Hi Matt
Trying out your patch. Will keep you posted. In meanwhile we ran into more
valgrind issues .. on the server end. Can you please comment on them?
==621== 8,680 (1,488 direct, 7,192 indirect) bytes in 62 blocks are
definitely lost in loss record 899 of 952
==621==at 0x4A05F80: malloc
There's a very useful -timeout option in the ocsp utility which is not
mentioned in the manpage or the help output.
diff --git a/apps/ocsp.c b/apps/ocsp.c
index 902546f..0c6579d 100644
--- a/apps/ocsp.c
+++ b/apps/ocsp.c
@@ -650,6 +650,7 @@ int MAIN(int argc, char **argv)
Hi,
Matt, looks like your last commit fixed the memory leak from PR#3572. I've
tested with valgrind with the test application and no more leaks reported.
Thanks!
Regards,
Dmitry
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Praveen Kariyanahalli prav...@viptela.com
wrote:
Hi Matt
Trying out your patch.
Hi,
Matt, looks like your last commit fixed the memory leak from PR#3572. I've
tested with valgrind with the test application and no more leaks reported.
Thanks!
Regards,
Dmitry
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Praveen Kariyanahalli prav...@viptela.com
wrote:
Hi Matt
Trying out your patch.
On 26/11/14 18:06, Dmitry Sobinov via RT wrote:
Hi,
Matt, looks like your last commit fixed the memory leak from PR#3572. I've
tested with valgrind with the test application and no more leaks reported.
Thanks!
Thanks for letting us know Dmitry - I will close that ticket.
Matt
Dmitry has reported that this has been fixed by this commit:
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=8a35dbb6d89a16d792b79b157b3e89443639ec94
Closing this ticket
Matt
__
OpenSSL Project
On 25/11/14 23:20, Praveen Kariyanahalli wrote:
Hi Matt
Trying out your patch. Will keep you posted. In meanwhile we ran into
more valgrind issues .. on the server end. Can you please comment on them?
==621== 8,680 (1,488 direct, 7,192 indirect) bytes in 62 blocks are
definitely lost in
On 25/11/14 23:20, Praveen Kariyanahalli wrote:
Hi Matt
Trying out your patch. Will keep you posted. In meanwhile we ran into
more valgrind issues .. on the server end. Can you please comment on them?
==621== 8,680 (1,488 direct, 7,192 indirect) bytes in 62 blocks are
definitely lost in
Hi Matt
See inline ..
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Matt Caswell via RT r...@openssl.org wrote:
On 25/11/14 23:20, Praveen Kariyanahalli wrote:
Hi Matt
Trying out your patch. Will keep you posted. In meanwhile we ran into
more valgrind issues .. on the server end. Can you please