Openssl Version 1.1.0 (master as of 22-DEC-15)
Mac OS X 10.11.2
Connection to my SMTP server, which has a 4096-bit RSA key, fails with:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "tls/_openssl.py", line 359, in handshake
error: [Errno 5] 1: TLS handshake with server peer failed:
Hello,
After merge of ECDH and ECDSA and associating method to EC_KEY I would
like to request some additional functionality.
External cryptographic modules may store addition information to key.
What about to define CRYPTO_EX_DATA for ec keys?
Proposed patch "0008-extra-data-for-EC_KEY.patch"
In message <20151222101434.116043c95betf...@www.polarhome.com> on Tue, 22 Dec
2015 10:14:34 +0100, Zoltan Arpadffy said:
zoli> Thank you Richard.
zoli>
zoli> What "slowly" means? Will you be able to commit the OpenVMS build
zoli> scripts before the 1.1.0's release?
Yes.
In message <20151222111022.44086nc6688vq...@www.polarhome.com> on Tue, 22 Dec
2015 11:10:22 +0100, Zoltan Arpadffy said:
zoli> Richard,
zoli>
zoli> > My plan for "new and shiny" is based on perl, running Configure and
zoli> > have it generate a top level descrip.mms.
Fixed.
Kurt
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Hello,
After remove of some global variables in export file left double
information for non existent functions.
For instance before:
X509_CERT_PAIR_it 3534
EXIST:!EXPORT_VAR_AS_FUNCTION:VARIABLE:
X509_CERT_PAIR_it 3534
Hello,
Compilation of an application with current master branch and c89
compiler produce a lot of warnings.
Proposed patch
"0001-__STDC_VERSION__-is-not-defined-for-c89-compilers.patch" fix them.
Regards,
Roumen
>From 7d430516d69e6161eee447833518914e6b473dbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
Thank you Richard.
What "slowly" means? Will you be able to commit the OpenVMS build
scripts before the 1.1.0's release?
Do you need some help with coding, testing?
Should I try to repair the old build scripts?
Thanks,
Z
Quoting Richard Levitte :
The building
In message <20151222122349.916552ojkzhe5...@www.polarhome.com> on Tue, 22 Dec
2015 12:23:49 +0100, Zoltan Arpadffy said:
zoli> Hi,
zoli>
zoli> > zoli> I am aware that having perl installed on a modern operating
zoli> > system is
zoli> > zoli> not a very tough requirement -
I don't know that I would call it a regression, but rather a difference. :)
I'll fix the summary but not the old uncommon behavior.
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Hi,
zoli> > (unfortunately, "cpan install Text::Template" doesn't work because
zoli> > there's a lack of action lines in the test: target it its Makefile,
zoli> > and mms isn't too happy about that...)
That's tough, unfortunately... I've only access to a V8.4 cluster
(Alpha and IA64), so I
This seems like an odd result considering the BeagleBone Black
processor is closer to a NEON. This particular BBB is running a Debian
8.2 based image.
I also believe CFLAGS should include hard-floats (i.e.,
-mfloat-abi=hard). Without it, entropy estimates for some of the RAND_
functions could
> External cryptographic modules may store addition information to key.
> What about to define CRYPTO_EX_DATA for ec keys?
That is the plan -- we will remove EX_EX_DATA and the internal API and just use
the standard crypto_ex_data stuff. Want to make a more complete patch as a
github pull
Hello OpenSSL org:
I found the following issue via code inspection. In
tls_process_client_key_exchange(), when EC is disabled, and an error occurs in
ssl_generate_master_secret() or RAND_bytes(), the error path does not free
rsa_decrypt.
Note that rsa_decrypt is not conditionally defined by
In message <20151222134741.72034a0b79m0z...@www.polarhome.com> on Tue, 22 Dec
2015 13:47:41 +0100, Zoltan Arpadffy said:
zoli> Hi,
zoli>
zoli> > zoli> > (unfortunately, "cpan install Text::Template" doesn't work
zoli> > because
zoli> > zoli> > there's a lack of action lines
Hi,
zoli> May I ask you, if the new build will cover the long names issue (
zoli> symhacks.h ) too?
It's been pointed out to me by the vms-ports folks that it should be
possible to solve using the compiler's "#pragma names shortened"
rather than maintaining symhacks... Then, it's just a
> It is not impossible to maintain a code base that uses up to 32 char long
> function names - without losing the readability of the code.
> I agree that it requires some extra focus from the developers side - but
> coding a security software needs that (and even more) focus anyway.
Yes, but
In message <20151222153437.192023un5jh69...@www.polarhome.com> on Tue, 22 Dec
2015 15:34:37 +0100, Zoltan Arpadffy said:
zoli> Hi,
zoli>
zoli> > zoli> May I ask you, if the new build will cover the long names issue
zoli> > (
zoli> > zoli> symhacks.h ) too?
zoli> >
zoli> >
In message
on Tue,
22 Dec 2015 14:41:16 +, "Salz, Rich" said:
rsalz> Consistency is more important than support for old platforms :)
Side note: I'd like it if we skipped the age slurs, especially
19 matches
Mail list logo