On Jun 27, 2011, at 11:02 PM, Robin Seggelmann wrote:
Hi Yogesh,
Yes, I noticed that after I wrote the mail. The server starts a timer after
sending the HelloVerifyRequest, although it's not supposed to. A patch is
submitted already, but has not yet appeared on the OpenSSL request
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 22:20, Wim Lewis w...@omnigroup.com wrote:
On 27 Jun 2011, at 9:27 AM, yoni londner wrote:
As you know, on 32bit systems, when using EBP for anything other than
holding the stack base, it is very difficult to get reasonable backtrace.
this can be fixed if directing
All,
I'm having a problem when building OpenSSL 1.0.1 along with fips-2.0.
My layout is like this:
/home/tyrel/openssl-test/openssl -- contains the 1.0.1 branch from CVS
/home/tyrel/openssl-test/fips -- contains the extract fips-2.0
snapshot tarball
My build steps are (from the openssl-test
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011, Tyrel Haveman wrote:
All,
I'm having a problem when building OpenSSL 1.0.1 along with fips-2.0.
My layout is like this:
/home/tyrel/openssl-test/openssl -- contains the 1.0.1 branch from CVS
/home/tyrel/openssl-test/fips -- contains the extract fips-2.0
snapshot
On 28 Jun 2011, at 12:21 AM, yoni londner wrote:
1. I looked at a generated assembler from gcc. So I am not 100% sure what is
the 'most correct', but this is what gcc emits.
I was concerned that since this routine isn't compiler-generated it might be
doing something different from what
