In message <1480697558.2410.33.ca...@hansenpartnership.com> on Fri, 02 Dec 2016
08:52:38 -0800, James Bottomley said:
James.Bottomley> On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 09:30 +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
James.Bottomley> >
James.Bottomley> > James Bottomley
In message <1481042048.4406.14.ca...@hansenpartnership.com> on Tue, 06 Dec 2016
08:34:08 -0800, James Bottomley said:
James.Bottomley> On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 15:12 +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
James.Bottomley> > In message
On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 17:47 +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
> In message <1481042048.4406.14.ca...@hansenpartnership.com> on Tue,
> 06 Dec 2016 08:34:08 -0800, James Bottomley <
> james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> said:
>
> James.Bottomley> On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 15:12 +0100, Richard Levitte
>
ActiveState Perl64: "This is perl 5, version 24, subversion 0 (v5.24.0)
built for MSWin32-x64-multi-thread"
I sorted it out. The key is to build from either
"VS2015 x86 Native Tools Command Prompt" || "VS2015 x64 Native Tools
Command Prompt"
It doesn't like being built from:
"MSBuild Command
On 12/06/2016 11:01 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> The next problem is that this is slightly harder simply to insert into
> the PEM code. The BIO parsing is done in PEM_bytes_read_bio() not
> PEM_read_bio_PrivateKey(). The easy way to cope with this would be to
> move PEM parsing into the
In message <20161206.223057.237264374331072901.levi...@openssl.org> on Tue, 06
Dec 2016 22:30:57 +0100 (CET), Richard Levitte said:
levitte> That being said, it should certainly be easy enough to change the
levitte> appropriate places to make sure headers are available as
On 12/05/2016 09:22 PM, Joel Winarske wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm having trouble building 1.1.0c for WIN32. Perl ends up in a hard
> loop. I see same symtom building 1.0.2j, but different error. Any
> suggestions to get past this?
>
What version of perl?
-Ben
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To
On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 15:12 +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
> In message <1480697558.2410.33.ca...@hansenpartnership.com> on Fri,
> 02 Dec 2016 08:52:38 -0800, James Bottomley <
> james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> said:
>
> James.Bottomley> On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 09:30 +0100, Richard Levitte
>
In message <58472e4f.3010...@roumenpetrov.info> on Tue, 06 Dec 2016 23:31:59
+0200, Roumen Petrov said:
openssl> Hi Richard,
openssl>
openssl> Richard Levitte wrote:
openssl> > [SNIP]
openssl> > James.Bottomley> 1. We agreed that usability is greatly enhanced if
In message <1481043672.4406.22.ca...@hansenpartnership.com> on Tue, 06 Dec 2016
09:01:12 -0800, James Bottomley said:
James.Bottomley> On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 17:47 +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
James.Bottomley> > In message
Hi Richard,
Richard Levitte wrote:
[SNIP]
James.Bottomley>1. We agreed that usability is greatly enhanced if openssl
simply loads
James.Bottomley> a key when presented with the file/uri etc. without the
user having
James.Bottomley> to specify what the format of a key is
11 matches
Mail list logo