On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 08:04:28PM +0200, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
I've had 2 users report a crash in RC4() on x86_64. The
backtrace looks like:
#0 RC4 () at rc4-x86_64.s:343
#1 0x012d in ?? ()
#2 0x00df in ?? ()
#3 0x020b5660 in ?? ()
#4
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:08:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 08:04:28PM +0200, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
I've had 2 users report a crash in RC4() on x86_64. The
backtrace looks like:
#0 RC4 () at rc4-x86_64.s:343
#1 0x012d in ?? ()
#2
This looks simular to the AES problem with had, with a length of 0?
For reference. What was going on was the RC4_set_key was generating
compact key schedule on Intel legacy CPU, while rc4_md5_enc was treating
as non-compact with 32-bit elements. As results it was messed up in such
way that
: Thursday, April 19, 2012 1:52:31 PM
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2792] Crash in rc4 on x86_64
This looks simular to the AES problem with had, with a length
of 0?
For reference. What was going on was the RC4_set_key was generating
compact key schedule on Intel legacy CPU, while rc4_md5_enc
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 1:52:31 PM
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2792] Crash in rc4 on x86_64
This looks simular to the AES problem with had, with a
length
of 0?
For reference. What was going on was the RC4_set_key was generating
compact
I've had 2 users report a crash in RC4() on x86_64. The
backtrace looks like:
#0 RC4 () at rc4-x86_64.s:343
#1 0x012d in ?? ()
#2 0x00df in ?? ()
#3 0x020b5660 in ?? ()
#4 0x7fc075f6a9c9 in rc4_hmac_md5_cipher (ctx=optimized out,
out=0x20aae98
Hi,
I've had 2 users report a crash in RC4() on x86_64. The
backtrace looks like:
#0 RC4 () at rc4-x86_64.s:343
#1 0x012d in ?? ()
#2 0x00df in ?? ()
#3 0x020b5660 in ?? ()
#4 0x7fc075f6a9c9 in rc4_hmac_md5_cipher (ctx=optimized out,
out=0x20aae98
