On 10/17/2010 4:36 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010, aerow...@gmail.com wrote:
Ugh. This is worse than I thought. It's *intermittently* failing like
that. After a few more minutes, I tried it again, and got the expected
output.
Is there some way to specify a base
Thanks Jeffrey. I was aware of the limitation and how image randomization
works in Vista and higher so disabling ASLR was the first thing I tried.
Unfortunately, disabling ASLR didn't fix the problem. The DLL gets relocated
with or without ASLR enabled. The VC9-generated DLL does not have
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010, Grant Averett wrote:
Even specifying a different base address doesn't fix the problem. I have a
different default address that the DLL consistently gets relocated to but
changing the preferred base address of libeay32 to that address still doesn't
work. The DLL
Question #1. Are we talking about 32-bit version or is it the problem
with *both* x86 and x64 code?
Even specifying a different base address doesn't fix the problem. I
have a different default address that the DLL consistently gets
relocated to but changing the preferred base address of
On Windows it is not possible to require that a DLL be loaded at a
specific address in memory within a process. The base address is simply
a recommendation and if correct will result in the library loading
process being faster than if it is not.
Correct and prerequisite for recommended base
Vincent,
As I don't have access to little-endian MIPS,
In other words my understanding is that *your* MIPS platform is
little-endian, isn't it? I noticed something that has to be a bug in
sha512-mips.pl, which would fail sha256 test on little-endian MIPS32
platform. Specifically $MSB assignment
Is libeay32.dll linked with /FIXED? Verify with 'dumpbin /headers
libeay32.dll', look for DLL characteristicsNo! The DLL still had the
randomization code turned on after I dumped it. It turns out I had the
/FIXED flag in the wrong place for the actual DLL. Once I looked closer at
the
I tested this on the x86 version of the DLL and I imagine it will fix
the x64 DLL as well (they both reported the same error). It looks
like this setting will need to be added for VS2010.
As mentioned [in another reply], I was under impression that x64 code is
always position-independent,
Hello,
I need a sample program in C to test DTLS code on my router (server). Or
else let me know how can i send DTLS alerts from a windows client to the
server.
This is very urgent need, Your help is very much appreciated and thanks in
advance.
Thanks,
Ranjith
