David you are bringing completely unrelated issues into the situation.
David Schwartz wrote:
...SNIP...
One other point, I didn't mention threads to argue that if another
thread
steals your data, the operation will clearly block. I mentioned it to show
that it's impossible for
David Schwartz wrote:
No. That you cannot think of a way does not mean that no way exists.
WTF ! Is dark the absence of light, or is light the absence of dark ?
Please prove your way exists, there are enough poll/select
implementations available to inspect. Your words have no
Hello,
I am trying to work a full SSL shutdown (close notify sent and received
before closing the socket).
The situation:
* Am currently in established / active SSL state, with a working
connection.
* No shutdown notify has been received and we are being to instigate
the shutdown notify.
David,
Please post a link to a manpage or other documentation that justifies your
description of select.
Your stat analogy is incomplete; stat returns the true file size, in the
absence of other external factors, such as another process (or thread)
doing something. Select makes the same
jimmy wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to write an http server which supports virtual servers
ssl sessions. If I were to support the TLS 1.0 server name extension
(which says different virtual servers cud send different
certificates), then would I be able to use the same SSL_CTX across the
different
Hello,
I have the following code nothing fancy just opening a pkcs12 file and
then trying to free every thing. when I run the code though purify I
get an error on sk_X509_pop_free, Freeing unallocated memeory, Freeing
memory read. If I don't uses sk_X509_free I get a memory leek but I
I'm running Solaris 5.9 and did the basic install
commands w/ openssl 0.9.8..
make
make install
when I run svn (subversion) I get the following error:
ld.so.1: svn: fatal: libssl.so.0.9.8: open failed: No
such file or directory
Killed
i'm stumped as to what I did wrong..did I miss a step
Did you update your LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include /usr/local/ssl/lib?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alex Bartonek
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 1:36 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: openssl 0.9.8 install issue?
I'm running Solaris
no..I dont have a env variable as LD_LIBRARY_PATH
setup currently.. also, /usr/lib/ssl/lib does not
exist. (/usr/lib/ssl does though).
-alex
--- Scott, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you update your LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include
/usr/local/ssl/lib?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Try adding:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/lib/ssl; export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
to see if that helps.
Also, does the library actually exist?
Questions:
Did the compile work?
Did the make install work?
Did you see where the file was installed?
-Original Message-
From:
no the export does not help...
Here is the output of 'make':
making all in crypto...
making all in crypto/objects...
making all in crypto/md2...
making all in crypto/md4...
making all in crypto/md5...
making all in crypto/sha...
making all in crypto/hmac...
making all in crypto/ripemd...
making
So your issue is not after the package is installed... it's during the
make/install phase. Did you run a configure prior to running make? What does
the README files state? Are the pre-req packages installed eg. gcc3.2 and
libiconv?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
installing libcrypto.a
installing libssl.a
cp libcrypto.pc /usr/local/ssl/lib/pkgconfig
chmod 644 /usr/local/ssl/lib/pkgconfig/libcrypto.pc
cp libssl.pc /usr/local/ssl/lib/pkgconfig
chmod 644 /usr/local/ssl/lib/pkgconfig/libssl.pc
cp openssl.pc /usr/local/ssl/lib/pkgconfig
chmod 644
yes.. I did a ldd svn ..seems as though I do not have
the library..
--- Marek Marcola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
installing libcrypto.a
installing libssl.a
cp libcrypto.pc /usr/local/ssl/lib/pkgconfig
chmod 644
/usr/local/ssl/lib/pkgconfig/libcrypto.pc
cp libssl.pc
yes I ran configure and yes the prerequisites are
met...
what does the readme say..alot of stuff from a
descripton of openssl, small overview about libssl.a,
libcrypto... then about a young Tim Hudson and Eric
Young how they fought off the cold weather and braved
the harsh conditions in the
Is your OS 8 or 9? Why not just get a package version from sunfreeware?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alex Bartonek
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 3:54 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: openssl 0.9.8 install issue?
yes I
Can anyone say when the openssl-fips-1.1.tar.gz
distribution announced on Saturday will be available for download?
Thanks!
Richard
I heard 'very soon now' :)
Tinnerello, Richard wrote:
Can anyone say when the openssl-fips-1.1.tar.gz distribution announced
on Saturday will be available for download? Thanks!
Richard
__
OpenSSL Project
David you are bringing completely unrelated issues into the situation.
No, you are failing to understand my argument.
David Schwartz wrote:
...SNIP...
One other point, I didn't mention threads to argue that if
another thread
steals your data, the operation will clearly
David Schwartz wrote:
No. That you cannot think of a way does not mean that no way exists.
WTF ! Is dark the absence of light, or is light the absence of dark ?
Please prove your way exists, there are enough poll/select
implementations available to inspect. Your words have no
David,
Please post a link to a manpage or other documentation that
justifies your
description of select.
I posted a link to the SuSv2 description of 'select'. There is no
guarantee
there that a future operation will not block.
--On Wednesday, June 21, 2006 3:36 PM -0700 David Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The same problem occurs with one thread. Consider the following code,
assume blocking sockets:
1) do some stuff
2) do a huge write, don't check for short writes since our socket is
blocking
That code
The same problem occurs with one thread. Consider the
following code,
assume blocking sockets:
1) do some stuff
2) do a huge write, don't check for short writes since our socket is
blocking
That code is broken. Fix it. You must _always_ check for short
writes. Not
doing so is
23 matches
Mail list logo