[openssl.org #99] stumped by _ftime : openssl-0.9.7-beta1 make fails @ _ftime on OSX 10.1.4

2002-06-15 Thread R Blake via RT
fontfamilyparamMonaco/paramflushlefthi all, i'm trying to build openssl-0.9.7-beta1 on OSX 10.1.4, but make is dying at an undefined symbol of _ftime. as _ftime is not implemented/deprecated on Darwin, my understanding was that -DUSE_TOD was supposed to circumvent this problem .

Re: [openssl.org #96] bug in config script (gcc 3.1)

2002-06-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:14:43 +0200 (METDST), Lutz Jaenicke via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt Richard: you seem to have a beta version of 3.1.1 around. Will its rt output for -dumpversion somehow fit into the model? : ; gcc -dumpversion 3.1.1 I see no problem.

Re: [openssl.org #85] 0.9.7 prototype constification problems

2002-06-15 Thread Bodo Moeller
Avery Pennarun [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 01:26:42PM +0200, Bodo Moeller via RT wrote: [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 6 18:39:34 2002]: It appears the openssl guys goofed in 0.97beta. The prototype for the d2i_RSAPrivateKey function in 0.9.6c, which I use, is like this:

Re: [openssl.org #97] About 0.9.6a(b) and des_encrypt1()

2002-06-15 Thread Jani Taskinen
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote: There will not be another release of 0.9.6 before 0.9.7 will be out. We still maintain the 0.9.6 tree, because we anticipate that due to incompatible changes between 0.9.6 and 0.9.7 several people will stay with 0.9.6x for some more time, so we

[openssl.org #100]

2002-06-15 Thread via RT
__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I'm away for a week...

2002-06-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Taking some very quickly planned vacation. I'll be back june 24th. Unfortunately, it means that any patching that's expected of me won't be done before then. Happy hacking. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47

Re: [openssl.org #85] 0.9.7 prototype constification problems

2002-06-15 Thread Avery Pennarun
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 12:14:00PM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote: Using const unsigned char **, however, is not 100% api-compatible, because you can't safely pass an unsigned char ** to it, for complicated reasons explained in the URL I sent earlier.

Re: [openssl.org #85] 0.9.7 prototype constification problems

2002-06-15 Thread Bodo Moeller via RT
Avery Pennarun [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 01:26:42PM +0200, Bodo Moeller via RT wrote: [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 6 18:39:34 2002]: It appears the openssl guys goofed in 0.97beta. The prototype for the d2i_RSAPrivateKey function in 0.9.6c, which I use, is like this:

Re: [openssl.org #85] 0.9.7 prototype constification problems

2002-06-15 Thread Avery Pennarun via RT
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 12:14:00PM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote: Using const unsigned char **, however, is not 100% api-compatible, because you can't safely pass an unsigned char ** to it, for complicated reasons explained in the URL I sent earlier.

Re: OpenSSL engine ctrl: handling of strings

2002-06-15 Thread Geoff Thorpe
Hi, On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, [ISO-8859-15] Götz Babin-Ebell wrote: Hello folks, There is a possible problem with the string param handling of ENGINE_ctrl(): (At least I will get a problem...) In the ..._ctrl()-Function of the engines a passed string is only referenced and not copyed. This

Re: [openssl.org #76] Cygwin problems with 0.9.7

2002-06-15 Thread Doug Kaufman
On 05 June 2002, Richard Levitte wrote: [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jun 4 19:47:39 2002]: Building 0.9.7 (snapshot from June 1) with Cygwin led to several warnings during compilation related to the assembly code now included by default. Despite the warnings, it passed the tests in make