If this is still an issue with the current release(s), please open a new
ticket.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Hi Richard,
Thanks for taking a look at this.
[guest - Thu Oct 6 11:55:10 2005]:
This stops our engine working with the openssl application (as it
registers a lock debugging callback) and Apache 2.x (and other apps
too no doubt)
That's because those applications don't set up
john via RT wrote:
Why is it that the static locks have not been removed completely for
0.9.8? If it is to keep some backward compatibility with older apps,
or ones that see no reason to change, would it not be preferable if
the whole of openssl was compatible in this way, including the
[Originally sent by John, all I'm doing is forwarding it to our ticket
database to make sure it gets included. -- Richard Levitte]
Hi Richard,
Thanks for taking a look at this.
[guest - Thu Oct 6 11:55:10 2005]:
This stops our engine working with the openssl application (as it
[Originally sent by John, all I'm doing is forwarding it to our ticket
database to make sure it gets included. -- Richard Levitte]
[And I did it wrong the first time. Appologies for the dupliactes]
Hi Richard,
Thanks for taking a look at this.
[guest - Thu Oct 6 11:55:10 2005]:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:32:30 +0100 (CET),
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
richard [Originally sent by John, all I'm doing is forwarding it to our ticket
richard database to make sure it gets included. -- Richard Levitte]
I did it wrong. Sorry
Hi,
I notice that the chil engine in 0.9.8 has had the hack which allows it to
work with static
locks removed.
This stops our engine working with the openssl application (as it registers a
lock debugging
callback) and Apache 2.x (and other apps too no doubt)
I appologise for not
