On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:53:17AM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 10.02.2015 um 21:30 schrieb Matt Caswell:
On 10/02/15 19:23, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hello everyone,
I sent a mail to r...@openssl.org 3 days ago, subject OpenSSL 1.0.2 make
test bus error in evp_test (Solaris 10 Sparc, sun4u).
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014, Piotr Sikora wrote:
(for some reason it was never received by rt@, so resending here)
Slipped through the moderation queue, sorry. It is in RT now.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke jaeni...@openssl.org
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Due to a misunderstanding within the OpenSSL team we ran into trouble
with our mail and mailing service still hosted at the old server
(hopefully I will be able to complete the migration to the new server
over the Christmas break).
Caused by a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
The new server currently hosting the www, git, rt, ftp, and cvs
services is going to be moved within the installation of our hoster.
As a consequence, the system will be assigned a new IP address.
Old: 178.16.220.54
New: 185.9.166.106
The
Applied.
Thanks,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
On 02/07/2013 03:35 PM, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to follow the steps for cloning the git repository found on
http://www.openssl.org/source/repos.html from behind a proxy. The proxy
does not allow connections to the git port 9418.
I tried http/https which both fail:
Hi!
As you will already have noted, the OpenSSL project is currently moving
its infrastructure to a new server. This migration is combined with a
change and/or upgrade of the tools (CVS - GIT, RT 3.x - 4.x, ...) so
we have decided to set up the new server first and to perform a step by
step
On 01/15/2013 12:50 PM, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Hi!
As you will already have noted, the OpenSSL project is currently moving
its infrastructure to a new server. This migration is combined with a
change and/or upgrade of the tools (CVS - GIT, RT 3.x - 4.x, ...) so
we have decided to set up
On 01/15/2013 12:50 PM, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Hi!
As you will already have noted, the OpenSSL project is currently moving
its infrastructure to a new server. This migration is combined with a
change and/or upgrade of the tools (CVS - GIT, RT 3.x - 4.x, ...) so
we have decided to set up
On 01/12/2013 01:26 PM, Attila Gulyas wrote:
Hi,
I have been working on implementing Maximm fragmentation length extension
(RFC3546, obsoleted by RFC6066) and I'd like to commit my work so that it'd
be available in later editions of openssl.
How may I do that? (I've been looking for an
This is a test of the upgraded RT for openssl.org
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated
Hi,
in the process of upgrading and migrating our server infrastructure I
have just put the updated Request Tracker into operation. The request
tracker stays reachable via r...@openssl.org (or the alias
openssl-b...@openssl.org).
While the migration is still in progress, the web interface is
Hi!
I have just installed a new 3 year wildcard *.openssl.org certificate
to our web site.
Thanks to GlobalSign for the new donation.
The migration should work more or less unnoted for the users. If you
experience any problems please drop me a message.
Best regards,
Lutz
On 04/11/2011 11:10 PM, Tim Jackson wrote:
Hi, I sent several patches to openssl-b...@openssl.org a few hours ago, but I
haven't seen them get forwarded to this list and don't see them at
http://rt.openssl.org/NoAuth/Buglist.html. Is this expected? Does
openssl-bugs still work, or do all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
unfortunately the OpenSSL project has been hit by a hardware defect
(hard disk and power supply). The project hence had to be migrated to
a different server using a later version of the operating system and
tools.
Services are currently being
Harold S. Henry wrote:
Thanks, Kyle. The problem, as identified in the delivery failure message, is
that openssl.org's mail server has a fixed message-size limit that is
exceeded by the size of the attachment. Sorry to be unclear.
Your contribution has been filed under #2342... but the
Kenneth Robinette wrote:
Lutz
How does one get access to the contributed .chm file? I looked on the
OpenSSL site and cannot see any reference to it?
On the bottom of the descriptive test, right hand side, there should be
a small reference to OpenSSL.zip.
Best regards,
Lutz
Am 28.05.2010 23:08, schrieb David Woodhouse:
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 10:14 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
The state of the test-repository is a bit old (approx one year) but
you
may have a look into
git://login.openssl.org/openssl
http://www.openssl.org/gitweb.cgi/
When the initial
Am 27.05.2010 18:48, schrieb David Woodhouse:
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 17:51 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 21:32 +0200, Ger Hobbelt wrote:
Those [i_a] bits are my markers in our local code base so I know which
edits
are mine when
David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 21:32 +0200, Ger Hobbelt wrote:
Those [i_a] bits are my markers in our local code base so I know which edits
are mine when doing a (manual) merge with 'vanilla' CVS HEAD. Yes, I know
there are smarter systems around, but I've been 'tracking'
From: Michael Wodei wo...@us.ibm.com
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:33:24 -0700
You can withdraw this one, I found the issue
Mike Wodei
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
In the past few days we had some problems with the hardware of the
OpenSSL server providing the public services (web, mail, etc).
We are now closely monitoring the system and preparing to migrate to
another server if necessary.
Thank you very
Boyle Owen wrote:
PPS: Although I have subscribed to this list, I am not getting the mails
(I have to keep checking the archives). Is there anyone who can check
out my account?
Hmm. If memory serves me right there was a subscribe message sent to
the list instead of the mailing list
David McCullough wrote:
Jivin Kyle Hamilton lays it down ...
Please mail these each as attachments to r...@openssl.org. This will
ensure that each gets entered into a trackable state, and also ensures
that the formatting for the patch files stays consistent.
No problems, I wasn't
Closing as resolved.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
Kyle Hamilton wrote:
I hope the test reports I sent to -bugs are useful. I'm on a Mac OSX
10.5.6 machine, Intel-based, and I ran tests in both 32 and 64 bit
modes, both without and with the optional features. I do not have gmp
installed, nor zlib, so I cannot vouch for their usability; I did
Kyle Hamilton wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Lutz Jaenicke l...@lutz-jaenicke.de wrote:
Hi Kyle,
thank you very much for reports, they are currently sitting in the
moderation queue. I would kindly ask you and other testers to either
* send success messages to the list with just
Jurko Gospodnetić wrote:
Hi all.
Just wandering whether there is something I am missing about posting
bug reports/patches to 'r...@openssl.org'. I send a report there three
days ago and got neither any confirmation nor did the report get
forwarded to the development list. I resent the
Thanks, patch applied.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
Patch applied.
Thanks,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Oct 21 14:23:50 2008]:
Hello rt,
During stress testing my project, suddenly got crash inside openssl
openssl version - openssl-0.9.8i
compiler - Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 Professional Edition (C++
project)
project - x64 debug compilation
OS -
David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 09:01 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
Note: I have reverted the DTLS1_BAD_VER part as DTLS1_BAD_VER handling
is not present in HEAD (0.9.9).
That makes sense.
I assume that DTLS1_BAD_VER handling wasn't added to HEAD because the
pre
From answer only sent to mailing list:
Yeah, it looks right. I haven't yet got it working with my test case,
because I need to use DTLS1_BAD_VER and there are other parts missing
from HEAD for that, on top of my patch in #1751 -- but I agree with your
assessment that it shouldn't be needed any
[jaenicke - Fri Oct 10 12:42:51 2008]:
I have applied the patch to 0.9.8-stable and adopted it to 0.9.9-dev. I
am not very familiar with the DTLS implementation so hopefully I did not
break it.
Note: I have reverted the DTLS1_BAD_VER part as DTLS1_BAD_VER handling
is not
present in HEAD
I have applied the patch to 0.9.8-stable and adopted it to 0.9.9-dev. I
am not very familiar with the DTLS implementation so hopefully I did not
break it.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Oct 07 10:57:04 2008]:
This patch to the 0.9.8 branch fixes two bugs with misordered incoming
packets in DTLS, which are reported as RT #1752.
Could you comment on the 0.9.9-dev branch as well?
The patch to d1_pkt.c applies fine. The length object is gone from the
David Woodhouse via RT wrote:
(Was waiting for the RT to autoreply with a number before I followed up,
but it doesn't seem to have arrived after half an hour, so I'll send
anyway. Hopefully the References: header will associate this with the
previous mail anyway...)
Mailings to rt are
Thanks, I have applied the respective patch to the 0.9.7, 0.9.8 and 0.9.9
branches, see
http://cvs.openssl.org/rlog?f=openssl/crypto/sha/Makefile
for commits 17496 to 17498.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
Hi!
I have just installed a new (2048bit) certificate and key to the
OpenSSL Project webserver. It is a wildcard certifcate for *.openssl.org
catching both www.openssl.org and rt.openssl.org.
Many thanks go to Steve Roylance from Globalsign for donating a
3 year wildcard SSL certificate!!
Best
It seems you do not have enough licenses for your C compiler which is
thus locking up.
Sincere regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
The OpenSSL project does not have a root CA program and has decided to
not supply root CA certificates with the toolkit.
Please checkout the FAQ:
How can I set up a bundle of commercial root CA certificates?
http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#USER16
Best regards,
Lutz
Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
I think I've discovered another problem with the current non-blocking API.
I have an application which reads data into fixed-size buffers which it
maintains per session. It uses non-blocking IO and select() when a read
returns SSL_ERROR_WANT_{READ,WRITE}.
To
Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 03:49:01PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
The record size of the SSL record is predetermined by the sender with
16k being the maximum size specified by the protocol.
32K for SSLv2, no?
I stopped caring
The OpenSSL distribution as of 0.9.8h is no longer shipped with any root
CA certificates.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
The OpenSSL distribution as of 0.9.8h is no longer shipped with any root
CA certificates.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Respective patch applied, thanks.
The fix will be in 0.9.8h.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Issue resolved by code modification, see ticket #1513.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Bodo Moeller wrote:
However, another intentional use of potentially unitialized data is
still left as of
http://cvs.openssl.org/getfile/openssl/crypto/rand/randfile.c?v=1.47.2.2
:
i=fread(buf,1,n,in);
if (i = 0) break;
/* even if n != i, use the
Zhichao Hong wrote:
I have sent email about a client hangs when trying to communicating
with server using 0.9.7e version of the openssl. When looking into the
debugger stack trace, the ssl3_read_n blocks forever in the s3_pkt.c.
When I browsed the cvs change history, the following issue was
The missing defitions have been added.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
Zhichao Hong wrote:
Thank you, Lutz, for the change set information! I have to admit that
I am not a power user of the openssl at the source level. We are not
controlling the server as it is a standard IIS HTTPS. The software
is using openssl library on top of openbsd stack. So do you
I have applied both the patch from Roumen Petrov and the Fixup from Alon
Bar-Lev.
I don't have a mingw environment to actually verify the correct
operation. Please check out the next snapshot and verify that everything
is working now as expected.
Best regards,
Lutz
Closing as well according to #1552
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
I have applied a different modification which is a little bit more in
line with the handling in other applications (where the handling seems
to be correct).
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17067
Best regards,
Lutz
__
Thanks, fixed in
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17069 (0.9.8-stable)
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17068 (HEAD)
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
I agree with Shaw Graham George's post on openssl-dev. Modifying system
settings upon installation would seem to be too intrusive for the
OpenSSL source package.
OpenSSL as distributed by the OpenSSL team does not modify system
settings during installation on any platform. Typically integrators
David Erosa García wrote:
Hello all.
I tried the openssl-users list but I think this may be a question for
the devel list:
I'm doing my homework about openssl, but *this question has nothing to
do with it*. It's just a doubt that arised while doing it.
There is one exercise with the
Andrew Lamoureux via RT wrote:
Hi, I'd like to report a bug in openssl-0.9.8g compiled with
Visual Studio. OS is Windows XP.
Access violation occurs when BN_rshift() is used on a BIGNUM whose
bit length is less (amount required varies) than the number of
bits requesting to be shifted.
OpenSSL does create keys in more components than just gen(r|d)sa. In
none of these functions any file permission mask is used.
All of the components in openssl/apps are using the file-BIO which
behaves like stdio and does not have idea about file permissions.
People using OpenSSL to generate their
That is indeed true. I have migrated RT quite a lot of time ago but did
miss the obvious references in the process.
* fixed the URI in the respective files for future releases
* added a redirection at the URI provided to the new page
Best regards,
Lutz
Closing according to respective email on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
a couple of days ago I've reported the bug:
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1641
It looks like that Bodo's commit (see below) has fixed the reported problem.
So the bug can be closed and set to fixed.
Best regards,
Richard Hartmann wrote:
Hi all,
3 X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_CRL unable to get certificate CRL
should read
3 X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_CRL: unable to get certificate CRL
i.e. there is a colon missing. If there is any interest, I can create a patch
but it is probably faster for both sides if
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Lutz,
Replies to active tickets are handled automatically.
I've a ticket open where I posted a couple of times updates:
http://rt.openssl.org/index.html?q=1611
but nothing of these appear here on the list - although they are properly
listed with #1611...
can
Bruno Bonfils wrote:
Hi openssl's people,
I'm currently writing a script to check a PKI. For this purpose, I
wrote a small patch to display the crlNumber directly from the crl's
app:
# openssl crl -in ca.crl -crlnumber -noout
crlNumber=42
I'll happy if the patch can be include in
Robert Gries wrote:
Well even though I get the error about the shared libraries, it did work with
is Configure:
./Configure --prefix=~gries/usr/local/ssl --openssldir=~gries/usr/local/ssl
threads linux-ppc64 -m64 -L/usr/local/lib -DOPENSSL_USE_GMP -lgmp -static
[EMAIL
Martin Peylo wrote:
Hi,
could the following OIDs please be added to the objects.txt file? They
are used by CMP (RFC 4210) and CRMF (RFC 4211) which I am implementing
right now. This would make it easier for me to supply a patch which
applies cleanly in case the objects.txt file was changed
This should be fixed by commit
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=16682
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
The SHA1 was recreated and the tarball was resigned by myself.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
[jaenicke - Fri Oct 19 11:39:05 2007]:
This will never be fixed in the 0.9.8f tarball (as it was rolled as is).
OpenSSL 0.9.8g has now been released using a correct version code.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL
Fixed in 0.9.8g
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenSSL version 0.9.8g released
===
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of
version 0.9.8g of our open source toolkit for SSL/TLS. This new
OpenSSL
Your statement is actually correct. Nevertheless it does not seem to be
useful to create
a new release (0.9.8g) just to correct an informational version number
code. It also
would not be a good idea to create a new tarball with the same name but
just a new
version number code.
We have therefore
I have made the following modifications to the download area (not
tracked by CVS, so the
action is not logged via openssl-cvs) at Wed Oct 17, 2007, 09:30 CEST
(07:30GMT):
* updated openssl-0.9.8f.tar.gz.sha1
* created new openssl-0.9.8f.tar.gz.asc with my (Lutz Jaenicke) personal
key matching
Grr. The OpenSSL web site is some (semi-)automatic thing that is updated
in a magic way. Probably only Ralf Engelschall fully understands how
this works :-)
I have made sure the correct files are linked now.
Best regards,
Lutz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 17 18:11:27 2007]:
Starting with OpenSSL 0.9.8f, ssl3_get_client_hello() no longer tests
whether the client proposed a
previous session_id before trying to process it. In previous releases,
a new session was always
created if no previous session was proposed
Applied, thanks.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
A respective compile time macro PEDANTIC (to be added to the C flags
as -DPEDANTIC)
has been added for OpenSSL 0.9.8f. The behavior has been clarified in
the manual page
and the FAQ
__
OpenSSL Project
Nitin M wrote:
Hi!
Can anyone please tell me the correct way to submit a patch here, as I
have never done that before on this list?
As stated somewhere on the website: submit it by email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note: wrt SPAM protection this interface is moderated so there may be some
delay(*)
Ben Laurie schrieb:
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Peter Waltenberg wrote:
Yes, it's desirable that that data is unknown however there is a
compromise possible:
Complement the area. It'll mean valgrind will only complain at the correct
place, or possibly
Peter Waltenberg wrote:
Yes, it's desirable that that data is unknown however there is a
compromise possible:
Complement the area. It'll mean valgrind will only complain at the correct
place, or possibly not at all, and it's still random. The performance hit
from doing that will be so small
Guessing on the stack being non-predictable does not seem to improve
entropy too much to me. I have therefore modified the code to no longer
use uninitialized memory in any case.
Not relying on -DPURIFY will also make valgrind users happy :-)
Best regards,
Lutz
Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
[...]
* in SMTP doing a STARTTLS without previous EHLO
will return a
503 STARTTLS command used when not advertised
* in IMAP doing a STARTLS requires a
. CAPABILITY
first.
In both cases the server
Patch applied.
Thanks,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
Applied to openssl-0.9.8 and openssl-dev trees.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
Applied to openssl-0.9.8 and openssl-dev.
Thanks,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
[...]
* in SMTP doing a STARTTLS without previous EHLO
will return a
503 STARTTLS command used when not advertised
* in IMAP doing a STARTLS requires a
. CAPABILITY
first.
In both cases the server
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
[...]
* in SMTP doing a STARTTLS without previous EHLO
will return a
503 STARTTLS command used when
Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
Hello Richard,
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 15 Feb 2007
10:34:23 -0800,
Kees Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
kees 3 years ago, I wrote a patch[1] (and did the TSU[2]) for adding
kees these features to s_client. Can
RT access configuration has been changed.
Best regards,
Lutz
---BeginMessage---
This transaction appears to have no content
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Hi!
The OpenSSL request tracker will go down now for migration to a new
version of RT and another host. All incoming email requests will be
queued and will be uploaded once the new setup is finished.
I will send another announcement once
Testing the new installation of RT for OpenSSL before declaring it live.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated
Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
Testing the new installation of RT for OpenSSL before declaring it live.
Testing the mail gateway before declaring it live.
__
OpenSSL Project http
Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
Testing the new installation of RT for OpenSSL before declaring it live.
Testing the mail gateway before declaring it live.
__
OpenSSL Project http
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Hi!
The OpenSSL request tracker will go down now for migration to a new
version of RT and another host. All incoming email requests will be
queued and will be uploaded once the new setup is finished.
I will send
Lutz Jaenicke via RT schrieb:
Testing the new installation of RT for OpenSSL before declaring it live.
Testing with modified settings. Duplicate emails to openssl-dev should
now be gone.
Hopefully...
Best regards,
Lutz
-
Heres a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers
- End forwarded message -
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine
Hi!
The OpenSSL request tracker will go down now for migration to a new
version of RT and another host. All incoming email requests will be
queued and will be uploaded once the new setup is finished.
I will send another announcement once the request tracker is back up online.
Best regards,
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Hi!
The OpenSSL request tracker will go down now for migration to a new
version of RT and another host. All incoming email requests will be
queued and will be uploaded once the new setup is finished.
I will send another announcement once the request tracker is back up
The attached patch fixes an incorrect handling of special characters.
Patch is against 0.9.8d.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Atul Kulkarni (SIGSEC) via RT wrote:
That seems to be a bug with openssl dev package, as I am trying to build
on a native ppc64 machine why should it add a -b directive asking for a
cross-compilation machine. Please note my code compiles without it
though!
If there is any specific reason
1 - 100 of 705 matches
Mail list logo
