So with that in mind, is there a good reason to try and have this
functionality (but working this time!) in the new ASN1 code or should
any existing structure be freed and a new one freshly allocate?
Are refcounts on the ASN1 objects or higher-level? How do you handle
overwrite if the
Rich Salz wrote:
So with that in mind, is there a good reason to try and have this
functionality (but working this time!) in the new ASN1 code or should
any existing structure be freed and a new one freshly allocate?
Are refcounts on the ASN1 objects or higher-level? How do you
Dr S N Henson wrote:
Now since I've never heard a report of this problem I can only assume
hardly anyone uses this parameter. Fixing the existing code is a very
painful task and the only advice that can be given is don't use that
parameter!
There's another case I've just realised that
Does anyone reuse the (type **) parameter to the ASN1 functions and
friends (such as PEM)?
As many of you may know I'm currently revising the OpenSSL code and I'm
seeing what features are used and which should be dumped or fixed. The
parameter is one case where there is a feature which is
