In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 05 Jun 2002 09:43:45 -0400, Rich
Salz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rsalz Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
rsalz Can I assume that sed exists and works properly? dirname can be
rsalz coded like this:
rsalz
rsalz echo $$i | sed -e 's|[^/]*$||' -e 's|/$||'
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 05 Jun 2002 09:32:44 -0400, Rich
Salz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rsalz However, double declaration isn't an error, at least if the
rsalz declarations are exactly the same. Until someone comes up with a
rsalz better solution to break the circular
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:52:11 -0700,
Allen Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
allenh I'm afraid this was not a fix. Have you tried it with gcc-3.1?
allenh I encountered this problem with the 0.9.6d snapshot.
I tried it just now, GCCVER becamse 31, and my output was
From: Jani Taskinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sniper From CHANGES:
sniper
sniper *) Rename 'des_encrypt' to 'des_encrypt1'. This avoids the clashes
sniper with des_encrypt() defined on some operating systems, like Solaris
sniper and UnixWare.
sniper [Richard Levitte]
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:14:43 +0200
(METDST), Lutz Jaenicke via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Richard: you seem to have a beta version of 3.1.1 around. Will its
rt output for -dumpversion somehow fit into the model?
: ; gcc -dumpversion
3.1.1
I see no problem.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:01:27
+0200 (METDST), Lutz Jaenicke via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Obviously Richard missed your submission before leaving for a short
rt vacation (he took responsibility for Ticket #75, so I didn't want to
rt interfere with him).
rt I
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 27 Jun 2002 16:10:55
+0200 (METDST), Brian Havard via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt The output for VMS does change a little but
rt looks quite broken anyway (EXETYPE WINDOWS?).
VMS doesn't use .def files. Look at VMS/mkshared.com instead for
VMS. That
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:05:57 +0200
(METDST), Richard Levitte via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 27 17:30:55 2002]:
rt
rt That's funny, it's in my image, and I just zipped the entire thing up.
rt
rt And now I discovered that
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:43:08
+0200 (METDST), Michel Mac Wing via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
e_os.h was never meant to be exported. Starting with 0.9.7, it really
isn't exported any more. It's a mistake for external applications to
try to use it and has always
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:53:45
+0200 (METDST), Lutz Jaenicke via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt This problem has already been reported before twice, but as no member
rt of the OpenSSL developers team has Mac OS/X arround, we cannot
rt debug the problem ourselves.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 15 Jul 2002 21:02:21
+0200 (METDST), Jonathan Louie via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt well, maybe i'm doing this wrong, but i added -Xlinker -flatnamespace
rt to CCFLAGS and this is the last bit of output:
It's spelled -flat_namespace.
--
Richard Levitte
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 18 Jul 2002
11:17:41 +0200, Bodo Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
moeller I think this is wrong.
moeller
moeller The output file is opened in text mode (not binary), so on systems
moeller where line ends are usually CRLF, the \r\n will result in CR CR LF
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 18 Jul 2002 21:07:10 +0100, Ben
Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
ben The issue as reported to me was that the body had CRLF, but headers LF
ben only...
ben
ben Seems to me they should be consistent.
I agree. However, what kinds of complications does that
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 18 Jul 2002 22:07:57
+0200 (METDST), Ben Laurie via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt The issue as reported to me was that the body had CRLF, but headers LF
rt only...
I just tried to find the places where the body would get a \r
anywhere, and failed. Did
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 21 Jul
2002 13:33:56 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
dkaufman The patch (djgpp.last-patch) doesn't work as posted to RT, but I think
dkaufman that I have modified it to what you intended. Also the modifications
dkaufman for pod2mantest you
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:26:34
+0200 (METDST), Jeffrey Altman via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Need to add it to the exports list.
For anyone who has the time, the fix is to move the declaration (but
not the macro die()) from cryptlib.h to crypto.h, then do a make
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:49:00 +0100, Ben
Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
ben OK, I don't understand why it needs to be exported - isn't it internal
ben to the library? But assuming it does, I prefer the original suggestions
ben (i.e. move the declaration of
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 30 Jul 2002
10:56:29 EDT, Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jaltman
jaltman OK, I don't understand why it needs to be exported - isn't it internal
jaltman to the library? But assuming it does, I prefer the original suggestions
jaltman (i.e. move
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 30 Jul 2002 19:36:18
+0200 (METDST), Lutz Jaenicke via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Shall we disable the crypt() function for more platforms, maybe
rt even all platforms?
Maybe we should have a macro OPENSSL_NO_CRYPT, which is defined by
default...
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 31 Jul 2002 09:23:03
+0200 (METDST), Richard Reed via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt The output of 'make report' speaks for itself:
The FAQ says the following:
* Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on MacOS X?
If the failure happens when trying to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 9 Aug 2002 18:46:24
+0200 (METDST), download (Jim Prewett) via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I'm sorry to bother you again, but check this out:
rt
rt http://www.redhat.com/swr/i686/openssl-0.9.6b-18.i686_dp.html
rt
rt Which says:
rt
rt Provides
rt The
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:31:15
+0200 (METDST), jackluomail via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I would like to use openssl on arm7312.
rt But many crypt algorithm is asm for x386,
rt
rt Could you tell me where I can get this code
rt for arm7323?
Have you tried
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 15 Aug
2002 18:53:11 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
dkaufman I recently tried to compile the August 9th snapshot of openssl 0.9.7
dkaufman with static zlib enabled. The build failed because Configure only adds
dkaufman -lz for dynamic
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 16 Aug
2002 23:32:19 +0200 (MEST), Rainer Orth [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
ro With the introduction of public key cryptography into the Network Time
ro Protocol (NTP v4, cf. http://www.ntp.org/), the current version of NTP
ro became a heavy user of OpenSSL.
ro
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:55:16
+0200 (METDST), Andreas Sterbenz via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt Any chance of making progress on this?
rt
rt As a reminder, the issue is that the Kerberos ciphersuites in OpenSSL do
rt not use the IDs defined in RFC2712, which
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:55:14
+0200 (METDST), Jeffrey Altman via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Thanks for identifying the typos, I just committed an appropriate
change (I hope). Please check the next snapshot.
rt Just tried to build this and it fails:
rt
rt
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 16 Oct 2002 20:49:37
+0200 (METDST), Igor Pechtchanski via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I'm probably nitpicking, but line 1 of util/mkcerts.sh is missing a '/' in
rt the magic header: (currently #!bin/sh). If the script is meant to be
rt run directly, the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:17:39
+0200 (METDST), [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Arun (GMI) via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Kumar making all in crypto/rand...
Kumar cc -I.. -I../../include -O -c md_rand.c
Kumar /usr/include/iso/stdlib_iso.h, line 116:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 17 Oct 2002 21:52:02
+0200 (METDST), John Viega via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
As I commented for ticket 306, you probably want the behavior of CFB-8
and CFB-8. We haven't implemented that.
To make it easier to understand what you're talking about, it
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 17 Oct
2002 16:34:55 -0400, John Viega [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
viega Perhaps it would help to show you how things work differently in 0.9.6
viega and 0.9.7. Try this code out in each one:
viega
viega #include openssl/evp.h
viega
viega int main(int argc,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 17 Oct 2002 23:16:17
+0200 (METDST), Olaf Kirch via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt With 0.9.6, decrypting an odd number of octets worked, whereas in 0.9.7
rt it doesn't.
I concluded in #306 that this is really a bug in 0.9.7 beta3, and that
current snapshot
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:46:24
+0200 (METDST), John Viega via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 04:22 PM, Richard Levitte - VMS
rt Whacker wrote:
rt
rt Those modes *require* that a multiple of {block_size} bytes get
rt through to get
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:44:42
+0100 (MET), Frédéric Giudicelli via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt apps/ca.c:1459
rt if (!X509_CRL_set_issuer_name(crl, X509_get_issuer_name(x509))) goto err;
rt
rt Shouldn't it be
rt if (!X509_CRL_set_issuer_name(crl,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:44:33
+0100 (MET), Frédéric Giudicelli via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt The authorityKeyIdentifier extension seems to behave weirdly...
rt
rt I have a two level CA architecture:
rt ROOT CA
rt INTERMEDIATE CA
rt For both CA:
rt
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 31 Oct 2002 23:19:17
+0100 (MET), Frédéric Giudicelli via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt All I know, is that MS Windows 2000 SP3 consider the chain broken,
rt it links the EndUser Cert with the ROOT CERT, and since the issuer
rt of the EndUser Cert is not
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 1 Nov 2002 00:51:24
+0100 (MET), Frédéric Giudicelli via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Well Microsoft support tells me it's openssl's fault, and you tell
rt me it's microsoft's?
I'm basing what I say, not only on the way it's implemented, but also
on
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 1 Nov 2002 16:57:24
+0100 (MET), Lucas C via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt - There is something wrong with the macros that
rt disable hardware support. Some parts of the build
rt procedure think it is not necessary to build the
rt hardware support engines,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:45:26
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I would like to use your Open SSL 0.9.6 for web project for security
rt purpose..
rt These are the Steps we did.
rt
rt 1) Downloaded the files(
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 5 Nov 2002 08:57:10
+0100 (MET), Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt What about trying to do the following before running nmake:
rt
rt C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio .Net\VC7\bin\VCVARS32
rt
rt If this doesn't work
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:24:16
+0100 (MET), Ernst G Giessmann via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Run in your doc/apps directory
rt
rt fgrep =head1 NAME *.pod
rt
rt you'll get
rt
rt CA.pl.pod:=head1 NAME
rt asn1parse.pod:=head1 NAME
rt ...more files
rt
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:54:21
+0100 (MET), Jack Lloyd via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Looks like the 1.1 TLS draft spec uses the same wording. Perhaps someone
rt should contact the TLS WG and ask for a clarification on this issue? [I'll
rt do it if nobody else is
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:55:26
+0100 (MET), Solar Designer via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt * Wed Sep 25 2002 Solar Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rt - Don't do an explicit make build-shared, it's not needed and could only
rt cause harm (link libssl against libcrypto
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:54:31 +0300,
Solar Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
solar I've now tried removing the patch from our 0.9.6g package and what I
solar get is:
solar
solar 1. Both versions appear to produce a working library now, however:
solar
solar 2. The
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:26:26
+0100 (MET), Solar Designer via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Well, I left it in because the original Makefile would build it too.
rt Is that just to support Configure rsaref?
Yes.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:33:29
+0100 (MET), Michael Bell via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Thanks a lot. It looks great. One question - I checked
rt crypto/objects/objects.txt and see that the OIDs for Microsoft's
rt smartcardlogin are still not present. Can
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 18 Nov 2002 23:40:15
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Currently using ...
rt
rtCompaq TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS Alpha Version V5.3
rton a AlphaServer 1200 5/533 4MB running OpenVMS V7.3-1
rtCompaq C V6.5-001 on
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:23:17
+0100 (MET), Wieckowski, Tom via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Can't locate strict.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
rt /usr/lib/perl-5.6.0/lib/5.6.0/alp
rt ha-dec_osf /usr/lib/perl-5.6.0/lib/5.6.0
rt /usr/lib/perl-5.6.0/lib/site_perl/5.6.0
rt
Heimdal support is not, unfortunately. I once tried to do a port, and
what you see is the result as far as I came. Unfortunately, I didn't
get all the way, there are some things I wasn't able to map. MIT KRB5
and Heimdal differ more than one might expect.
So, perfectly honestly, Heimdal
In message 001601c2940a$deed1b60$06a8a8c0@dell8200 on Sun, 24 Nov 2002 16:43:12
-0600, pobox [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
ghstark What will the current implementation of thedecompressor in
ghstark OpenSSL do in each of these cases?
Unless this can be determined, it can be tested by having several
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:32:30
+0100 (MET), Jeffrey Altman via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt What is the appropriate size for 'buf' in DSA_size()?
rt
rt 4 bytes is certainly not correct. My guess is that we want to support at
rt least 256 bits and so it needs to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:56:16
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Builds OK on
rt
rt Compaq C V6.4-005 on OpenVMS VAX V7.3
rt Compaq TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS VAX Version V5.3
rt on a VAXstation 4000-60 running OpenVMS V7.3
rt
I just started working on making symlinks for all names in the NAME
section of every .pod file we're converting into manpages. The
benefit is that the manuals are available by function name, and users
won't have to try to guess the name of the manpage any more.
Applying some changes on
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:35:29
+0100 (MET), Lutz Jaenicke via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 03:23:02PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
wrote:
rt
rt I just started working on making symlinks for all names in the NAME
rt
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 1 Dec 2002 01:02:16
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt It seems as if you have answered your own earlier suggestion to me. I
rt can confirm this. With OPSNSSL_NO_ASM defined true BETA 4 builds, tests
rt and works with WASD OK
The vms.mar I sent you had a small but important bug. Please try this
one instead.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:48:27
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt happy to try the attached file ... as soon as you attach it!
Don't use any of them. It still doesn't work for all numbers. EDIV
is very hard to use for divisors that it
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 2 Dec 2002 22:30:20
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Ah, that is a good point in the case where we saw
rt this, the source bio was a bio_s_mem, i.e. a memory
rt bio, so it was not doing r text-mode eol
rt translation. In
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:24:39
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Could someone verify independently that SSL_CERT_FILE doesn't
rt allow reading certificates in non-default locations?
I can verify, by looking at the code, that
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 4 Dec 2002 18:08:25
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I can go and cripple the engine.pod documentation if absolutely necessary,
rt but it simply seems a somewhat shortsighted solution (even if
rt alliterative :-). IIRC
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 4 Dec 2002 20:24:30
+0100 (MET), Stephen Henson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt The existing code could be fixed to handle other cases, for example by
rt dumping that BIO_gets() replacing with a BIO_read() loop and converting
rt the buffer in place.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:03:20
+0100 (MET), via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -fPIC -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H
rt -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
rt -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -c hw_cryptodev.c
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:36:15 +, Joe
Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jorton Ah, I've found this in sys/param.h:
jorton
jorton #define OpenBSD 200105 /* OpenBSD version (year month). */
jorton #define OpenBSD2_9 1/* OpenBSD 2.9 */
jorton
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 05 Dec 2002 15:36:56 -0500, Rich
Salz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rsalz If the file pointed at with SSL_CERT_FILE is faulty in any way, the
rsalz code will fall back to the built-in default. If that fails, an error
rsalz is generated. How much does that
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 10 Dec 2002 08:24:09
+0100 (MET), Jeyalakshmi via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Please resend those questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This kind of post does not belong in our request tracker (the
intention of the request tracker is to track down bugs in OpenSSL,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:17:52
+0100 (MET), David Asher via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt ummm... I think you sent this to the wrong person... I reported the bug.
Don't worry about it. You're the registered requestor, that's why you
got a copy directly. Andy is a
I can see that happening. Would the following patch help?
Index: ssl/ssl_ciph.c
===
RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/ssl/ssl_ciph.c,v
retrieving revision 1.33.2.3
diff -u -u -r1.33.2.3 ssl_ciph.c
--- ssl/ssl_ciph.c 19 Jul 2002
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:03:14
+0100 (MET), amjad qurum via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt dear sir
rt i had the following error while trying to run the
rt OPENSSL on my sun solaries 8 server .
The error shown means you don't have a C compiler installed. I'll
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from slim.vsm.com.au (slim.vsm.com.au [150.101.13.2])
by brev.stacken.kth.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA25429
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:57:05 +0100 (MET)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from vsm.com.au by vsm.com.au
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:01:40
+0100 (MET), Lutz Jaenicke via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt * lots of messages during 'make depend' apparently from the pre-processor:
rt ../util/domd .. -MD makedepend -- -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DL
-DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5
The problem is when an EDIV will produce a negative quotient from the
division of two positive numbers. An example is the following call:
q = bn_div_words(0xC0171716, 0xAB9A, 0xC0171717);
q is supposed to get the result 0x. Unfortunately, the way
the numbers are handled to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 20 Dec 2002 22:09:03
+0100 (MET), Jeff A. Earickson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
rt 0xc002ea68 in kill ()
rt (gdb) backtrace
rt #0 0xc002ea68 in kill ()
rt #1 0xc002de2c in raise ()
rt #2 0xc00282a8 in
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 23 Dec 2002 15:14:46
+0100 (MET), Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Danm! The very same thing happened to me earlier! You have to 'find .
rt -name lib -size 0 -exec rm {} \;' if you delete libcrypto.a. Sorry:-)
rt Alternative is to start from
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 24 Dec 2002 16:59:34
+0100 (MET), Verdon Walker via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt This does not seem to have shown up in the contributions area. Are we
rt still waiting for an update or did something go wrong?
Something went wrong, index.html wasn't
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 24 Dec 2002 18:46:47
+0100 (MET), via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt $ ./tx509
rt testing X509 conversions
rt p - d
rt p - n
rt p - p
rt d - d
rt n - d
rt p - d
rt d - n
rt n - n
rt p - n
rt d - p
rt n - p
rt p - p
No error, eh? Can you try to download
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 24 Dec 2002 21:57:42
+0100 (MET), Mohler, Bruce via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt test BN_sqr
rt Square test failed!
rt
rt In the test sub-directory, there is an output file called tmp.bntest. The
rt very end of that file contains:
rt
rt print test
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 26 Dec 2002 22:38:42
+0100 (MET), Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Richard! How come this ticket made to 0.9.[78] STATUS? The question was
rt originally about 0.9.6h[-engine] and the issue is not relevant in
rt 0.9.[78] context.
Because I
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:26:48
+0100 (MET), Jeff A. Earickson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt No, you can assume that I've been on vacation for the week.
OK, my appologies, and I hope you had a good vacation.
Can you do a test run on the latest snapshot, please?
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 29 Dec 2002 21:57:59
+0100 (MET), Ricardo Ariel Gorosito via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt [openssl-097-snap 2002-12-28 build on RedHat8 with MIT's krb5 libs]
rt
rt When I try to build packages that include ssl.h, it fail on:
rt
rt ---START
rt In file
OK, I've hacked a little. Please try the following patch on a 0.9.7
snapshot, and put the attached openssl-shared.txt in doc/:
Index: Makefile.org
===
RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/Makefile.org,v
retrieving revision 1.154.2.49
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:43:26
+0100 (MET), Jimmy Cheng Sze Ngee via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Problem had been resolved. Thanks.
OK. Thanks.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52
I just test, with OpenSSL 0.9.7a-dev (fresh checkout), the command to
generate a self-signed cerificate according to the example in
x509.pod:
openssl x509 -in cert.pem -addtrust sslclient \
-alias Steve's Class 1 CA -out trust.pem
I expected it to fail because it wouldn't find those
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:49:31
+0100 (MET), Stephen Henson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I've analysed this further and the cause seems to be that it bcc 5.5
rt complains about taking the address of a structure that doesn't have a
rt complete definition.
rt
rt
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:26:40
+0100 (MET), Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Current version,
rt openssl-0.9.7, does not support shared libraries on AIX platform.
rt
rt To openssl-dev mainly. How come did do_aix-shared deserve so special
rt
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:01:39
+0100 (MET), Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt rt To openssl-dev mainly. How come did do_aix-shared deserve so special
rt rt treatment? I mean SHAREDFLAGS being hardcoded directly in Makefile.org?
rt rt Just wondering...
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:40:24
+0100 (MET), via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Currently, on many Unix platforms I link my application against
rt libssl.so and libcrypto.so. Typically, these are links set to resolve
rt down to the versioned types of these files,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 27 Jan 2003 23:33:24
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Actually, I'd prefer that I wouldn't have to relink and
rt redistribute my application every time a security patch comes out
rt for OpenSSL. I haven't seen any issues in
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 31 Jan 2003 04:59:36
+0100 (MET), via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt [steve - Thu Jan 30 20:44:34 2003]:
rt
rt However no version of OpenSSL will currently display that correctly.
rt
rt This isn't very friendly and proper IPv6 support will be added
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 31 Jan 2003 15:50:06
+0100 (MET), Bodo Moeller via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt A second theory is that OpenSSL should always clear the error queue by
rt calling ERR_clear_error() if stuff left in the error queue might cause
rt confusion later.
The problem
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:36:54
+0100 (MET), Holger Sesterhenn via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt PKCS7_sign() uses SMIME_crlf_copy() to assure '\r\n' at EOL before signing.
rt BIO_write() is used. Does BIO_write() use the C library? If it does, we
rt have the same
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 14 Feb 2003 21:18:45
+0100 (MET), via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt Hi,
rt
rt I'm using the latest (0.9.7) Crypto lib to encrypt a string of clear
rt text, by using CBC mode with IV preset to 8 bytes of 0x00.
rt When the encrypted text was decrypted
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 20 Feb 2003 11:16:25
+0100 (MET), Alexey Semenov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt try ./config shared no-engine, then compile.
rt Apache 1.3.27/mod_ssl crashes with segmentation fault.
rt if i remove 'no-engine' - all ok,
rt linux 2.4.19/gcc 2.95.3/glibc
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:34:52 +0100 (MET), via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt ./config shared
rt
rt make test fails as we use LD_LIBRARY_PATH
rt
rt The Makefiles in ./ and ./tests set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to `pwd`
rt rather than `pwd`:$$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
rt
rt Is this a
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:51:20 +0100 (MET), Alexey
Semenov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I'll try as soon as fix will be available with new release -
rt 0.9.7b I suppose.
I'd like to ask you to please consider fetching
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 25 Mar 2003 20:15:51 +0100 (MET), via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt ld: error: libc.so.6, needed by /usr/lib/libdl.so, conflicts with
rt libc.so.5
Eeeep, looks like you have a dirty installation...
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:46:04 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt All the tests run fine until the final apps/openssl version -a
rt
rt
rt make[1]: Leaving directory
rt `/usr/local/src/openssl/openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030323/test'
rt
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 2 Apr 2003 09:23:17 +0200 (METDST), Matthew
Fleming via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I am using openssl v. 0.9.7a. I have compiled static libraries and am
rt trying to create an application that links to those libraries. I am
rt developing with Visual
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11 Jun 2003 09:21:49 +0200 (METDST), Charles B
Cranston via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt Possible bug in OpenSSL 0.9.6h on Solaris 2.8 with /dev/urandom
rt
rt The rsa command fails strangely when attempting to use
rt both -passin fd:int and -passout
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 19 Jun 2003 08:51:58 +0200 (METDST), Bob
Hepple via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I am busy porting OpenSSL to the Eracom hardware engine and have run into
rt a problem when entering PINS (ie using fgets() without echo). Thought I'd
rt share the workaround
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 3 Jul 2003 23:09:05 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups As I said earlier, you don't have to implement it, however
groups that would be nice if you could make the cutsom error handling
groups code work, which would allow me to implement
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 4 Jul 2003 00:12:24 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups The problem is the following, yes your code (ERR_pop_to_mark/ERR_set_mark)
groups is fine when a child function is adding a new error, however, what happends
groups when it calls
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
