Hi,
Evan Carew wrote re: MD4:
Because if it is bundled into a standard package such as this you can
ship source or executable code designed to link to it that will do
things like crack open NT boxes that still use it. Recently, while at
a major bank in the US Midwest, I had occasion to
From: Lewis McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lewis.mccarthy It sounds like you're talking about using MD4 as part
lewis.mccarthy of something else, not as part of SSL or TLS. I see
lewis.mccarthy OpenSSL as an SSL/TLS library, not as a generic crypto
lewis.mccarthy library or a general purpose
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Lewis McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lewis.mccarthy It sounds like you're talking about using MD4 as part
lewis.mccarthy of something else, not as part of SSL or TLS. I see
lewis.mccarthy OpenSSL as an SSL/TLS library, not as a generic
Lewis McCarthy wrote:
Hi,
Evan Carew wrote re: MD4:
Because if it is bundled into a standard package such as this you can
ship source or executable code designed to link to it that will do
things like crack open NT boxes that still use it. Recently, while at
a major bank in the US
I think many people actually see it as both SSL/TLS and generic crypto
library.
Yes. I would like to see such a generic crypto lib and for now OpenSSL
is the only thing available. I prefer CDSA, which is why I like Intel's
offer to integrate OpenSSL and CDSA... :)
/r$
MD4 is used in Heimdal. I assume it's for backward compatibility
(possibly with Kerberos4?) or simply to follow the specs, so I assume
Assars reason to send the patch in is simply to make life easier. I
saw no reason not to put it in, really. Assar, care to comment on that?
I believe
Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe MD4 is necessary for compatibility with Windows 2000.
Yes, but not only that. MD4 is also used in the des-cbc-md4
encryption method and the rsa-md4, and rsa-md4-des checksums.
/assar
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 09:44:02AM +0200, Assar Westerlund wrote:
For some odd reason, md4 is not included in openssl. Here's a patch
that adds it, since it's quite similar to the already existing md5.
Thanks :-)))
As a lot of people I only use libcrypto in OpenSSL (in programs I write,
Hi,
Assar Westerlund wrote:
For some odd reason, md4 is not included in openssl. Here's a patch
that adds it, since it's quite similar to the already existing md5.
Any questions?
MD4 has had a pile of very successful cryptanalysis against it
for some time now. The RSA Security Crypto FAQ
Because if it is bundled into a standard package such as this you can ship
source or executable code designed to link to it that will do things like
crack open NT boxes that still use it. Recently, while at a major bank
in the US Midwest, I had occasion to need a way to get into an NT domain
as
For some odd reason, md4 is not included in openssl. Here's a patch
that adds it, since it's quite similar to the already existing md5.
Any questions?
/assar
diff --exclude=*~ -ruN openssl-0.9.5a.orig/Makefile openssl-0.9.5a/Makefile
--- openssl-0.9.5a.orig/MakefileSat Apr 1
From: Assar Westerlund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
assar For some odd reason, md4 is not included in openssl.
Is MD4 part of any cipher suite used in SSL? If not, I think you have
the odd reason :-).
assar Here's a patch that adds it, since it's quite similar to the
assar already existing md5.
Just
From: Assar Westerlund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
assar For some odd reason, md4 is not included in openssl. Here's a patch
assar that adds it, since it's quite similar to the already existing md5.
Commited.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35
14 matches
Mail list logo
