Old, unsupported release. Old, unsupported operating system. :)
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List
Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Feb 1 00:59:01 2003]:
$ ./openssl req -x509 -new -nodes -out sscert.pem -rand /tmp/somefile
Generating a 1024 bit RSA private key
++
..++
writing new private key to 'privkey.pem'
-
You
how's this?
* 0 getrn(lh = 0x000404092290, data = 0x00040409d930, rhash = 0x00801a40), line 430 in lhash.c
1 lh_insert(lh = 0x000404092290, data = 0x00040409d930), line 189 in lhash.c
2 OBJ_add_object(obj = 0x000404088a00), line 253 in obj_dat.c
3
i forgot to add-
dbx's message says:
SIGSEGV (absentee space fault) in getrn at line 430 in file lhash.c
couldn't read lhash.c
Wendy Palm wrote:
how's this?
* 0 getrn(lh = 0x000404092290, data = 0x00040409d930, rhash =
0x00801a40), line 430 in lhash.c
1 lh_insert(lh =
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Feb 1 00:59:01 2003]:
$ ./openssl req -x509 -new -nodes -out sscert.pem -rand /tmp/somefile
Generating a 1024 bit RSA private key
++
..++
writing new private key to 'privkey.pem'
-
You are about to be asked to
Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Feb 1 00:59:01 2003]:
$ ./openssl req -x509 -new -nodes -out sscert.pem -rand /tmp/somefile
Generating a 1024 bit RSA private key
++
..++
writing new private key to 'privkey.pem'
-
how's this?
* 0 getrn(lh = 0x000404092290, data = 0x00040409d930, rhash =
0x00801a40), line 430 in lhash.c
1 lh_insert(lh = 0x000404092290, data = 0x00040409d930), line 189 in
lhash.c
2 OBJ_add_object(obj = 0x000404088a00), line 253 in obj_dat.c
3
i forgot to add-
dbx's message says:
SIGSEGV (absentee space fault) in getrn at line 430 in file lhash.c
couldn't read lhash.c
Wendy Palm wrote:
how's this?
* 0 getrn(lh = 0x000404092290, data = 0x00040409d930, rhash =
0x00801a40), line 430 in lhash.c
1 lh_insert(lh
i'm sorry for the delay in response. i've been out of the office during the
last couple of weeks.
yes, more tests fail than i reported, but we only wanted enough openssl
to work with openssh, so once i got what i wanted, i didn't go any further
until i had more time to devote to it.
attached
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 31 21:06:07 2003]:
i'm sorry for the delay in response. i've been out of the office
during the
last couple of weeks.
yes, more tests fail than i reported, but we only wanted enough
openssl
to work with openssh, so once i got what i wanted, i didn't go
i'm happy to test anything you want, but crays are more my forte
and NEC just my spare time, so i can't provide much programming
help myself.
Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 31 21:06:07 2003]:
i'm sorry for the delay in response. i've been out of the office
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 31 21:36:01 2003]:
i'm happy to test anything you want, but crays are more my forte
and NEC just my spare time, so i can't provide much programming
help myself.
I don't have acess to anything like that myself so...
From that report it looks like the stuff that
$ cd apps
$ ./openssl req -x509 -new -nodes -out sscert.pem
unable to load 'random state'
This means that the random number generator has not been seeded
with much random data.
Generating a 1024 bit RSA private key
8953:error:24064064:random number generator:SSLEAY_RAND_BYTES:PRNG not
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Feb 1 00:02:48 2003]:
$ cd apps
$ ./openssl req -x509 -new -nodes -out sscert.pem
unable to load 'random state'
This means that the random number generator has not been seeded
with much random data.
Generating a 1024 bit RSA private key
$ ./openssl req -x509 -new -nodes -out sscert.pem -rand /tmp/somefile
Generating a 1024 bit RSA private key
++
..++
writing new private key to 'privkey.pem'
-
You are about to be asked to enter information that will be incorporated
into your
Will anything happen with this?
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Jan 18 11:02:31 2003]:
I already answered this once, but it didn't come through for some
reason...
+ sx6, cc:-g -DTERMIOS::(unknown):::SIXTY_FOUR_BIT DES_INT:::,
No optimization? Not even lousy -O?
-g overrides any
Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
+ sx6, cc:-g -DTERMIOS::(unknown):::SIXTY_FOUR_BIT DES_INT:::,
No optimization? Not even lousy -O?
-g overrides any optimization you give, and i think there's a problem with
the optimizer anyway because with default optimization, aes-128-cbc test fails.
it's
I already answered this once, but it didn't come through for some
reason...
+ sx6, cc:-g -DTERMIOS::(unknown):::SIXTY_FOUR_BIT DES_INT:::,
No optimization? Not even lousy -O?
-g overrides any optimization you give,
Yes, that's what normally happens...
and i think there's a problem
Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
+ sx6, cc:-g -DTERMIOS::(unknown):::SIXTY_FOUR_BIT DES_INT:::,
No optimization? Not even lousy -O?
-g overrides any optimization you give, and i think there's a problem with
the optimizer anyway because with default optimization, aes-128-cbc test fails.
it's
+ sx6, cc:-g -DTERMIOS::(unknown):::SIXTY_FOUR_BIT DES_INT:::,
No optimization? Not even lousy -O?
SIXTY_FOUR_BIT? SIXTY_FOUR_BIT aims ILP32 ABIs implemented on 64-bit
CPUs, N32 ABI on IRIX 6 is one example. If your sizeof(long)==8, then
you should use SIXTY_FOUR_BIT_LONG. Please confirm.
A.
Cray Inc provides support for some NEC sites, so that's why this is coming from me.
configuration patches to make openssl compile on NEC's SX-6 machines.
diff -c openssl-0.9.7.orig/config.orig openssl-0.9.7.sx6/config
*** openssl-0.9.7.orig/config.orig Fri Jan 10 17:54:08 2003
---
21 matches
Mail list logo
