hi,
We have ssl (VERSION=0.9.7-dev) in the OpenBSD-CURRENT.
Now we dig the problem in ${PORTS}/comms/kermit.
cc -O2 -DBSD44 -DCK_CURSES -DCK_NEWTERM -DTCPSOCKET -DOPENBSD
-DUSE_UU_LOCK -DFNFLOAT -DUSE_STRERROR -DCKHTTP -DCK_SSL
-DCK_AUTHENTICATION -DCK_ENCRYPTION -DCK_DES
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:10:58PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jun 5 14:48:52 2002]:
ck_ssl.c: In function k_tn_tls_negotiate':
ck_ssl.c:3232: ID_uniqueIdentifier' undeclared (first use in this
function)
ck_ssl.c:3232: (Each undeclared identifier is
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:46:28AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
For instance, mod_ssl 2.8.8-1.3.24 use workaround:
#ifndef NID_uniqueIdentifier
#define NID_uniqueIdentifier 102
#endif
I don't like this option. As it is now, the new (correct)
NID_uniqueIdentifier is
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:46:28AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
Also, markus@ created this temp patch:
+@@ -102,6 +104,13 @@
+ !ERROR This module requires OpenSSL 0.9.5a or higher
+ #endif /* OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER */
+ #endif /* SSLDLL */
++
++#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER
Hi,
Got question while having fun with coredumps in apache:
# mdb ./core.httpd.29115
Loading modules: [ libc.so.1 libuutil.so.1 ld.so.1 ]
::stack
libc.so.1`__lwp_park+0x14(dec86a00, 0, ff041910, 0, 1c00, 1d3c)
libc.so.1`malloc+0x44(64, 1, e8070, fe6cc190, ff03e3c0, ff0485b8)
Nothing serious, having fun.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Richard Levitte rich...@levitte.org wrote:
In message aanlkti=pbdtbjslol_1tybfzznw8cilauuomcvzxd...@mail.gmail.com
on Fri, 8 Oct 2010 16:30:22 +0300, Mike Pechkin mike.pech...@gmail.com
said:
mike.pechkin I see the different ways
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:10:58PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jun 5 14:48:52 2002]:
ck_ssl.c: In function k_tn_tls_negotiate':
ck_ssl.c:3232: ID_uniqueIdentifier' undeclared (first use in this
function)
ck_ssl.c:3232: (Each undeclared identifier
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:46:28AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
For instance, mod_ssl 2.8.8-1.3.24 use workaround:
#ifndef NID_uniqueIdentifier
#define NID_uniqueIdentifier 102
#endif
I don't like this option. As it is now, the new (correct)
NID_uniqueIdentifier is
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:46:28AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
Also, markus@ created this temp patch:
+@@ -102,6 +104,13 @@
+ !ERROR This module requires OpenSSL 0.9.5a or higher
+ #endif /* OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER */
+ #endif /* SSLDLL */
++
++#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER
