Hello again,
Is there any way to speed up discussion on this topic?
Cheers,
Fedor.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Fedor Indutny fe...@indutny.com wrote:
Hello devs!
I just found that its impossible to get error from `RAND_bytes()` if
running on default `RAND_SSLeay()` method.
There're
Am 21.10.2013 13:09, schrieb Fedor Indutny:
Hello devs!
I just found that its impossible to get error from `RAND_bytes()` if
running on default `RAND_SSLeay()` method.
There're a couple of reasons and observations, that are confirming it
(sorry for using github, its just more convenient to
Hello Richard,
Yes, I see what this comment means. But what's the difference between
RAND_bytes() and RAND_pseudo_bytes() then? They seems to be using exactly
the same amount of entropy and can't ever fail or return `0` (meaning that
data is insecure).
In my opinion, current implementation could
Am 23.10.2013 18:49, schrieb Fedor Indutny:
Hello Richard,
Yes, I see what this comment means. But what's the difference between
RAND_bytes() and RAND_pseudo_bytes() then? They seems to be using
exactly the same amount of entropy and can't ever fail or return `0`
(meaning that data is
Hello devs!
I just found that its impossible to get error from `RAND_bytes()` if
running on default `RAND_SSLeay()` method.
There're a couple of reasons and observations, that are confirming it
(sorry for using github, its just more convenient to me):
1. `RAND_poll()` is called only once in
