On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 05:57:24PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
So if you directly use the AES API you used to have a little better
performance,
but now you don't get the AES-NI support and so are a factor slower when
using it.
Is this the normal and expected behaviour?
I hope this isn't
Hi,
1.0.1:
$ openssl speed aes-128-cbc:
type 16 bytes 64 bytes256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes
aes-128 cbc 110450.10k 120831.36k 122216.11k 123465.05k 123909.46k
$ openssl speed -evp aes-128-cbc:
type 16 bytes 64 bytes256 bytes 1024
So if you directly use the AES API you used to have a little better
performance,
but now you don't get the AES-NI support and so are a factor slower when
using it.
Is this the normal and expected behaviour?
I hope this isn't true. If it is, it means applications like OpenSSH
that
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 07:16:27PM +0100, Andy Polyakov wrote:
Hi,
1.0.1:
$ openssl speed aes-128-cbc:
type 16 bytes 64 bytes256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192
bytes
aes-128 cbc 110450.10k 120831.36k 122216.11k 123465.05k
123909.46k
$ openssl speed
1.0.1:
$ openssl speed aes-128-cbc:
type 16 bytes 64 bytes256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192
bytes
aes-128 cbc 110450.10k 120831.36k 122216.11k 123465.05k
123909.46k
$ openssl speed -evp aes-128-cbc:
type 16 bytes 64 bytes256 bytes 1024
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 07:24:25PM +0100, Andy Polyakov wrote:
So if you directly use the AES API you used to have a little better
performance,
but now you don't get the AES-NI support and so are a factor slower when
using it.
Is this the normal and expected behaviour?
I hope
So if you directly use the AES API you used to have a little better
performance,
but now you don't get the AES-NI support and so are a factor slower when
using it.
Is this the normal and expected behaviour?
I hope this isn't true. If it is, it means applications like OpenSSH
that
