I tested the Feb 18 OpenSSL_0_9_7-stable branch on Solaris 7 (using the
SUNWspro C compiler), just to make sure none of the changes break support
for CryptoSwift. Results were successful: It configures, builds, and when I
build Apache 1.3.23 using this snapshot, I am able to successfully access
Are you in the US BTW if so can you resend you patch with a CC: to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is that the preferred address now, instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
I've tried checking the bxa.doc.gov website, but it's aimed at
commercial exporters instead of OSS exporters.
I have the same results as tim with cc, but gcc does work on Open Server
5.0.6a.
My UnixWare 7.1.1 and OpenUNIX 8.0.0 work.
Thanks,
--
Boyd Gerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZENEZ 3748 Valley Forge Road, Magna Utah 84044
__
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
The OpenSSL 0.9.7 release cycle has started.
Please test the 0.9.7-dev snapshots and report any problems that you
found, even if they have been reported before (it's a good reminder
for us), or even better, send us patches!
Here
Are you in the US BTW if so can you resend you patch with a CC: to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm in Canada...
--
Harald Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It takes a child to raze a village.
-Michael T. Fry
__
OpenSSL
Harald Koch wrote:
Are you in the US BTW if so can you resend you patch with a CC: to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm in Canada...
OK, I've checked in a fix which should do what you want. Let me know of
any problems.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk/
Hi!
Just two slight problems with the Win32/VC6 build:
1) util/libeay.num seems to be missing a couple of entires, namely:
ENGINE_load_aep
ENGINE_load_sureware
These are both in the trunk, but don't seem to have made it out into the
release branch.
2) For some reason, in the
From: Oscar Jacobsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
oscar 1) util/libeay.num seems to be missing a couple of entires, namely:
oscar ENGINE_load_aep
oscar ENGINE_load_sureware
I just commited a libeay.num that have these added. I also changed
the main trunk libeay.num so those two would stay in the same
: 0.9.7 approaching
From: Oscar Jacobsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
oscar 1) util/libeay.num seems to be missing a couple of entires, namely:
oscar ENGINE_load_aep
oscar ENGINE_load_sureware
I just commited a libeay.num that have these added. I also changed
the main trunk libeay.num so those two would
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
I just commited a libeay.num that have these added. I also changed
the main trunk libeay.num so those two would stay in the same position
there as well.
Grand!
According to the Unixly manuals, they are defined in or through
string.h. Is that true in
Please test the 0.9.7-dev snapshots and report any problems that you
found, even if they have been reported before (it's a good reminder
for us), or even better, send us patches!
It used to be possible to call X509_STORE_CTX_init() with a NULL
X509_STORE pointer, in order to use the verifier
Harald Koch wrote:
Please test the 0.9.7-dev snapshots and report any problems that you
found, even if they have been reported before (it's a good reminder
for us), or even better, send us patches!
It used to be possible to call X509_STORE_CTX_init() with a NULL
X509_STORE pointer, in
From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
levitte 3) In the snapshot directory, the 0.9.7-dev snapshots are now called
levitteopenssl-0.9.6-stable-SNAP-{MMDD}.tar.gz, where {MMDD} is
levittereplaced with the datestamp of the snapshot.
That was supposed to say
The OpenSSL 0.9.7 release cycle has started.
Be at ease, we're still a bit away from making betas, there are a
couple of rather serious bugs to fix. However, this means that a few
changes have been made:
1) In the CVS repository, there's now a branch tagged with the name
14 matches
Mail list logo
