>
> There are several options which have varying impacts on what speed would
> actually be measuring, I'll outline them below:
> 1) I just remove X25519 support from OpenSSL speed. This is the easiest
> fix but means nobody can use speed to measure performance with the X25519
> curve anymore. This
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:39:13 +
> From: "Linsell, StevenX via RT"
> Running against master branch (commit
> 39c136cc53d7b6fafdd1a0b52c035fd24358e01c - Updates CHANGES and NEWS
> for new release) we see a failure when running openssl speed with the ecdh
> parameter:
>
>
Running against master branch (commit 39c136cc53d7b6fafdd1a0b52c035fd24358e01c
- Updates CHANGES and NEWS for new release) we see a failure when running
openssl speed with the ecdh parameter:
./openssl speed ecdh
Doing 160 bit ecdh's for 10s: 35676 160-bit ECDH ops in 9.98s
Doing 192 bit