Re: What happend from beta till now.. OpenServer 5.0.X build gccerror...

2002-05-12 Thread Boyd Lynn Gerber
The fix is to remove -DFILIO_H form the sco5-gcc-shared in Configure. Thanks, -- Boyd Gerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] ZENEZ 1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah 84047 __ OpenSSL Project

For 0.9.6d a is missing from the shlib/svr5-shared-gcc.sh FLAGSline

2002-05-12 Thread Boyd Lynn Gerber
I just noticed that a is missing and version change. *** svr5-shared-gcc.sh.org Thu Sep 6 06:30:17 2001 --- svr5-shared-gcc.sh Sat May 11 15:37:00 2002 *** *** 1,7 #!/usr/bin/sh major=0 ! minor=9.6b slib=libssl sh_slib=$slib.so.$major.$minor --- 1,7

-Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-05-12 Thread Solar Designer
JFYI, when updating our package from 0.9.6c to 0.9.6d I've noticed that the new shared libcrypto library doesn't work anymore. The openssl(1) binary wouldn't recognize any of the block ciphers. I tracked this down to the addition of -Wl,-Bsymbolic. Removing that option solved the problem for

how to include openssl files in our programe

2002-05-12 Thread Hafiz Abdurrahman
Sir After instalation of ssl I use library of ssl but when I compile the programe, the message comes that can't include the files(header files). Please tell me how to set the path. So that the programe will compile and execute. regards hafiz mail at : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[STATUS] OpenSSL (Sun 12-May-2002)

2002-05-12 Thread OpenSSL Project
OpenSSL STATUS Last modified at __ $Date: 2002/05/09 23:54:02 $ DEVELOPMENT STATE o OpenSSL 0.9.7: Under development... o OpenSSL 0.9.6d: Released on May9th, 2002 o OpenSSL 0.9.6c: Released on

Re: Announce: Time Stamp Protocol (RFC 3161) patch

2002-05-12 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 11:23:53PM +0100, Zoltan Glozik wrote: Hi All, I am working on an extension to OpenSSL that implements the Time Stamp protocol as specified in RFC 3161 and it reached a quite stable state to make it available to the public. If you are interested you can find the

Re: For 0.9.6d a is missing from the shlib/svr5-shared-gcc.sh FLAGS line

2002-05-12 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 03:54:52PM -0600, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote: I just noticed that a is missing and version change. *** svr5-shared-gcc.sh.org Thu Sep 6 06:30:17 2001 --- svr5-shared-gcc.sh Sat May 11 15:37:00 2002 ... *** *** 9,15 clib=libcrypto

Re: [openssl.org #26] 64 bit Suse Linux on PowerPC

2002-05-12 Thread
Thank you Lutz and Tim. By configuring with the following: ./Configure linux-ppc I was able to run make successfully and then run make test and make install successfully as well. I was able therefore to successfully build, run the build verification tests and install on the 64 bit Suse Linux on

[openssl.org #26] 64 bit Suse Linux on PowerPC

2002-05-12 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
Thanks. I have added a corresponding entry into config. Please check out a new snapshot for correct behaviour. Best regards, Lutz __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development

Re: SSL_shutdown.3 makewhatis failure under IRIX

2002-05-12 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 04:55:16PM -0400, Rick Troxel wrote: In order for makewhatis -M under IRIX 6.5.14m not to fail on SSL_shutdown.3 as follows: nroff: Macro argument too long; line 170, file /usr/local/man/man3/SSL_shutdown.3 stack: N I found it necessary (well, at least

[openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-05-12 Thread Solar Designer via RT
JFYI, when updating our package from 0.9.6c to 0.9.6d I've noticed that the new shared libcrypto library doesn't work anymore. The openssl(1) binary wouldn't recognize any of the block ciphers. I tracked this down to the addition of -Wl,-Bsymbolic. Removing that option solved the problem for

[openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-05-12 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun May 12 22:48:56 2002]: JFYI, when updating our package from 0.9.6c to 0.9.6d I've noticed that the new shared libcrypto library doesn't work anymore. The openssl(1) binary wouldn't recognize any of the block ciphers. I tracked this down to the addition of