Re: [openssl.org #96] bug in config script (gcc 3.1)

2002-06-14 Thread Allen Hopkins
14:52:11 -0700, Allen Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: allenh I'm afraid this was not a fix. Have you tried it with gcc-3.1? allenh I encountered this problem with the 0.9.6d snapshot. I tried it just now, GCCVER becamse 31, and my output was -- gcc (GCC) 3.1.1 20020606 (Debian

[openssl.org #96] bug in config script

2002-06-13 Thread Allen Hopkins via RT
The config script needs to use gcc -dumpversion instead of gcc --version to determine the gcc version. gcc-3.1 outputs a bunch of text with --version, but just the number with -dumpversion, which also works for gcc-2.95. Sorry if this is old news, which it may be. -Allen Hopkins UCBerkeley

Re: [openssl.org #96] bug in config script (gcc 3.1)

2002-06-14 Thread Allen Hopkins via RT
14:52:11 -0700, Allen Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: allenh I'm afraid this was not a fix. Have you tried it with gcc-3.1? allenh I encountered this problem with the 0.9.6d snapshot. I tried it just now, GCCVER becamse 31, and my output was -- gcc (GCC) 3.1.1 20020606 (Debian

Re: [openssl.org #96] bug in config script (gcc 3.1)

2002-06-14 Thread Allen Hopkins via RT
I agree that simply using -dumpversion makes more sense, on the assumption that it will always only output the number. --version appears to be intended to be human-readable, not machine-readable, and its format may change at any time, as it just did. Why keep adding sed commands that say, oh,