In message <20170422062614.ga23...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> on Sat, 22 Apr 2017
00:26:14 -0600, The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> said:
doctor> openssl-1.0.2-stable-SNAP-20170422.tar.gz
doctor>
doctor> and
doctor>
doctor> openssl-1.1.0-stable-SNAP-20170422.
openssl-1.0.2-stable-SNAP-20170422.tar.gz
and
openssl-1.1.0-stable-SNAP-20170422.tar.gz
did not generate accordingly.
They are at 0 bytes
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Be
In message
<1914c34d74694a768307358d80d4a...@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> on Sat,
22 Apr 2017 12:31:42 +, "Salz, Rich" said:
rsalz> > And What happened to openssl 1.0.1 ?
rsalz>
rsalz> We stopped supporting it back in December.
We were still building snapshots
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 09:10:56AM +0200, Richard Levitte wrote:
> In message <20170422062614.ga23...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> on Sat, 22 Apr 2017
> 00:26:14 -0600, The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> said:
>
> doctor> openssl-1.0.2-stable-SNAP-20170422.tar.gz
> d
We are still reviewing several PR's from the previous code health, which was
about converting tests to use the new test framework. With this extended time
period, we'll have ended up converting almost all the tests, which is great.
We'll announce the next project toward the end of the week.
> And What happened to openssl 1.0.1 ?
We stopped supporting it back in December.
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 09:30:31AM +, Matt Caswell wrote:
> I am pleased to be able to announce the publication of our new Project
> Bylaws. I have written a short blog post about what we are hoping to
> achieve and some of the thinking that went into these here:
>
>