On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:44:46 +0200 (CEST)
Ben Laurie via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have
any further questions or concerns, please respond to this message.
I don't agree with this, as steve stated in a previous email:
Instead
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:44:46 +0200 (CEST)
Ben Laurie via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have
any further questions or concerns, please respond to this message.
I don't agree with this, as steve stated in a previous email:
Instead
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007, Pierre-Yves Ritschard via RT wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:44:46 +0200 (CEST)
Ben Laurie via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have
any further questions or concerns, please respond to this message.
I
Hi Steve, thanks for replying !
Well other than the new error codes you are largely making use of
documented functions in OpenSSL so that the whole functionality could
be implemented (with few changes) outside the ssl library at an
application level.
Alright. I could indeed. But this is
